Wikiposts

Gibraltar

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 4:33 am
  #2356  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat095 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Gibraltar

LOL I've got to say I do enjoy reading this thread every day for my daily dose of ridiculousness
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 5:16 am
  #2357  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,548
la mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
We all know that you definition of morallity end with " legal ,," while for most of us actions should not just be legal but decent and honest as well.
Of course 40 tonnes compared to the catch of others is insignificant but to repeat yet again and hopefully the point will finally be driven home the self awarded quota for an endagered species makes a mockery of Gibraltar's claims to be environmentaly active in the waters around Gibraltar.

Awarding itself 40 tonnes this year,400 the next who knows ?
As Fred keeps telling us Gibraltar does not have the recourses to harvest the self awarded quota so if you believe that you will believe anything.
It is 10 tonnes, not 40.

Was an endangered species. It is not out of danger yet, but as long as the EU monitors illegal activities by Spain, Portugal etc. then stocks will replenish and a conserving fishing policy will ensue. I repeat, ICCAT has increased the EU’s quota for 2015.

By the way, Alfredo Valencia, (a Spanish environmental group) the group’s spokesman, said the fishing was being carried out “…mostly by Gibraltarian pleasure boats but, in smaller measure, by Spanish ones too”.

Dr John Cortes , (Gibraltar) Minister with responsibility for the Environment, confirmed last night (Jan 2015) that the 10 tonne figure had been reached locally and is lower than the estimate of tuna being caught locally before the regulation was in place.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 5:42 am
  #2358  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,143
From: London (mainly)/Oliva
johnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by mfh
LOL I've got to say I do enjoy reading this thread every day for my daily dose of ridiculousness
Ah, a post I can agree with.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 7:29 am
  #2359  
EMR
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724
EMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by la mancha
It is 10 tonnes, not 40.

Was an endangered species. It is not out of danger yet, but as long as the EU monitors illegal activities by Spain, Portugal etc. then stocks will replenish and a conserving fishing policy will ensue. I repeat, ICCAT has increased the EU’s quota for 2015.

By the way, Alfredo Valencia, (a Spanish environmental group) the group’s spokesman, said the fishing was being carried out “…mostly by Gibraltarian pleasure boats but, in smaller measure, by Spanish ones too”.

Dr John Cortes , (Gibraltar) Minister with responsibility for the Environment, confirmed last night (Jan 2015) that the 10 tonne figure had been reached locally and is lower than the estimate of tuna being caught locally before the regulation was in place.
At last some evidence that Fred's belief that Gibraltar did or does not have the ability to harvest bluefin tuna. Obviously these boats must be hidden in caves and only come out at night.
I prefer the evidence of the of organisations like the WWF who still classify the bluefin as one of the worlds most endagered species.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 7:34 am
  #2360  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,367
From: Mallorca
amideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
We all know that you definition of morallity end with " legal ,," while for most of us actions should not just be legal but decent and honest as well.
Of course 40 tonnes compared to the catch of others is insignificant but to repeat yet again and hopefully the point will finally be driven home the self awarded quota for an endagered species makes a mockery of Gibraltar's claims to be environmentaly active in the waters around Gibraltar.

Awarding itself 40 tonnes this year,400 the next who knows ?
As Fred keeps telling us Gibraltar does not have the recourses to harvest the self awarded quota so if you believe that you will believe anything.
Perhaps the oddest thing about this debate is that whilst there has been limitless evidence submitted to show the tonnage taken by various countries. Hundreds and thousands of tonnes, did I miss the data showing that Gib harvests even one tonne, or even a kilogram?

Does Gib actually harvest its quota, or is that simply a theoretical limit? And that theoretical limit is only a fraction of a fraction of almost any other country.

So what, exactly is your goddammed problem? You continue to do nothing more than howling at the moon for the sake of howling.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 8:31 am
  #2361  
Fredbargate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,759
From: Land of no recession
Fredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Well as a minister of the Government of Gibraltar I must admit I am dismayed at the attitude and insults that have been thrown at my country.

However bowing to the pressure of these insults I am going to open a discussion at the next meeting of Parliament ( Thursday 29th January ) to discuss the removal of the concrete reef that has caused so much hatred to be directed at Gibraltar and in so doing allow the environment to to fend for itself.
Likewise I will ask for the fishing quotas to be removed so we can move back to the peace we had before there proposed implementation.

This should save Gibraltar from being vilified in all manners of public information.

Also it will give Spain a victory they so need.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 9:06 am
  #2362  
EMR
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724
EMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by amideislas


Perhaps the oddest thing about this debate is that whilst there has been limitless evidence submitted to show the tonnage taken by various countries. Hundreds and thousands of tonnes, did I miss the data showing that Gib harvests even one tonne, or even a kilogram?

