Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13104070)
Would it make a blind bit of difference? It might, as nonsensical as that seems. We can smell garlic, tobacco, alcohol from passersby, so it's not inconceivable that a contagious airborne particle could spread better without masks. However, I'm not necessarily advocating that. A balance has to be struck. We don't want to live our lives in Saran wrap.
My point was that in signalling an "all clear" (masks are up to you) the pendulum swings too far in the other direction. Hardly anyone wears masks, and the virus spreads (killing the old). Even for me, someone fairly risk averse on Covid, I rarely wear a mask. It's not that I want to, but I would be reluctantly willing to if others were. I bet I am not alone. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 13104090)
FWIW, most people I saw out and about yesterday were in masks. Some shops require masks.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104126)
No,not huge. The immediate possibility of spreading the virus was limited to that very small group of people sitting unmasked for two hours. That was a small group and a small risk compared to everyone not wearing a mask anywhere and everyone potentially spreading it.
Those earlier times being when there were no vaccines and only partial vaccination numbers until they grew to present levels. And now, the stats are showing very high numbers of deaths and hospitalisations again - with negative impacts on non covid patients. I don't know why people are playing this down. I must have posted several times here about the UK daily death figures in January 2022 that were higher than any single day since February 2021. :nod: So if there is a high number of deaths and hospitalizations is the NHS about to stop all non urgent surgeries? Have they reached a critical point whereby patient and staff safety is a major concern? To quote from the BBC article we had record numbers of over 4 million recorded yet the numbers in hospital and on ventilators is exceptionally small by comparison and i quote:A high number of infections means the UK can expect Covid hospitalisations to rise too, although vaccines are still helping to stop many severe cases, say experts. According to the latest figures, there were 17,440 patients in hospital with the virus on 24 March. About half will have been admitted for something else, rather than Covid, but tested positive. Just over 300 of them needed an intensive care bed with a ventilator to help them breathe. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 13104192)
Yet a quick visit to Natures Fare which is a health food store catering for anyone wanting to buy healthy foods, drinks and vitamins. Only very limited number of people wearing one yet you would have thought that this type of store would have some kind of policy in place and maybe recommendations on the door.
Just over 300 of them needed an intensive care bed with a ventilator to help them breathe. 300 patients on ventilators seems a scary number. Is there another condition that puts so many patients in intensive care? What are the numbers for RTAs and stabbings? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 13104135)
If you believe that mask wearing is good for you, and for others, why do you not wear one?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 13104192)
No it's not limited to those sitting unmasked. If we have 6 people, say 3 sets of couples that's three individual households that are potentially spreading to each other and then all go back to their individual homes
Ask yourself, what is the greater number of people - those dining out or those not dining out. It's the later. So the tiny minority of people dining out maskless would constitute a far lesser threat than if everyone else was going maskless willy-nilly. So if there is a high number of deaths and hospitalizations is the NHS about to stop all non urgent surgeries? Have they reached a critical point whereby patient and staff safety is a major concern? A record number of more than 400 employees in NHS England are quitting their jobs every week... One NHS intensive care consultant recently tweeted: “We started the pandemic with 17 ICU consultants. Over the last 24 months, two have retired, one has resigned, one is on long-term sabbatical, three have been off for long periods with stress – all needed psych support.” Clearly there isn’t a hope of reducing the 6.2 million-strong waiting list in England with staff attrition like that. The bottom line is that the NHS is not coping much better now than it was at Covid’s peaks. We are drowning – in Covid patients, cancer patients, the patients on the waiting list backlogs, and the patients whose conditions have become infinitely more complex and harmful because they’ve been waiting so long. To quote from the BBC article we had record numbers of over 4 million recorded yet the numbers in hospital and on ventilators is exceptionally small by comparison and i quote:A high number of infections means the UK can expect Covid hospitalisations to rise too, although vaccines are still helping to stop many severe cases, say experts. But while it's infecting people at a far higher rate than previously, the same rate of bad outcomes results in a higher number of deaths. Hence that fact about January including the highest daily death total since February 2021. How many times does that need to be repeated? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 13104195)
On the first paragraph, no, I would not expect a health food store to enforce healthy policies. Health food, naturopaths, people involved in alternative medicine tend more toward libertarian concepts and far right positions than they do to support public health. They are necessarily opposed to science as the potions and remedies they peddle are, in fact, nonsensical, and they need their customers to be ill informed.
