![]() |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696671)
I'm confused. We should say me neither?
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696671)
I'm confused. We should say me neither?
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11696675)
That's what I've always been used to saying. Isn't that the English way?
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696668)
Irregardless is a perfectly good word that I like to use on occasion.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11696673)
No it's not, it is a made up word that is entirely unnecessary and in any case is invariably used to mean "regardless".
. :(
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11696675)
That's what I've always been used to saying. Isn't that the English way?
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696685)
If you eliminated "made up words" from the vocabulary, there wouldn't be much left. How do think a language evolves?
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696685)
If you eliminated "made up words" from the vocabulary, there wouldn't be much left. How do think a language evolves? ......
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11696686)
Jesus gave us English, when he wrote the Bible.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11696687)
America seems remarkably good at creating new words that mean exactly the same as other words that already exist, therefore the new words contribute absolutely nothing to effective communication either for science or the arts. Such words are parasitic growths that eventually squeeze out the original word. I blame poor education standards myself. :unsure:
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11696687)
America seems remarkably good at creating new words that mean exactly the same as other words that already exist, therefore the new words contribute absolutely nothing to effective communication either for science or the arts. Such words are parasitic growths that eventually squeeze out the original word. I blame poor education standards myself. :unsure:
So what did King James do? :confused: |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11696689)
It would be interesting to know what makes these new words gain traction. What is it in American culture that fosters people to adopt winningest, deplane and burglarized.
"Deplane" I put down to ignorance of the word disembark, which does perfectly well. Does "winningest" have a one-word synonym? It's ugly, but I can see why it was invented. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696661)
To say "that have signs in kilometers". What is wrong with "train station"?
Your instead of you're - makes me cringe. Amusing snippet on the radio the other day: there is a trend here now to say things like for all intensive purposes (instead of for all intents and purposes) and to say never regions (instead of nether regions). There were other ghastly examples as well. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11696687)
America seems remarkably good at creating new words that mean exactly the same as other words that already exist
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11696689)
It would be interesting to know what makes these new words gain traction. What is it in American culture that fosters people to adopt winningest, deplane and burglarized.
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11696693)
Does "winningest" have a one-word synonym? It's ugly, but I can see why it was invented.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11696693)
Does "winningest" have a one-word synonym? It's ugly, but I can see why it was invented.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11696699)
'Best' would do. Or at a pinch, the two-word 'most successful' is more than adequate.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11696702)
...... Winningest would be pretty much meaningless in cricket or football.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Maud Araminta
(Post 11696661)
To say "that have signs in kilometers". What is wrong with "train station"?
Your instead of you're - makes me cringe. Amusing snippet on the radio the other day: there is a trend here now to say things like for all intensive purposes (instead of for all intents and purposes) and to say never regions (instead of nether regions). There were other ghastly examples as well. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:29 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.