New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
#421
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 52
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
now, sysadmin feels superior.
Last edited by vsnb; Oct 10th 2009 at 8:25 pm.
#422
BE Enthusiast
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 303
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
still they have a moral obligation to introduce the changes causing minimum shock to the applicants. How can you justify holding the visa of someone who was about to get it. each one will have different sad stories to say about it. I would call this a breach of human rights.
Oz govt. does have a moral obligations. However, oz govt won't be the first or last govt that has not fulfill these obligations.
If the oz govt has violated the human right convention then perhaps one can complain to an appropriate international body.
Last edited by INDOAUS; Oct 10th 2009 at 9:54 pm.
#423
BE Enthusiast
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 303
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
I think one example of human right is "equality before the law" which OP construes as all visa applicants should not be segregated into separate priority category.
#424
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,815
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
I am moving this thread to the Barbie as it has become a general discussion and is no longer really helping anyone looking for miration information.
In addition, if there are any more posts using abusive language, and insulting people, it will be closed.
In addition, if there are any more posts using abusive language, and insulting people, it will be closed.
#425
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
i disagree with you. Recession has been on for last one year. DIAC used to make changes in the immi rule based on how it betters or worsens. still they have a moral obligation to introduce the changes causing minimum shock to the applicants.
How can you justify holding the visa of someone who was about to get it. each one will have different sad stories to say about it. I would call this a breach of human rights.
How can you justify holding the visa of someone who was about to get it. each one will have different sad stories to say about it. I would call this a breach of human rights.
We don't have a human right to an Australiav visa, so it can't be a breach of rights.
But I do think it is immoral for DIAC to hold onto visa applicant fees for years on end without doing any work. And I don't care that we knew it was non-refundable, it is immoral and no other organisation I can think of would get away with it.
But I do think it is immoral for DIAC to hold onto visa applicant fees for years on end without doing any work. And I don't care that we knew it was non-refundable, it is immoral and no other organisation I can think of would get away with it.
It's interesting to see that the complaints about a country's immigration department are the same the world 'round.
I understand that it is *disappointing* when the rules change, or numbers become limited or things take longer than you think they should but I don't see how it's a breach of human rights.
Maybe I've just got a skewed perspective on it, but it doesn't seem unusual to me at all that some applications take years. We've got folks who are waiting in a 10 or 15 year long queue; they're happy to have their chance at it.
#426
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
its like calling the optus customer help line
#429
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 272
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
http://www.smh.com.au/national/hard-...1010-grk5.html
if this link is anything to go by it may be looking up for some.!!! well hairdresser, chefs, IT.
Let me know what you think of this article?
if this link is anything to go by it may be looking up for some.!!! well hairdresser, chefs, IT.
Let me know what you think of this article?
#430
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
http://www.smh.com.au/national/hard-...1010-grk5.html
if this link is anything to go by it may be looking up for some.!!! well hairdresser, chefs, IT.
Let me know what you think of this article?
if this link is anything to go by it may be looking up for some.!!! well hairdresser, chefs, IT.
Let me know what you think of this article?
Similarly, majority of foreign students are graduating in hair dressing and cookery, how come these trades will have any worker shortage when that bulk passes out.
Such articles don't hold any ground and drift us away from the reality.
#431
Banned
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: I refuse to answer on the grounds it may incriminate me
Posts: 4,513
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
Whats this place, a dumping ground for Immigration filth ?
#432
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
Hello and welcome to the Barbie. The English language is compulsory in this forum though we are getting more use to Indlish.
#433
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 52
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
listen to sahib, dudes
#434
Banned
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: I refuse to answer on the grounds it may incriminate me
Posts: 4,513
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
Hey Dottie, put my post back coz I'm going mad trying to remember what I said
#435
Just Joined
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Posts: 8
Re: New Processing Priorities for GSM and Business Visas - Effective 23 September
Looks like it makes no sense for me to migrate there - 4 years at least, but you have to add time for obtaining of NAATI qualification, preparation of other docs, so it makes up about 4,5 years. And again there's no guarantee against some other changes - and the worse of them, I don't know, but maybe it's possible too - that my speciality is simply cancelled from all lists as it's obvious that it's not really required at the job market there
I guess I have to look for some other ways.
I guess I have to look for some other ways.