300 patients on ventilators seems a scary number. Is there another condition that puts so many patients in intensive care? What are the numbers for RTAs and stabbings? I suspect that stabbings in UK are much higher in hospital admissions, although not necessarily ICU, particularly in London and other major cities. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104272)
Yes, but you have ignored where I said compared to everyone else.
Ask yourself, what is the greater number of people - those dining out or those not dining out. It's the later. So the tiny minority of people dining out maskless would constitute a far lesser threat than if everyone else was going maskless willy-nilly. It's more about getting them going again isn't it? There's a ton of statistics to show that patients haven't even been going to hospital as they previously did. Maybe there's been a cure for cancer and people haven't been getting it. :blink: Yes, if you believe people on the ground, in the know, instead of politicians with all their 'world beating' claptrap. Yes we all know that it's "mild" and that vaccines help. We also know that means bad outcomes are much less likely. But while it's infecting people at a far higher rate than previously, the same rate of bad outcomes results in a higher number of deaths. Hence that fact about January including the highest daily death total since February 2021. How many times does that need to be repeated? We know that the only way to seriously reduce the numbers is lockdowns and strict capacity limits. We also know that most people don't really want that and the government has pretty much said they wouldn't go there again so where does that leave us? Putting masks back on again in indoor spaces is not going to save the NHS or seriously reduce the 4 million plus people who have contracted it, it's just not. I would suggest the NHS has been on its knees and working at 90% plus capacity for years and staffing shortages were always going to happen as nurses and doctors became disillusioned with the hours and the pay, COVID just exasperated it. Of course the only way to work through the backlog is to increase manpower but with that option on shaky ground its more likely increased working hours and weekend working will be the way forward effectively putting even more pressure on the remaining staff. I don't know what the answer is but it doesn't seem like the UK government is bothered by it. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 13104421)
So what does this all mean? They lifted restrictions too early and people are dying and or not getting healthcare they need. Governments are ignoring health bosses and plunging the NHS into crisis and more people are suffering and not getting healthcare they need. NHS workers are jumping ship due to stress and burnout and not enough new ones to replace them and all the while there is a massive backlog to deal with.
We know that the only way to seriously reduce the numbers is lockdowns and strict capacity limits. We also know that most people don't really want that and the government has pretty much said they wouldn't go there again so where does that leave us? Putting masks back on again in indoor spaces is not going to save the NHS or seriously reduce the 4 million plus people who have contracted it, it's just not. I would suggest the NHS has been on its knees and working at 90% plus capacity for years and staffing shortages were always going to happen as nurses and doctors became disillusioned with the hours and the pay, COVID just exasperated it. Of course the only way to work through the backlog is to increase manpower but with that option on shaky ground its more likely increased working hours and weekend working will be the way forward effectively putting even more pressure on the remaining staff. I don't know what the answer is but it doesn't seem like the UK government is bothered by it. It doesn't seem anyone in the UK is bothered by it either.... not anyone I speak to anyway, my sister says you would never know covid ever existed there now, pubs are packed, lockdowns are a distant memory and you may see an occasional mask wearer.... people are getting covid obviously, but its more if a roll your eyes, oh John isn't at work today he has covid......then.... hey what a nice day it is today and a weather conversation ensues.... |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 13104479)
It doesn't seem anyone in the UK is bothered by it either.... not anyone I speak to anyway, my sister says you would never know covid ever existed there now, pubs are packed, lockdowns are a distant memory and you may see an occasional mask wearer.... people are getting covid obviously, but its more if a roll your eyes, oh John isn't at work today he has covid......then.... hey what a nice day it is today and a weather conversation ensues....
It's perhaps another indication how selfish, uncaring and blinkered many in the nation have become. Just an extension of Brexit and cheering on the liars and thieves in the present government. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104485)
I don't dispute this as I can well believe it.
It's perhaps another indication how selfish, uncaring and blinkered many in the nation have become. Just an extension of Brexit and cheering on the liars and thieves in the present government. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13104520)
I wouldn't necessarily link it to Brexit or general uncaring. It's more an out of sight out of mind thing. There are still a thousand Covid deaths a week, but the media doesn't seem dwell on it, so the public assumes it's all done and dusted.