Does Gib actually harvest its quota, or is that simply a theoretical limit? And that theoretical limit is only a fraction of a fraction of almost any other country.

So what, exactly is your goddammed problem? You continue to do nothing more than howling at the moon for the sake of howling.
I take it that you have not read the post by la mancha with the statement from a minister from GiB confirming the catch of tuna.

Maybe it is difficult for you to grasp the concept of a country or person having principles.
At least we know now that Gibs claims to be environmentally conscious are just a matter of convenience or rather inconvenience when it disturbs the neighbours.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 10:06 am
  #2363  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,367
From: Mallorca
amideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
I take it that you have not read the post by la mancha with the statement from a minister from GiB confirming the catch of tuna.

Maybe it is difficult for you to grasp the concept of a country or person having principles.
At least we know now that Gibs claims to be environmentally conscious are just a matter of convenience or rather inconvenience when it disturbs the neighbours.
So your problem is Gib allowing fishing - as if Gib banned fishing, it would change the world?

If you really believe that, then I have a lovely waterfront property for a price you can't refuse. Really. Secret deal. Nobody can buy this cheap. Really, honest!
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 8:19 pm
  #2364  
Fredbargate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,759
From: Land of no recession
Fredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by Fredbargate
Margallo pressures Spanish debating forum to withdraw Picardo invitation

Date: 23 January 2015 at 12:45

An invitation to the Chief Minister to address a prestigious forum in Madrid next month has been withdrawn following pressure by the Spanish Foreign Minister. Fabian Picardo was due to speak at the Nueva Economía Fórum, that describes itself as an independent debating organisation, on the 3rd of February, but details of the talk have been removed from its website.

The Gibraltar Chronicle says there were indications on Wednesday night that José Manuel García Margallo had personally intervened to stop the event, and a Gibraltar Government spokesman has confirmed the director of the Forum telephoned on Friday morning to cancel, citing the reason as "matters of state". As the Chronicle points out, the Spanish Prime Minister recently walked arm-in-arm with David Cameron in Paris supporting the right to free speech in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings.

The decision to withdraw the invitation could also be interpreted as a snub to the UK, given that the British Ambassador, Simon Manley, was due to introduce Mr. Picardo. The Nueva Economía Fórum hosts well-known speakers every few days, usually at breakfast, with Mariano Rajoy scheduled for next week. Former Chief Minister Sir Peter Caruana was himself a guest, twice, when the socialist PSOE was in government in Spain.

Meanwhile, the Government has told GBC it's not surprised by the disgraceful actions of the Spanish Foreign Minister who, it says, suffers a distinct by-passing of democratic principles when it comes to any Gibraltar matter.

GBC | Gibraltar Broadcasting Corporation
SPONSORS ‘PRESSURED’

El Mundo, ABC and Publico were swift with online follow-ups and quoted Gibraltar Government sources as indicating that the Forum had had its sponsorship threatened. El Pais said that confidentially it had been told by a member of the Forum that there had been pressure that “could affect some if its patrons.”

QUESTIONS

Meanwhile, Catalan MP Jon Iñarritu of AMAIUR in the groupo mixto moved quickly to table a question in the Spanish Parliament yesterday. He asks for confirmation of the claims that Sr Margallo intervened to stop the conference and if this was coercion on the sponsors or threat of reprisals. He asked what action the minister had taken on this matter and also if the Spanish Government “considers prejudicial that the Chief Minister of Gibraltar puts forward his view at a conference in Madrid?”

Gibraltar Chronicle - The Independent Daily First Published 1801

Isn't democracy great ?

I understand that Atún Encebollado was to be served at the meal following the speech

Last edited by Fredbargate; Jan 23rd 2015 at 8:25 pm.
 
Old Jan 23rd 2015 | 10:56 pm
  #2365  
Fredbargate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,759
From: Land of no recession
Fredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas is an inter-governmental fishery organization responsible for the conservation of tunas and tuna-like species in the Atlantic Ocean and its adjacent seas.

ICCAT Membership

The Commission may be joined by:

Any government that is a member of the United Nations (UN)
Any government that is a member of a Specialized Agency of the United Nations

Gibraltar is not a member of the United Nations.

Why not???

Spain keeps blackballing us.

I rest my case
 
Old Jan 24th 2015 | 12:36 am
  #2366  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,548
la mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
I take it that you have not read the post by la mancha with the statement from a minister from GiB confirming the catch of tuna.

Maybe it is difficult for you to grasp the concept of a country or person having principles.
At least we know now that Gibs claims to be environmentally conscious are just a matter of convenience or rather inconvenience when it disturbs the neighbours.
I thought I was finished with this but as my name has just been mention I may as well answer.

