Every??? Wow, discriminating, aren't you!

Every arse? No, only the nice ones. I also stare at big knockers and dribble lightly, too ...

Every single woman is not squatting daily just so I can store an image of their arse in the visual wank bank. A lot of them have arses that are utterly unappealing to me.

No I'm not. I'm quite standard, actually. Good guess on me being an arse man though. I like big butts, I cannot lie.

I don't think The Sultan is unique. I have seen more than my share of female arses, both in my office and on the street. Far too many of them are immense, and covered with lycra pants so tight that you can see every dimple of cellulite from the waistband to the ankles. It can turn your stomach - and I don't know how those pants could be anywhere near as comfortable as a skirt or dress that would camouflage what the world shouldn't see. Personally, I appreciate a nice 36 C chest.

As for how Bill could hurt Hillary's campaign, it's very simple. If she plays the woman card, she'll be hit with the fact that she managed the "bimbo eruptions" defence - where she engineered the public destruction of every woman who came forth to accuse him of improper behaviour. And then she has the gall to state that women who are the victims of rape or other similar improper behaviour should be believed.

The Republican candidate's campaign against her would be better focused on her total ineptitude as Secretary of State and that she pushed Obama into the policy that brought down Gaddafi and left Libya as a dangerous failed state - as simply one example of her lack of competence to be President - and there are many more. Further, to highlight her propensity to lie and mislead, as when she met the families of the Bengazi dead and blamed the video when she knew and had emailed the President of Libya that it was a pure terrorist attack. Save the bimbo crap as a counter, and let her know it's there if she plays the other card.

Your first paragraph made me laugh. Glad you joined us in the devolution into filth.

The second paragraph outlines exactly what I was talking about. Implicate Hillary in the mess surrounding Bill's philandering. I get the strategy. I just wonder if it will work on swing voters. Or does it just work on the people that already believe it?

I would participate in this conversation but somebody reminded me that females have buttocks and now I am just a hot mess.

I've lost half of the brain trust.

It's where I belong, Leslie.

Would it work with the independents/undecided/fence sitters to point out that she ran the "bimbo eruptions" defence and thus paint her as a hypocrite - if she plays the woman card? I don't think it would hurt to use it at that time. Otherwise steer clear. The election will probably be more affected by the economy, if it sinks next year.

The election should be about the economy --- all elections should really. It could also be about security, specially if all of the murder/death/kill stuff keeps up at this rate.

I am asking, in earnest, how does Hillary navigate the "woman" thing? You have answered as to what your response to her would be and I don't think it's a particularly unusual position among voters.

Does Hillary need to highlight a 'war on women'?
You mentioned Obama declining to address racial motives behind attacks on him in his election ultimately being a successful tactic.

Let me ask you this: will female voters be more inclined to vote for Hillary because of her gender, or not?

Trump just talks like a half cocked red neck loudmouth. If he didn't plaster his fake hair down with heavy duty female hair spray he'd look like a Cone head in a high wind

Well, there you go. Seems you aren't unique after all. You seem to have it down to an art.

With respect to Bill, no doubt he shares the very same instinct that you and all men share. The difference is the resistance to temptation. Bill obviously failed at that, and the consequences are a matter of history.

But Hillary needs to avoid playing the "sexism" card, not only because it's beneath a commander and chief, but it's not what the focus of the campaign should be. If she wins the office, that alone will speak volumes about women's roles in society.

Speaking of arses, I'm not quite sure which of the present two front runners is the biggest.

All blokes window shop. That's just biology. It was more the implication you made that we are all running around with enormous erections like dogs on heat trying to stick it in every hole we can find that I was satirizing. Honestly, most of the time I'm thinking about how much time I'm going to get to play my computer that night, or if I'll ever have enough money to buy all the gear I want, when I'm distracted out of that line of thought by a nice arse, or pair of tits.

Since I'm married, that just doesn't tend to come from home as much as I'd like it to. But that's why we have internet porn.

Bill Clinton is not in any way unique either. Plenty of men dip their wick, especially presidents. Doesn't make them bad people. Whatever problems Clinton had in the knobbing arena didn't change the fact that he was one of the best presidents we have had in a long time.

I agree that Hillary needs to avoid the sexism argument, in the same way Obama played down the race angle. She has enough going for her that has gained her the support she has without having to do that.

Trump, easily. Say what you like about Hillary, but if she were to win the presidency (which she likely would against any of the GOP front runners), we really wouldn't see much of a change. Just like we haven't really seen that much of a change under Obama, despite what people would like to say, because he can barely get a thing past a Republican congress that has made it its mission to block everything he does, rather than try to make an America that is the best it can be for its people.

Not that I want her to win...but I think her best course would be to avoid raising the "woman thing."

When she goes in front of the audience and the cameras, people can see she's a woman, and there is a certain irreducible number of women who would vote for her solely on the basis that she, along with them, has ovaries. If Trump, or the R candidate raises it, she gets an add-on sympathy vote from yet more women, some of them even independents who might not otherwise vote.

Here's what Trump's done:

http://www.toilette-humor.com/christ...balloons.shtml

Trump, no contest. He wears a suit immaculately tailored to attempt to hide all the bulk, never fastening his jacket as another means of camouflaging the gut. Just another clue to the extent of the man's vanity.