British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   2016 Election (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/2016-election-855107/)

kimilseung Apr 19th 2016 2:14 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by robin1234 (Post 11926688)
Registered for WFP,

What advantage dose registering as a WFP give? Why would someone do it? (I am assuming there is not a state organized primary for the WFP).

Leslie Apr 19th 2016 2:38 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
Good God. Hillary is giving a frikkin acceptance speech.

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 19th 2016 2:40 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 11927299)
Good God. Hillary is giving a frikkin acceptance speech.

:drinkingbeer:

I need something to take the taste away.

Leslie Apr 19th 2016 2:46 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Boiler (Post 11927302)
:drinkingbeer:

I need something to take the taste away.

You better order a keg 'cause this how it's gonna be from now on. :lol:

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 19th 2016 2:48 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
I have one to hand, Backcountry Pale.

MMcD Apr 19th 2016 3:00 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 11927299)
Good God. Hillary is giving a frikkin acceptance speech.

...during the course of which was amused to watch (CNN) her 20% lead drop by 5%. Right now it's winnowed further: With 87% of vote counted it's Clinton 57.3% to Sanders 42.7%

Yeah even tho she clearly won NY, Hillary's speech was a manifestation of presumption gumption

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 19th 2016 3:34 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDngzpgWgAA3mm4.jpg

Giantaxe Apr 19th 2016 4:04 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by MMcD (Post 11927320)
...during the course of which was amused to watch (CNN) her 20% lead drop by 5%. Right now it's winnowed further: With 87% of vote counted it's Clinton 57.3% to Sanders 42.7%

Yeah even tho she clearly won NY, Hillary's speech was a manifestation of presumption gumption

It's a huge step towards Clinton winning the nomination, whichever way you want to cut it. And Clinton is significantly ahead in the polls for the three remaining large states, namely Maryland, New Jersey and California.

RoadWarriorFromLP Apr 19th 2016 4:33 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
As of tonight, Clinton has received 57% of the total number of votes that have been cast for either Clinton or Sanders. Which is to say that she is leading by 14 points.

How can anyone possibly argue with a straight face that this is a tight race when she's essentially winning by a landslide?

dakota44 Apr 19th 2016 5:10 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
"Following Bernies Sanders New York upset, campaign manager Jeff Weaver appeared on MSNBC to say even if Hillary Clinton wins the all the delegates required to secure the nomination and leads the popular vote, the Vermont senator's campaign would fight to flip superdelegates all the way to the convention. "It's going to be an election determined by the superdelegates," he said, contradicting the campaign's previous power-by-the people rhetoric. "

Apparently Sanders no longer believes in the will of the voters.

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 19th 2016 5:30 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
Drug advocate Charlo Greene says Hillary Clinton should 'beg for forgiveness' from black community

Drug advocate Charlo Greene says Hillary Clinton should 'beg for forgiveness' from black community | Americas | News | The Independent

scrubbedexpat099 Apr 19th 2016 5:34 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
Washington (CNN)Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton register net negative ratings in double digits, indicating the front-runners for each party's presidential nominations are viewed negatively at historic levels, according to a new CBS/New York Times poll.

That makes Trump and Clinton viewed more unfavorably than any front-runner for either party since 1984, when CBS began polling voters on the question.

Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings - CNNPolitics.com

themadpooper Apr 19th 2016 7:24 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP (Post 11927342)
As of tonight, Clinton has received 57% of the total number of votes that have been cast for either Clinton or Sanders. Which is to say that she is leading by 14 points.

How can anyone possibly argue with a straight face that this is a tight race when she's essentially winning by a landslide?



Because the Democratic Party is anything but. Clinton had the super delegates in her back pocket from day 1, take them out of the equation and the race, even after New York, is far closer than people like you clearly want to accept

Sanders is the candidate of choice for several demographics, seemingly the only people who vote for Clinton are African Americans and Democrat loyalists. Young people don't like her, people in general think she's dodgy and her New York victory speech emphasizes just how arrogant and unlikable she really is. As a Republican, I would genuinely prefer to see Sanders win the Dem nomination even knowing how well he polls against both Trump and Cruz

Leslie Apr 19th 2016 11:52 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Boiler (Post 11927353)
Drug advocate Charlo Greene says Hillary Clinton should 'beg for forgiveness' from black community

Drug advocate Charlo Greene says Hillary Clinton should 'beg for forgiveness' from black community | Americas | News | The Independent

Drug advocate? Is that a job? :cool:

robin1234 Apr 20th 2016 12:42 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by kimilseung (Post 11927295)
What advantage dose registering as a WFP give? Why would someone do it? (I am assuming there is not a state organized primary for the WFP).

I always vote for a candidate on the WFP line rather than the Democratic line (assuming they're a candidate I want to vote for.) WFP need at least a certain proportion of votes in an election, to ensure their status on the ballot in the next election. For important posts (POTUS, governor, members of congress etc.) they always endorse the same candidate as the democrats - but supposedly, as a significant bloc of organised voters on the progressive side of the political spectrum, they can push candidates to the left. Didn't really work with our present governor, who took the WFP endorsement and contemptuously ignored their political agenda, but I can see the logic of it.

Having said that, I realise I could be registered independent or democrat and still vote on the WFP line. As to why there's no WFP primary, I don't know. Probably the WFP would have to be bigger and wealthier to have one.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:20 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.