British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   2016 Election (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/2016-election-855107/)

zargof Apr 20th 2016 12:45 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 11927348)
"Following Bernies Sanders New York upset, campaign manager Jeff Weaver appeared on MSNBC to say even if Hillary Clinton wins the all the delegates required to secure the nomination and leads the popular vote, the Vermont senator's campaign would fight to flip superdelegates all the way to the convention. "It's going to be an election determined by the superdelegates," he said, contradicting the campaign's previous power-by-the people rhetoric. "

Apparently Sanders no longer believes in the will of the voters.

Man running for President would quite like to win nomination shocker. Spinning the race to keep the fundraising spigot on is not a new phenomenon.

RoadWarriorFromLP Apr 20th 2016 1:43 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11927627)
Man running for President would quite like to win nomination shocker. Spinning the race to keep the fundraising spigot on is not a new phenomenon.

Not surprising, just hypocritical.

Giantaxe Apr 20th 2016 2:30 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by themadpooper (Post 11927410)
Sanders is the candidate of choice for several demographics, seemingly the only people who vote for Clinton are African Americans and Democrat loyalists.

Are black votes only worth three-fifths of white votes :confused:

Someone remind me how far ahead in the popular vote Clinton is... oh, here we go:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ote_count.html

So 10.4 to 7.7m.

zargof Apr 20th 2016 3:10 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 11927718)
Are black votes only worth three-fifths of white votes :confused:

Someone remind me how far ahead in the popular vote Clinton is... oh, here we go:

RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

So 10.4 to 7.7m.

What's strange is the different narrative on the Republican side where Trump is up by 2.3m votes and yet he is struggling to win the nomination.

zargof Apr 20th 2016 3:13 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP (Post 11927676)
Not surprising, just hypocritical.

Agreed, turns out Sanders is a politician after all.

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 20th 2016 3:17 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 11927577)
Drug advocate? Is that a job? :cool:

Seems to be quite a few in Colorado.

jjmb Apr 20th 2016 3:18 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
OK, having been following this conversation for several months now but what does 'WFP' mean? The only thing I can find is World Food Program.

dakota44 Apr 20th 2016 3:21 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by jjmb (Post 11927761)
OK, having been following this conversation for several months now but what does 'WFP' mean? The only thing I can find is World Food Program.

Working Families Party.

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 20th 2016 3:25 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...y_logo.svg.png

robin1234 Apr 20th 2016 3:29 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by jjmb (Post 11927761)
OK, having been following this conversation for several months now but what does 'WFP' mean? The only thing I can find is World Food Program.


Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 11927765)
Working Families Party.

Yeah sorry. It's a big thing in New York, because here, we can have multiple parties endorsing the same candidate. So Democratic Party and WFP endorse the same candidate for President or for US Senator (for instance,) but each party vies to get votes on their line. On the political right, we have Republicans and Conservatives here in New York. (Conservatives are like Republicans, but a bit more angry and batshit.)

dakota44 Apr 20th 2016 3:35 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
The WFP was, by some opinions, supposed to be Bernies saviour in NY. Ooops.

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 20th 2016 3:36 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
We're heading for an American first: Trump vs Clinton – a presidential fight between two hated candidates | Voices | The Independent

Going to get nasty

Giantaxe Apr 20th 2016 3:50 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11927754)
What's strange is the different narrative on the Republican side where Trump is up by 2.3m votes and yet he is struggling to win the nomination.

Wishful thinking on the part of the Republican establishment.

sir_eccles Apr 20th 2016 4:29 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Perhaps, though I think the polls indicate more Dems will shrug and vote Hillary than Reps shrug and vote Trump.

Trump also has the etch a sketch problem. You can't just shake your campaign and start again from scratch.

jjmb Apr 20th 2016 5:16 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Now it looks like Clinton v Trump, I suppose we should be wondering who the VP picks will be and I wonder if that will be deciding factor. I will vote democrat but I really cannot stand Hilary Clinton, especially when she pulls those faces of her, they just come across as smug, condescending and false.
Also both of them turn 69/70 this year, so unlikely be 2 term Presidents, so the VP will be of utmost importance to both parties, I would imagine.

Did anyone see Paul Ryan on the
last night. Definitely a back room pick if it comes down to a third/fourth ballot.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:45 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.