Yes agreed, as I have said before, the media drives the majority of the public, it can inflame the public and work them into a frenzy, it can also de escalate them very easily.... . |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13104520)
There are still a thousand Covid deaths a week, but the media doesn't seem dwell on it, so the public assumes it's all done and dusted.
They don't need to go googling or doomscrolling or watching or listening to everything on the telly or radio, these bits of information are just there, right in front of them. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 13104479)
It doesn't seem anyone in the UK is bothered by it either.... not anyone I speak to anyway, my sister says you would never know covid ever existed there now, pubs are packed, lockdowns are a distant memory and you may see an occasional mask wearer.... people are getting covid obviously, but its more if a roll your eyes, oh John isn't at work today he has covid......then.... hey what a nice day it is today and a weather conversation ensues....
Incidentally, Spain is now treating this 'disease' as an endemic, wont be long for other countries to follow suit. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104562)
I don't think the media needs to dwell on it, people just need to pay attention and not be so dismissive. I'm just going to browse recent headlines and see what there is.
They don't need to go googling or doomscrolling or watching or listening to everything on the telly or radio, these bits of information are just there, right in front of them. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104562)
I don't think the media needs to dwell on it, people just need to pay attention and not be so dismissive. I'm just going to browse recent headlines and see what there is.
They don't need to go googling or doomscrolling or watching or listening to everything on the telly or radio, these bits of information are just there, right in front of them. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13104605)
Yes, the information is there for anyone who cares to look.
The examples given were BBC, ITV, Daily Express, and Daily Mail. Those are resources that people routinely see and read (and then discuss) without having to search. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104485)
I don't dispute this as I can well believe it.
It's perhaps another indication how selfish, uncaring and blinkered many in the nation have become. Just an extension of Brexit and cheering on the liars and thieves in the present government. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104485)
I don't dispute this as I can well believe it.
It's perhaps another indication how selfish, uncaring and blinkered many in the nation have become. Just an extension of Brexit and cheering on the liars and thieves in the present government. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104651)
The point I'm trying to make is that it does not need looking for.
The examples given were BBC, ITV, Daily Express, and Daily Mail. Those are resources that people routinely see and read (and then discuss) without having to search. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13104763)
In my view, the media should be developing a standardized "Covid risk" reporting format, and continuing a tone of urgency until the deaths fall below a few dozen. Something like the UV index and an outlook by locality..
Like those here or this https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...87cd75053e.jpg :rofl: |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13104803)
Sounds like it could have some interesting graphics. :lol:
Like those here or this https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...87cd75053e.jpg :rofl: |
Re: Coronavirus
Peterborough Public Health have launched a COVID risk index chart along with mask wearing, social activity advice for each level.
https://www.peterboroughpublichealth...19-risk-index/ https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...6192e82266.png |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 13104848)
Peterborough Public Health have launched a COVID risk index chart along with mask wearing, social activity advice for each level.
https://www.peterboroughpublichealth...19-risk-index/ https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...6192e82266.png |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13104900)
Very good. Something like this (standardized) at a national level is the way to go. Some standardized guidance (risk mitigation) to go with each level too.
This is what the advice is for HIGH RISK, So no mall walking for me. The combo of the below seasonal cold weather and COVID rules is frustrating indeed. I'm rapidly going round the twist. Guidance for General Population
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 13104925)
i think it's excellent though how many will take note of this is another matter. I wonder if other health units are using it
This is what the advice is for HIGH RISK, So no mall walking for me. The combo of the below seasonal cold weather and COVID rules is frustrating indeed. I'm rapidly going round the twist. Guidance for General Population
|
Re: Coronavirus
Good OpEd from Dr Christina Pagel at UCL.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...icron-pandemic Three Covid myths: 1. Covid is endemic (it’s not because it can still spread out of control); 2. Covid is evolving to be milder (variants are evolving independently and a more serious variant can still emerge); 3. Vaccination program is complete (existing vaccines wane and are not necessarily effective against new variants yet to emerge). |
Re: Coronavirus
BERLIN — A 60-year-old man allegedly had himself vaccinated against COVID-19 dozens of times in Germany in order to sell forged vaccination cards with real vaccine batch numbers to people not wanting to get vaccinated themselves.
