Margaret Thatcher is dead
#348
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348











You see, this is where it all falls apart. People wanting to blame someone else for their own inadequacies and failures. its been a long long time since Thatcher was in power, many PM's have come and gone, Blair did an amazing job at ****ing UK, but yet its "cool" to hate Thatcher. I don't blame her for the way Kids are these days, I blame their lazy, ignorant parents. From the ones who don't give a crap and let their kids wander the streets at all hours from a very young age, to the ones who have this Ahh bless him, no don't tell him off he didn't mean to hurt you, he was just playing mentality. kids that grow into adults with a skewed sense of entitlement. I see it every day. . Anyone who sits back and blames all the woes of the world , and the end result of p*** poor parenting, on 1 person needs to grow up and stop being so stupid
It's called personal responsibility - the lack of which produces the dysfunctional offspring that Rajj is suggesting are Thatchers children. I bet they vote Labour
#349
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188

Her rule went a long way in wrecking Manchester, my home city, for a generation... but I still wouldn't dance on her grave. What the Hell ever happened to common decency?
#351
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348











There were bigger cold war fish to fry at that time and toppling apartheid in favour of a soviet-sponsored organisation, would have given control of the strategic Cape of Good Hope sea route to the Soviet Union. Plus risking triggering off white flight in a country that had well over a million people entitled to live and work in the UK and at a time when Britain was still struggling to pull itself up by it's bootstraps would have been unwise. Note how as soon as the cold war ended, efforts immediately were set into motion to peacefully resolve South Africa's problems.
Last edited by paulry; Apr 13th 2013 at 10:32 am.
#352









Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555

http://m.guardian.co.uk/commentisfre...doxical-legacy
A suprisingly balanced opinion piece from the Guardian. It articulates the need for industry to change but the failure to provide an alternative gave way to welfare dependence.
A suprisingly balanced opinion piece from the Guardian. It articulates the need for industry to change but the failure to provide an alternative gave way to welfare dependence.
#353
I guess that's a matter of opinion. So I'll adjust my original post to "in my opinion, the celebrations of her death have done the UK no favours at all"
Her rule went a long way in wrecking Manchester, my home city, for a generation... but I still wouldn't dance on her grave. What the Hell ever happened to common decency?
Her rule went a long way in wrecking Manchester, my home city, for a generation... but I still wouldn't dance on her grave. What the Hell ever happened to common decency?
Charles Moore put it very well a couple of days ago: there is an unwritten code of decency that one doesn't speak ill of the (recently) dead for respect of the friends and family.
Heath, Blair, Brown: they all took the UK to places I despaired of. They probably did what they did believing they were doing things in the best interests of the country, I think their policies were totally mistaken but I would never write the things I have seen in the news and on this forum in the immediate aftermath of their deaths.
Quite apart from the lack of common decency, many people are making the all too common mistake of comparing what actually happened after 1979 with what, in an ideal world with a following wind, MIGHT have happened if MT had been defeated. They forget, or didn't experience, just how low the UK had gone. The Scanlons, Jones, Hattons and the like, the 3 day week, the prolonged electricity cuts, the £50 foreign travel allowance (not a lot even then!) and so on. The Chancellor having to cancel a flight at Heathrow to plead with the IMF. Another ten years of Wilson, Callaghan, Heath, and the UK would have been a complete basket case.
.
#354
a) you don't do this for someone the tories would like to whitewash as a shining light (they are certainly not being restrained in their praise of her, given how hated she is - imagine what a silent public would result in).
b) her family are as bad, or worse. Their feelings can afford to get hurt - I'd guess they have very thick hides (as well as heads)
c) she shed no tears for the families who's lives she ruined on an ideology, without a thought for building rather than destruction.
I'm actually of the opinion that she could have rescued her 'legacy' by apologising for her crass, destructive, actions. People are generally more warm hearted than her, and would have put those crimes aside. She never did.
#356
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 457











I don't blame her for the way Kids are these days, I blame their lazy, ignorant parents. From the ones who don't give a crap and let their kids wander the streets at all hours from a very young age, to the ones who have this Ahh bless him, no don't tell him off he didn't mean to hurt you, he was just playing mentality. kids that grow into adults with a skewed sense of entitlement. I see it every day. . Anyone who sits back and blames all the woes of the world , and the end result of p*** poor parenting, on 1 person needs to grow up and stop being so stupid
The irony of it, BLAMING (in your words) the parents!!!
Blaming just one person is perhaps simplistic....a bit like Adolf was not responsible ALONE and should not take responsibility for the extremists in Rostock as it was 60years ago (FFS you cannot be serious!!). In the context of the article its not stupid at all - you reject it fine, but its not stupid.
#357
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 457











I bet they dont vote Labour....BNP, UKIP, Tories & then Labour in that order (It used to be Labour before thatcher came on the scene granted!).
#358
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 457











As others have pointed out:
b) her family are as bad, or worse. Their feelings can afford to get hurt - I'd guess they have very thick hides (as well as heads)
c) she shed no tears for the families who's lives she ruined on an ideology, without a thought for building rather than destruction.
I'm actually of the opinion that she could have rescued her 'legacy' by apologising for her crass, destructive, actions. People are generally more warm hearted than her, and would have put those crimes aside. She never did.
b) her family are as bad, or worse. Their feelings can afford to get hurt - I'd guess they have very thick hides (as well as heads)
c) she shed no tears for the families who's lives she ruined on an ideology, without a thought for building rather than destruction.
I'm actually of the opinion that she could have rescued her 'legacy' by apologising for her crass, destructive, actions. People are generally more warm hearted than her, and would have put those crimes aside. She never did.
#360
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 457











As others have pointed out:
a) you don't do this for someone the tories would like to whitewash as a shining light (they are certainly not being restrained in their praise of her, given how hated she is - imagine what a silent public would result in).
b) her family are as bad, or worse. Their feelings can afford to get hurt - I'd guess they have very thick hides (as well as heads)
c) she shed no tears for the families who's lives she ruined on an ideology, without a thought for building rather than destruction.
I'm actually of the opinion that she could have rescued her 'legacy' by apologising for her crass, destructive, actions. People are generally more warm hearted than her, and would have put those crimes aside. She never did.
a) you don't do this for someone the tories would like to whitewash as a shining light (they are certainly not being restrained in their praise of her, given how hated she is - imagine what a silent public would result in).
b) her family are as bad, or worse. Their feelings can afford to get hurt - I'd guess they have very thick hides (as well as heads)
c) she shed no tears for the families who's lives she ruined on an ideology, without a thought for building rather than destruction.
I'm actually of the opinion that she could have rescued her 'legacy' by apologising for her crass, destructive, actions. People are generally more warm hearted than her, and would have put those crimes aside. She never did.
Last edited by rajj; Apr 13th 2013 at 10:37 pm.



