![]() |
Nuclear Meltdown?
-------------
JAPAN'S quake-hit nuclear power plant Fukushima No.1, about 250km north-east of Tokyo, "may be experiencing nuclear meltdown", local media says. ------------- That'll be those new-fangled 'safe' nuclear reactors being all environmental then. :blink: |
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 9234201)
-------------
JAPAN'S quake-hit nuclear power plant Fukushima No.1, about 250km north-east of Tokyo, "may be experiencing nuclear meltdown", local media says. ------------- That'll be those new-fangled 'safe' nuclear reactors being all environmental then. :blink: |
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 9234203)
Oh fukushima.
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 9234207)
Any idea which way the wind is blowing?
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 9234209)
Seriously, it's terrible :(
Why do I find this hard to believe? It's the same kind of authority that said that the plants were unaffected yesterday ... Aside for the immediate damage from the quake/tsunami which is bad enough, man has to invent new ways of compounding the problem. My sympathies to all involved obviously but this nuclear thing is beyond madness. |
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 9234213)
Damn straight it is ... the authorities reckon that if it does happen then it won't affect any humans outside a 10km radius.
Why do I find this hard to believe? It's the same kind of authority that said that the plants were unaffected yesterday ... Aside for the immediate damage from the quake/tsunami which is bad enough, man has to invent new ways of compounding the problem. My sympathies to all involved obviously but this nuclear thing is beyond madness. |
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
It's ok, they're only releasing "slightly radioactive" vapour.
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by Seasider
(Post 9234241)
It's ok, they're only releasing "slightly radioactive" vapour.
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Indeed.
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by Seasider
(Post 9234253)
That article is pants - this might happen, then that may happen, then it'll be three mile island. Another example of great journalism. |
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Do you not think we need to consider the "ifs"?
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
Originally Posted by Seasider
(Post 9234261)
Do you not think we need to consider the "ifs"?
right now it just looks like its a planned for event type failure and they're dealing with it as per the process. |
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
I hope you are correct.
|
Re: Nuclear Meltdown?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:19 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.