Help wanted WW2!
#108
I approved this message







Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,425
From: Chicago











My suggestion to the OP is that after the trading of insults is over, use this as an opportunity to educate the ignorant SOBs about the horror of the Blitz, about city blocks being turned into rubble, about people dieing in their houses, nightly air raids , children being evacuated to the country and about the defense in the Battle of Britain. Then tell him about how all this was done not in some far off land, but in your Grandparents back yard as his Grandparents were listening to it on the radio news over two years before Pearl Harbor.
They might tell you to piss off, but they might also think twice about being so flippant when it comes to such a glorious, hideous, triumphant, horrific time in both our histories.
They might tell you to piss off, but they might also think twice about being so flippant when it comes to such a glorious, hideous, triumphant, horrific time in both our histories.
#110
How about, Im sure all the allied countries that lost thousands and thousands of men/women fighting to save democracy will be pleased to know the States is showing their dead such disrespect for risking their lives.....!
#113
That means that when you are dealing with people who make ignorant comments you do not lower yourself to their level in ignorance. IF you feel you must make a comeback then make an intelligent one. You can make a point without being argumentative and/or heavy handed. Logic wins out over emotion in that case.
#114
Homebody










Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,190
From: HOME











That means that when you are dealing with people who make ignorant comments you do not lower yourself to their level in ignorance. IF you feel you must make a comeback then make an intelligent one. You can make a point without being argumentative and/or heavy handed. Logic wins out over emotion in that case.
The people who made the original comment were both rude and wrong and deserve a heavy-handed reply.
#115
Personally I didn't care for it.
I repeat you don't have to lower yourself to the same level, that defeats the whole purpose of correcting misinformation.
#116
Account Closed










Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,455


I felt Sue was pointing out to them that other countries lost many also?
#120
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,220









I suspect that the US had enough manpower and materiel to win alone in Europe with minimal help, as was largely the case in the Pacific. Yes, it would have been bloodier, more painful and taken a lot longer, and no, that does not denigrate the efforts of all of the other Allies. But nonetheless, the US would have won eventually just so long as it had the UK to serve as a large immobile aircraft carrier from which to establish a beachhead.
The whole thing sounds like your co-workers are just taking the piss. Since they probably don't know much about the UK aside from England being in London (or something like that) and the Queen looking like Helen Mirren, they probably don't have much material to work with. Make fun of McDonald's or something, you'll come up with a potshot or two, I'm sure...
I will add to this tomorrow...when I have a bit more time and inclination to educate you a bit more on the real history of your country as your (and nearly every other) elementary school only gave you the rose coloured version.
Paul Revere midnight ride my arse.






