Nuclear Meltdown?
#121
Auntie Fa










Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,344
From: Seattle











Well yes, that article is now out of date, but I thought it would bring a bit of balance to the "nuclear is safe, nothing to worry about" posts.
We're only being told what they want us to know. Think what we know is scary? Hmmm.
We're only being told what they want us to know. Think what we know is scary? Hmmm.
#123
I guess the safety [of nuclear plants] argument is no longer spurious, superficial and sensationalist.
#124
Remember that Chernobyl style RMBK style reactors didn't/don't have an outer containment vessel around the core, which is why that was such a disaster. Thankfully, the Japanese reactors do have this feature.
S
#126
Bonus of decommissioning of all those old missiles (the ones they haven't kept). They mix the weapons stuff with the conventional to form MOX, which they then use in the reactors. Quite a lot of the fuel in use today has a percentage of MOX in it - mainly because its cheap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOX_fuel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOX_fuel
Yes, this is true - but my point is really that the volumes of weapons grade Pu in the oxide mix are not enough to risk a weapons grade nuclear explosion, nor are the circumstances within the reactor suitable for creating such an event. There would never be enough critical mass of refined weapons grade Pu in the appropriate circumstances to initiate the initial conditions required.
S
#127
They did.
The issue is the cool down time and the energy produced by nuclear decay and chemical reaction even when its stopped. That energy is supposed to be removed, otherwise its got nowhere to go and the temp rises enough to melt the fuel rods.
The issue is the cool down time and the energy produced by nuclear decay and chemical reaction even when its stopped. That energy is supposed to be removed, otherwise its got nowhere to go and the temp rises enough to melt the fuel rods.
#128
Yes, this is true - but my point is really that the volumes of weapons grade Pu in the oxide mix are not enough to risk a weapons grade nuclear explosion, nor are the circumstances within the reactor suitable for creating such an event. There would never be enough critical mass of refined weapons grade Pu in the appropriate circumstances to initiate the initial conditions required.
S
S
Hell, people seem to think getting a nuclear explosion is easy, its not.
#129
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12740843
from the BBC...
"More details on the reported blast at Fukushima's reactor 2. The explosion is feared to have damaged the reactor's pressure-suppression system, Kyodo says. It adds that "radiation tops legal limit" after the explosion"
Last edited by iamthecreaturefromuranus; Mar 14th 2011 at 11:41 am.
#130
Also why is there radioactivity escaping?
Last edited by Rambi; Mar 14th 2011 at 12:13 pm.
#131
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188

BBC now saying that containment vessel of reactor 2 may have been breached.
#134
Check this on line geiger counter out: It's in Tokyo BTW
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/geiger-counter-tokyo
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/geiger-counter-tokyo
#135
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 308
From: Kent to Central coast










Japan has asked for additional types of equipment that will help provide water and keep the reactors cool,
The United States has sent a team of experts to assist Japan at the nuclear site, including two cooling experts. U.S. officials are also "assembling a team of experts that would be dispatched in the near future
So says CNN. Why did it take so long? . I have heard it said the japanese were reluctant to accept help, ie turned down offers from IAEA to send out their nuclear experts,technical help.. I am just Joe?Joanne public,so dont claim to know alot about the ins and out's, but to me, surely the more "experts" working the problem the better
The United States has sent a team of experts to assist Japan at the nuclear site, including two cooling experts. U.S. officials are also "assembling a team of experts that would be dispatched in the near future
So says CNN. Why did it take so long? . I have heard it said the japanese were reluctant to accept help, ie turned down offers from IAEA to send out their nuclear experts,technical help.. I am just Joe?Joanne public,so dont claim to know alot about the ins and out's, but to me, surely the more "experts" working the problem the better