If you read into my post correctly, you will see that Dr John Cortes, Gib Minister for the Environment, said that the 10 tonnes limit that was introduced is lower than the tuna being caught before regulation was in place (by Spanish fishermen as well, I add). I call that environmentally friendly.

Remember, ICCAT has just introduced an increase in the EU's quota for this year.

I take it you can come up with evidence that Gib is harvesting Tuna?
 
Old Jan 24th 2015 | 2:31 am
  #2367  
EMR
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724
EMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond reputeEMR has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by la mancha
I thought I was finished with this but as my name has just been mention I may as well answer.

If you read into my post correctly, you will see that Dr John Cortes, Gib Minister for the Environment, said that the 10 tonnes limit that was introduced is lower than the tuna being caught before regulation was in place (by Spanish fishermen as well, I add). I call that environmentally friendly.

Remember, ICCAT has just introduced an increase in the EU's quota for this year.

I take it you can come up with evidence that Gib is harvesting Tuna?
One endagered species caught for profit is a harvest.

I have asked the question and still not received an answer why has GiB awarded itself a quota unless it is for those involved to make a profit ?
I am one of those strange people who looks at cans to see what.how and where the contents are sourced. Who will avoid buying out of season fruit and veg that's has been flown half way around the world. That out of choice avoids factory farmed meats. Who in the last 20 years has never visited any fast food chains and also avoids or minimises any dealings with global exploiters like Amazon.Starbucks etc.
So its nothing to do with being anti GiB but being anti unnecessary exploitation of an endagered species. This just happens to be a GiB forum
 
Old Jan 24th 2015 | 3:23 am
  #2368  
jimenato's Avatar
FreeThinker
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9,702
From: the moors and levels
jimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
...why has GiB awarded itself a quota...
Try imposed a quota (which is what they've done) and then even you will see that Gib is just doing what everybody else is doing but better.
 
Old Jan 24th 2015 | 3:54 am
  #2369  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,548
la mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond reputela mancha has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
One endagered species caught for profit is a harvest.

I have asked the question and still not received an answer why has GiB awarded itself a quota unless it is for those involved to make a profit ?
I am one of those strange people who looks at cans to see what.how and where the contents are sourced. Who will avoid buying out of season fruit and veg that's has been flown half way around the world. That out of choice avoids factory farmed meats. Who in the last 20 years has never visited any fast food chains and also avoids or minimises any dealings with global exploiters like Amazon.Starbucks etc.
So its nothing to do with being anti GiB but being anti unnecessary exploitation of an endagered species. This just happens to be a GiB forum
Endangered species = increase in the EU’s quota for 2015. Does this equate?

‘One endagered species caught for profit is a harvest.’

A harvest is only if the fish are sold on (for a profit). Have you evidence that this is so?
 
Old Jan 24th 2015 | 4:35 am
  #2370  
Fredbargate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,759
From: Land of no recession
Fredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Gibraltar

Originally Posted by EMR
I have asked the question and still not received an answer
I have stated many times I will answer your question when you have the manners to answer mine.
So why are you avoiding the issue?????

Previous posts

Originally Posted by Fredbargate
I would appreciate your views on how a profit can be made from sports tuna fishing in Gibraltar
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
So can you explain the logistics of selling these tuna outside Gibraltar

Or does your expertise on all things Gibraltarian not extend that far?
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
You are doing your usual moving away from questions you are unhappy to answer and attacking from a different stance whilst asking for answers yourself.

However I will oblige you once you have satisfactorily address the points below.
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
I have stated that I will answer when you answer the questions put to you previously.

Lets keep things in chronological order it makes the posts less messy and more understandable.
Most important is for an answer that provides a workable logistical way of making a profit for tuna caught by sportsfishermen in Gibraltar.

So far you have made the following unworkable sugestion

Originally Posted by EMR
1) I responded at the time stating that I read and understood your post.
2 ) The sports fishing boat operators charge a fee to their customers and if they have got their sums right make a profit. They also get to keep the catch which they can sell on 100% profit.
3) As is done with other bluefin fisheries in the world the prepared fish is deep chilled \ frozen and is airfreighted to Japan or other mar!ets within hours of being landed. I am assuming that GiB has cold stores and daily scheduled flights to hubs like Heathrow with a number of daily flights to markets for tuna.

This is an established global market.

I have answered your questions now please answer mine. Why was a quota for one of the most valuable fish in the world created when in your own words Gibraltar does not have a fishing industry. Where will the catch end up.??

I then pointed out the error in your answer and since nothing

Originally Posted by Fredbargate
Gibraltar does not have a fishery therefore the basic infrastructure is not in place which of course you would know if you took a positive interest in Gibraltar.
So please explain the logistics.

When you have offered realistic answers I will answer your question.
So I am still waiting
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.