Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > The Trailer Park
Reload this Page >

Relaxing Gun Control

Relaxing Gun Control

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 3:04 pm
  #46  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

For those who did not get it, such matter are regulated at State level.

Colorado you need a background check, Gun Show, Individual Sale whatever.

I would expect Chicago and California to be the same.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 3:26 pm
  #47  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
mrken30's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Portlandia Metro
Posts: 7,425
mrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by Boiler
For those who did not get it, such matter are regulated at State level.

Colorado you need a background check, Gun Show, Individual Sale whatever.

I would expect Chicago and California to be the same.
Same in Oregon, you cannot lend your gun to anyone either. Iis fairly easy to buy privately, just look at something like https://www.northwestfirearms.com/
mrken30 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 4:24 pm
  #48  
 
thinbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 987
thinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond reputethinbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by dc koop
Here's something to think about. If Trump intends to relax gun controls even more but at the same time plans to stop the murder rate in Chicago isn't this a bit like a firefighter holding a water hose in one hand and pouring gasoline on the fire with the other hand ?
That analogy holds about as much weight as a counter argument that it is like a firefighter holding a water hose but also giving residents their own fire extinguishers.
thinbrit is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 5:03 pm
  #49  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by mrken30
Same in Oregon, you cannot lend your gun to anyone either. Iis fairly easy to buy privately, just look at something like https://www.northwestfirearms.com/
Same here, go to the shooting range and you well legally can not borrow a friends gun to shoot, or swap whatever.

Always wondered how they gat around it with rentals or loaners. Perhaps just ignore it.

But when you have clueless politicians involved you get what you get.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 6:32 pm
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Location: california
Posts: 6,035
dc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by thinbrit
That analogy holds about as much weight as a counter argument that it is like a firefighter holding a water hose but also giving residents their own fire extinguishers.
Problem with that analogy is that a lot of residents shouldn't have fire extinguishers
dc koop is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 6:52 pm
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Location: california
Posts: 6,035
dc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond reputedc koop has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by Boiler
For those who did not get it, such matter are regulated at State level.

Colorado you need a background check, Gun Show, Individual Sale whatever.

I would expect Chicago and California to be the same.
Occasionally the LAPD or County Sheriffs Department grant an amnesty period whereby gun owners can turn in their firearms registered or unregistered no questions asked but in gang banger areas that's only scratching the surface. However the California Three Strikes law got rid of a lot of gang members who moved to other cities. Unfortunately that law has now been discontinued.

What should be done in Chicago's problem area is a massive sweep of that area using National Guard or State Militia as backup and every known gang member's house searched from top to bottom and any and all weapons confiscated. No gang member should own a weapon and it should be a crime punishable by a heavy fine and a few years in the slammer if they're caught

Would this happen? Answer is no because politicians are so traumatized by political correctness and an abject fear of being labeled racists that they're in a state of near paralysis when it comes to dealing with problems in black neighbourhoods.

There's also a state of denial coupled with the above attitude. The BLM doesn't seem to accept the fact that most black deaths are caused amongst themselves but instead have convinced themselves that white cops are killing them wholesale. They live in a world of unreality and self delusion

Last edited by dc koop; Mar 2nd 2017 at 6:58 pm.
dc koop is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 6:58 pm
  #52  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by dc koop
Occasionally the LAPD or County Sheriffs Departments grant an amnesty period whereby gun owners can turn in their firearms registered or unregistered no questions asked but in gang banger areas that's only scratching the surface. However the California Three Strikes law got rid of a lot of gang members who moved to other cities. Unfortunately that law has now been discontinued.

What should be done in Chicago's problem area is a massive sweep of that area using National Guard or State Militia as backup and every known gang member's house searched from top to bottom and any and all weapons confiscated. No gang member should own a weapon and it should be a crime punishable by a heavy fine and a few years in the slammer if they're caught

Would this happen? Answer is no because politicians are so traumatized by political correctness and an abject fear of being labeled racists that they're in a state of near paralysis when it comes to dealing with problems in black neighbourhoods.

