![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Trump now fearing a 3rd party run against him? Bizarre!
In another boisterous victory speech-press conference combo, Trump called on Sen. Marco Rubio to leave the race and suggested that he might not even bother to campaign if the “#NeverTrump†movement challenges him in the general election. Such a move, he warned, would guarantee Hillary Clinton a chance to replace the late conservative justice Antonin Scalia.“If they run a third party or an independent party, if they do that, it will make it impossible for the Republican candidate, on the assumption it’s me, to win,†Trump said. “The Democrats would have an absolute free run. Probably you wouldn’t even campaign because it would be impossible to win.†|
Re: 2016 Election
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by McZaki
(Post 11887368)
Cruz, cruising off to a thumping victory over Trump in Kansas and Maine, crap!
America, you're such a disappointment! I was looking forward to an entertaining Presidential contest between Trump and Mrs. Clinton....please don't give up on the wackiness, and keep voting Trump :p |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11887815)
If we end up with the brokered GOP convention that I am expecting, then that could be very entertaining, especially if the establishment succeeds in denying the nomination to both Trump and Cruz.
The other thing is that everyone is piling on the Never Trump bus. But the alternative of Cruz is not any better, possibly worse. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11887828)
If the voting keeps going like it has so far, I can't see how they can possibly give it to anyone but Trump or Cruz.
The other thing is that everyone is piling on the Never Trump bus. But the alternative of Cruz is not any better, possibly worse. With a brokered convention, the GOP establishment may try to craft a "unity ticket" of sorts that it can live with. Of course, that may not work, as it will need to convince at least some Cruz and/or Trump delegates to switch to this yet-to-be-determined other candidate, one who will presumably have little in common with their preferred candidate. The establishment has really failed here, with Bush and Ryan both out and Kasich barely holding on. But if Kasich can win Ohio, then the odds of the brokered convention go up considerably. |
Re: 2016 Election
A brokered convention could cause enough infighting to really destroy the party. Pulling the nomination from Trump could cause many of his supporters to stay home on election night. It would not be a bad thing for the party to implode so it has a chance to rebuild without the hate and ignorance the has developed over the years. We need a rational 2nd party not afraid to compromise. Although I would not be surprised to see a 3rd party emerge, and not a pretty one.
|
Re: 2016 Election
At the brokered convention...can a 3rd person be added...someone who hasn't been in the running up to that date?
Anyone think Mitt will jump in to 'save' the GOP at the last minute? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11887849)
At the brokered convention...can a 3rd person be added...someone who hasn't been in the running up to that date?
Anyone think Mitt will jump in to 'save' the GOP at the last minute? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11887849)
At the brokered convention...can a 3rd person be added...someone who hasn't been in the running up to that date?
Anyone think Mitt will jump in to 'save' the GOP at the last minute? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11887860)
Who will save the Dems from Hillary?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11887863)
They can put forth another candidate...but then it becomes a task of getting other candidates delegates to switch. Not an easy task.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11887849)
At the brokered convention...can a 3rd person be added...someone who hasn't been in the running up to that date?
Anyone think Mitt will jump in to 'save' the GOP at the last minute? Technically, they can put forward anybody they want. The individual states still have to approve but, if the fix is in, they'll fall in line. I just don't see the fix being feasible within such a fractured party. This used to be how it was always done. The primaries and (stupid) caucuses are a relatively new construct. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11887866)
Boiler for President. :thumbsup:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11887874)
Technically, they can put forward anybody they want. The individual states still have to approve but, if the fix is in, they'll fall in line. I just don't see the fix being feasible within such a fractured party.
This used to be how it was always done. The primaries and (stupid) caucuses are a relatively new construct. Lay in this morning? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11887871)
Where is the democracy...when the GOP decides against US citizens' wishes...that they will decide who will run for President?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:21 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.