The man from the eastern Germany city of Magdeburg, whose name was not released in line with German privacy rules, is said to have received up to 90 shots against COVID-19 at vaccination centers in the eastern state of Saxony for months until criminal police caught him this month, the German news agency dpa reported Sunday. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ts/7266815001/ |
Re: Coronavirus
With that Shanghai wide lockdown, I do wonder if it's ongoing "zero Covid policy" or some new variant ?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 13106546)
With that Shanghai wide lockdown, I do wonder if it's ongoing "zero Covid policy" or some new variant ?
|
Re: Coronavirus
I received my FOURTH vaccine invitation this morning for BC.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8742523/c...bility-canada/ |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 13106682)
I received my FOURTH vaccine invitation this morning for BC.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8742523/c...bility-canada/ Here’s who is eligible for a 4th COVID-19 vaccine across Canada...Provinces and territories are expanding eligibility for fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine to millions more Canadians. This week, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended that second boosters be administered to residents aged 70 and over. Here’s where things stand so far: NEW BRUNSWICK, NOVA SCOTIA AND P.E.I.: All are working on updating guidance, with announcements expected in the coming days. When that announcement was made, there was the suggestion that it would be extended for others from April 19. And just confirmed literally minutes ago on CBC 2nd COVID-19 boosters to be offered to New Brunswickers 50+ |
Re: Coronavirus
I don’t know about other provinces, but here in BC this is how my jabs were spaced apart according to the gov guidance at the time.
#1 May 2021 #2 July 2021 #3 October 2021 #4 Will book for April 2022 |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13106700)
That link is a little misleading. Or at least parts of it are.
I don't know about NS and PEI and it may very well be the case that guidance is being updated but 4th doses/2nd boosters have been recommended and available in NB since early February, pretty much in line with the other provinces. When that announcement was made, there was the suggestion that it would be extended for others from April 19. And just confirmed literally minutes ago on CBC |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 13106739)
...Peterborough and area remain high risk for infection, apparently a third of schoolkids are off sick right now.
It's a good job there isn't a pandemic isn't it. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13106813)
NB has record hospital numbers of covid patients and critical staffing levels with loads of non urgent surgery and appointments being delayed.
It's a good job there isn't a pandemic isn't it. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 13106827)
NB is still recording numbers? Ontario prefers to take a more mystical approach
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 13106827)
NB is still recording numbers? Ontario prefers to take a more mystical approach
|
Re: Coronavirus
Seems like we will be forever in this viral loop if we don't try and move past the daily counts and constant media attention about bringing back masks or other restrictions. So many recent reports with different sources calling for masks to be reintroduced and saying restrictions are lifting too early but in reality when is the right time? Because we know after lifting restrictions cases will climb, we also know that other countries like UK who lifted them earlier saw an increase and then it plateaued so we cannot jump up and down and stamp our feet when cases go up because its not if but when they increase, it's a known fact they will go up. Of course we don't want to see surgeries being cancelled and elderly people being hidden away to protect them but a lot of the issues we are seeing now are severe staff shortages everywhere due to sickness and we know that it has become the thing now to stay home if sick yet not everyone who is sick has COVID and not everyone is actually sick of course. Some modelling "expert" the other day was calling for masks to be reintroduced as cases were climbing higher than they should and they suggested we needed to slow it down yet how will this work in the real world where social distancing is gone, no limits on gatherings, no limits on capacity at pubs/restaurants and a free for all at your private home? Unless you bring back multiple restrictions wearing a mask inside a grocery store or shopping mall is not going to achieve any serious reduction.
How many health care professionals are off sick having caught the virus from a shopping trip or visit to their nearest library versus how many caught it socializing with pals at home, in the pub or restaurant? Summer is fast approaching and already they are predicting sell out hotels, camping spots and air bnb, all the previous summer events that have been cancelled last 2 years are back on this year so locally in Kelowna we can expect a population explosion this summer and with it no doubt increase in cases yet would it make any difference if we were to have kept restrictions in place a bit longer? We are not going for the "zero COVID" approach so inevitably we will see cases rise but what is the right call here? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 13106890)
.....
How many health care professionals are off sick having caught the virus from a shopping trip or visit to their nearest library versus how many caught it socializing with pals at home, in the pub or restaurant? ... There is also nothing wrong with health care workers going shopping, visiting the library, etc - or are you suggesting they should be isolating from all when not in work? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.