There's also a state of denial coupled with the above attitude. The BLM doesn't seem to accept the fact that most black deaths are caused amongst themselves but instead think that it's white cops who are killing them wholesale. They live in a world of unreality and self delusion
Votes first!
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 7:07 pm
  #53  
 
lansbury's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 9,966
lansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond reputelansbury has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by mrken30
Same in Oregon, you cannot lend your gun to anyone either.
Do all gun transfers require background checks?

Some transfers do not require background check, such as:

  • Transfers between immediate family members,
  • Temporary transfers for self-defense, hunting, and target-shooting; and
  • Temporary transfers that occur exclusively while in the presence of the owner.
lansbury is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 7:13 pm
  #54  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Seems Colorado has taken into account some of the initial stupidity, now reads:

In Colorado, almost all firearm transfers between unlicensed persons must be processed by a licensed firearms dealer, subjecting the prospective purchaser to a background check.

In 2013, Colorado enacted a law requiring gun sellers who are not federally licensed dealers to initiate a background check when transferring a firearm. With the exceptions listed below, any unlicensed individual who seeks to transfer possession of a firearm to a prospective transferee must: 1) require that a background check is conducted on the prospective transferee by a licensed gun dealer; and 2) obtain approval of the transfer from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) following the background check request.1

If the transferee is an entity (e.g. a business), then a background check must be conducted on each person who is authorized by the entity to possess a firearm.2

When a licensed dealer obtains a background check on a prospective transferee, the dealer must record the transfer and retain the records in the same manner as when conducting a sale, rental or exchange at retail. The dealer must also provide the transferor and transferee with a copy of the results of the background check, including CBI’s approval or disapproval of the transfer.3

A dealer may charge a fee of up to $10 for conducting a background check for an unlicensed seller.4

A transferee cannot accept possession of the firearm from an unlicensed seller until CBI approves the transfer. The transfer must be completed within 30 days of that approval.5

A transferee is prohibited from knowingly providing false information to a prospective transferor or to a licensed dealer for the purpose of acquiring a firearm.6

These transfer provisions do not apply to, inter alia:

A bona fide gift or loan between immediate family members;
A transfer that occurs by operation of law or because of the death of a person for whom the prospective transferor is an executor or administrator of an estate or a trustee of a trust created in a will;
A transfer that is temporary and occurs while in the home of the unlicensed transferee if:
The unlicensed transferee is not prohibited from possessing firearms; and
The unlicensed transferee reasonably believes that possession of the firearm is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily injury to the unlicensed transferee;
A temporary transfer of possession without power of ownership or a title to ownership, which takes place:
At a shooting range located in or on premises owned by a duly incorporated organization organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in firearms;
At a target firearm shooting competition under the auspices of, or approved by, a state agency or a nonprofit organization; or
While hunting, fishing, target shooting, or trapping if:
Legal in all places where the unlicensed transferee possesses the firearm; and
The unlicensed transferee holds any license or permit that is required for such activity;
A transfer of a firearm that is made to facilitate the repair or maintenance of the firearm, except that all parties who possess the firearm as part of such transaction must be able to legally possess a firearm;
Any temporary transfer that occurs while in the continuous presence of the owner of the firearm;
A temporary transfer for not more than 72 hours. A person who makes such a temporary transfer may be jointly and severally liable for damages proximately caused by the transferee’s subsequent unlawful use of the firearm; or
A member of the armed services who will be deployed outside of the U.S. in the next 30 days, to any immediate family member.7
When a person violates the above transfer requirements, the violation is punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor and the person must be prohibited from possessing a firearm for two years, beginning on the date of his or her conviction.8 When a person is convicted, the State Court Administrator must report the conviction to CBI and to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The report must include information indicating that the person is prohibited from possessing a firearm for two years, beginning on the date of his or her conviction.9
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 9:09 pm
  #55  
Grumpy Know-it-all
 
Steve_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 8,928
Steve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

When it comes to "private transfers" as they are known, the one point that is usually glossed over is that it only applies to intrastate transfers. A person resident in Arizona can privately sell a gun to another person resident in Arizona but transfers across State lines are completely illegal. They have to be done via an FFL. The only exception are transfers by bequest.

