Re: 2016 Election
 

Couple of thoughts.

I thought the gun conversation was riveting and they both dug in.

This is the most I've seen Clinton pressed so much on Bill's record from the 90s - both from Sanders and the moderators/questioners. I'm not convinced that's actually fair but I'm surprised it's taken this long.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Now we are on Super Predators

She has covered dismantling the US Gun Industry.

Re: 2016 Election
 

She did very well on both scores, especially liability for gun manufacturers. It really is absurd that Congress was bribed by the gun lobby into giving gun manufacturers a level of protection that no other industry has.

I think anything she said in the '90's is fair game, but it's a stretch to hold her husband's policies against her.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Here's an exhaustive list of detailed explanations:

-She's bad.

-She's terrible.

-She's horrible.

-She's awful.

-She's really not good.

As you can see, a lot of thought goes into this sort of thing.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Might want to listen to what she says, Bernie did and called her on it.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Regardless, it's an absurd notion gun manufacturers should be liable for homicides and would set a dangerous precedent. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is a retard

Re: 2016 Election
 

That is not what Clinton proposed; she wants to repeal the law that gave gun manufacturers carte blanche immunity.

Unable to debate without throwing an insult in?

Re: 2016 Election
 

Listen to what she said.

Re: 2016 Election
 

I thought so too.

Guns are a clear delineation between the two candidates.

I believe that she's being held to a higher standard than anybody else insofar as Bill's record goes. Back in the day, Bernie wasn't even a Democrat and Trump was dabbling in everything.

Re: 2016 Election
 

We're too busy trying to figure out what you're saying.

Re: 2016 Election
 

"Compare the substance of this debate with what happened on the Republican stage last week".

Yep.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Much easier to have a debate on substance when there's only 2 candidates

Re: 2016 Election
 

That suggests every word she utters is a problem for you, which doesn't seem reasonable. I'm not asking for a transcript of everything she's ever said, I'm asking for a few examples of what she would specifically do that bothers you so much.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Very poor excuse for the Republican circus clowns

Re: 2016 Election
 

You're talking about Trump

The others have lots of substance but you obviously have to take the blinkers off to appreciate that