Yes, why not?

Not that that is a relevant example.

It's a very relevant example of your vacuity around this subject.

I'm pretty sure plenty of Muslims have condemned this.

I didn't see you condemning the rape that JamesM posted about, maybe you secretly support it yeah? I mean it's the only logical conclusion given a moderate man like yourself says nothing. Perhaps if you condemned rapists more then maybe they'd think WTF am I doing before they rape somebody.

lets see, there was the brother of the murdered cop, the muslim guy who helped people to hide. There were these guys

French imams rail against 'crazies who have seized our religion'

Likewise.

Saw this the other day:

Three kind of deniers:
- Darwin deniers
- Climate-change deniers
- Jihad deniers

You've conquered the first two, one more to go.

What is a jihad denier?

A small step in the right direction. Looking forward to a million French muslims marching on this topic. As Caretaker suggested, it's early days, so it may yet happen.

My point is that moderates need to be more vocal and more effective than they have been. Plenty of individuals and imams express anger and frustration here and there (and so they should).

Someone who denies that jihad (in the "holy war") sense is taking place.

Fairly thick, at least a 100 I would say otherwise it wouldn't be dense enough to make a burka

count up will you?
Paris march balloons into France’s largest demonstration ever, with up to 1.6 million people flooding streets | National Post

see if the demographics are ok for you

60 million French people and only 1.6 out there demonstrating? Those moderate Christians should be more vocal

Eh? Everyone can see what is happening, does it really matter how they characterize it?

I dislike religion as much as the next atheist, but it seems to me that you are letting rhetoric cloud your judgement a little. As Novo says you appear to be holding this ideology to a different standard to others.

Did you demand any kind of demonstrations (let alone "million man" ones) when the Catholics were busy diddling kids?

I've been watching it on TV. Many people. No demographic info, unfortunately.

Everyone can be more vocal against fundamentalist Islam, but it is the moderate Muslims who must be most vocal. They, presumably, have the expert knowledge to counter the arguments of the fundamentalists.

Why must they? Why must people who have done nothing wrong do anything?

I missed that one, I may have condemned the rape but as I said I missed it so can't comment.

I did add that we should make it difficult to obtain guns when the last US shooting took place. But that won't happen.

If you take time to read the name of THIS thread, you will notice it's a hint as to what it's about, it is a thread on what to do about "Islamic" fundamentalists. Hence why some have mentioned that scenario more than the Christians or rapes or world wars or pollution in China.

Doesn't this ideology (the extreme part) hold itself to a different standard?

Their actions - 10 year old suicide bombers, gun attacks on offices and supermarkets, hacking people to death, beheading, flying jets into skyscrapers etc - are somewhat more extreme than what we see from the lunatic christian right I reckon.