FFLs can transfer a rifle or a shotgun to a resident of another State provided they comply with the laws of both States, which is often impossible.

So this idea that Joe Blow from NYC can go to a gun show in Philadelphia and buy a gun without breaking a law is nonsense. It's illegal for him to buy it, it's illegal for the seller to sell it to him and it's illegal to transport it across the State line. The problem is the law is rarely enforced. It is in fact the first section of the Gun Control Act, 18 USC 922(a)(1)(A), because Lee Harvey Oswald bought his rifle from a company in Illinois.

It's also illegal to send handguns through the mail, except between licenced dealers.

People are so ignorant of the law there's a proposal in Congress to make trafficking illegal. It already is illegal, the penalties are severe.

Personally I think anyone selling a gun privately to a stranger is an idiot anyway, at the very least you should ask to see ID to make sure they live in the same State.
Steve_ is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 9:12 pm
  #56  
BE Forum Addict
 
tom169's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Location: NC, USA (ex Yorkshire)
Posts: 4,375
tom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond reputetom169 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Not sure if there is some reciprocity agreement between NC and SC, but rifles and shotguns can easily be bought from FFL's by residents of either state. However, handguns can't be.
tom169 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 9:21 pm
  #57  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Well to go from Colorado to any other state neatby is a bit of a drive. I have bought on line but need to do the pick up at a FFL and do the paperwork.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2017, 9:22 pm
  #58  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,170
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by Steve_
When it comes to "private transfers" as they are known, the one point that is usually glossed over is that it only applies to intrastate transfers. A person resident in Arizona can privately sell a gun to another person resident in Arizona but transfers across State lines are completely illegal. They have to be done via an FFL. The only exception are transfers by bequest.

FFLs can transfer a rifle or a shotgun to a resident of another State provided they comply with the laws of both States, which is often impossible.

So this idea that Joe Blow from NYC can go to a gun show in Philadelphia and buy a gun without breaking a law is nonsense. It's illegal for him to buy it, it's illegal for the seller to sell it to him and it's illegal to transport it across the State line. The problem is the law is rarely enforced. It is in fact the first section of the Gun Control Act, 18 USC 922(a)(1)(A), because Lee Harvey Oswald bought his rifle from a company in Illinois.
That's the thing though, it's so easy to do and there's no requirement to ask for ID, so as long as you aren't obviously parking your out of state car in front of the person, there's no reason for the seller to believe you're from out of state.

Sure, it's illegal to buy it and move it out of state, but it's sure easier than stealing a gun. Now you can flog it for a lot more money out where ever you wanted to flog guns on the street.
Bob is offline  
Old Mar 3rd 2017, 2:59 am
  #59  
Turning into a PA gal!
 
lizzyq's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Location: State College PA, finally!
Posts: 3,563
lizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond reputelizzyq has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

This must be a record breaking post for length from Boiler � ����
Originally Posted by Boiler
Seems Colorado has taken into account some of the initial stupidity, now reads:

In Colorado, almost all firearm transfers between unlicensed persons must be processed by a licensed firearms dealer, subjecting the prospective purchaser to a background check.....

<content snipped - see original post>

Last edited by lizzyq; Mar 3rd 2017 at 3:16 am. Reason: excess verbiage removed :)
lizzyq is offline  
Old Mar 3rd 2017, 3:29 am
  #60  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat097 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Relaxing Gun Control

Originally Posted by lizzyq
This must be a record breaking post for length from Boiler � ����
I was thinking the same thing.

Mind you there is nothing like a gun thread to get most of these guys frantically posting away..
scrubbedexpat097 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.