Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia > The Barbie
Reload this Page >

The first mistake in the bible!

The first mistake in the bible!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:22 am
  #76  
Ex BE ***** Addict
Thread Starter
 
arkon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,770
arkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by polo
The bible in my opinion was created as a highway code of life. To put "the fear of god " into people.

I was once at a funeral where the minister was explaining why the elderly gentleman who was a great believer had suffered such a traumatic and horrendous end to his life over a 3 year period and that god had wanted him to suffer as god did at the cross.

Thats ok then.......WTF
So true. A true god would not want you to suffer just because he did. As the fanatics tell us, God is the father and creator, what decent farther want's pain and suffering for his children just because he stubbed a toe once or twisted his back whilst planting the apple tree in Eden. It's just an excuse they give because if there really was a god, then there would be no pain and suffering, mankind wouldn't be bad to each other either as that's clearly a design flaw. If HE created us with such a fundamental flaw then he made a mistake and God's don't make mistakes do they.
arkon is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:24 am
  #77  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Back home :)
Posts: 1,706
birdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by arkon
LOL. And there was me thinking, you thought the first mistake in the bible was the fisrt letter written. Welcome to the site and the debate.


You got the rid of the flu yet Arkon
birdynumnum is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:27 am
  #78  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Back home :)
Posts: 1,706
birdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by arkon
So true. A true god would not want you to suffer just because he did. As the fanatics tell us, God is the father and creator, what decent farther want's pain and suffering for his children just because he stubbed a toe once or twisted his back whilst planting the apple tree in Eden. It's just an excuse they give because if there really was a god, then there would be no pain and suffering, mankind wouldn't be bad to each other either as that's clearly a design flaw. If HE created us with such a fundamental flaw then he made a mistake and God's don't make mistakes do they.
Amen brother
birdynumnum is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:28 am
  #79  
Ex BE ***** Addict
Thread Starter
 
arkon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,770
arkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by northerner
Not really, just someone who DOES have a mind of their own to think and not believe something to be catagorically true because someone in a white coat told me so.

You state that scientist have 'proven' we came from goo, and that there's no proof whatsoever that the Bible is anything other than a fairytale. Well I haven't seen any proof - just a bunch of scientists who refuse to believe that there could be any other possibility than us all evolving from goo. And by the way - I'll repeat - 'where did the goo come from?' Where did the chemicals come from that sparked a reaction?



If you have a sane and rational mind, with no insecurities how can you possibly believe we all came from goo?
I'm not going to harp on about the AD/BC thing - but it's not just a date in time where someone decided to call it year zero. It marks the time when a guy called Jesus was on this earth (BC - Before Christ / AD - Anno Dominai, Year of our Lord) and was killed. People of the time obviously thought it an important enough event to base time on the event. Read into that what you will.

Anyway, I'm off.

Graham
Man you have got to be winding me up. Where did all the elements come from? The sun, a nuclear furnace churning them out by the bucket load. Fired into space and left to coalesce into planets. from whence the goo came maybe.

I'm sure if I was born 2000 years ago and caused a ruckus then we might now be measuring the years as AA. History and the calander was written by the victors and the Christians were the victors and so saw fit to set time zero on their fairy tale hero.
arkon is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:29 am
  #80  
Ex BE ***** Addict
Thread Starter
 
arkon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,770
arkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by birdynumnum


You got the rid of the flu yet Arkon
No, tail end now. Sore throat and bad cough. Fever has gone though so bonza, must have been all that praying I've been doing.
arkon is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:35 am
  #81  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Back home :)
Posts: 1,706
birdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond reputebirdynumnum has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by arkon
No, tail end now. Sore throat and bad cough. Fever has gone though so bonza, must have been all that praying I've been doing.
Ripper mate, you'll be able to crack a tinnie again soon

PS Try n get a copy of Cooking with Fernet Branca by James Hamilton Patterson (its not a cookery book). Reckon you'll like, its funny, very dry and'll make a change from the big book
birdynumnum is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:36 am
  #82  
Wol
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Wol's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,397
Wol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond reputeWol has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

>> This isn't aimed at you JTL, but isn't it interesting how much time and money many people (who publicly call people idiots who even half believe in there being a creator) waste on buying books and reading up on the issue?! <<

I wouldn't call it a "waste". If one does, then presumably buying a bible or koran is the same?

>> It really interests and fascinates people. <<

The origin of everything is probably the most interesting question ever posed - of course it fascinates many people.

>> Various people state with absolute conviction that it's all rubbish and anyone who believes it is a freak - there's absolutely no evidence etc.,, etc... <<

Sensible people don't entirely rule out some sort of "creator" - but extraordinary claims demand extraordinary eveidence to be acceptable. To me there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever for a god.

The pink teapot theory - whimsical, yes, but valid in this context - can be invoked. If i state that there's an intelligent pink teapot orbiting the sun and that communicates with me by thought waves, you cannot disprove it. I may be completely convinced myself, but it is not proveable or unproveable. If I write it all down and a few hundred people also are convinced - with no evidence - then in a few hundred years it might be a respectable religion. There have been many equally bizarre cults taking in millions of people.

>> Well here's a simple, non inflamatory question - why are we in the year 2007AD? AD being Anno Domini. Surely that must mean something? <<

Various societies have different dating systems, usually based on religious anniversaries - which would you accept??

>> Also, as a passing comment, I personally find it far more unbelievable that we all evolved from some cosmic goo - this is what the most (apparently) intelligent scientists would have us believe!!!! WTF?! Are you for real? Ooooh yeah, a bit of goo (oh, by the way - how did the goo get there?) that developed into what we see in 2007. Oh yeah - I buy that LOL <<

Inventing a supernatural entity doesn't explain anything at all - it just pushes the question further back. If the believer asks "But what came before the big bang, or did time stretch back infinitely?" I think one's entitled to ask "So what made god, or came before him?" An answer to one is the answer to both.

>> Sorry, this is long winded. But what annoys me is people who catagorically say it's crap and it's 'obvious' that we just happened to be and quote some book written by a scientist as 'proof'. What crap.

Graham <<

Absolutely - what ****. But no-one is saying that. A classic Straw Man argument.
Wol is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 3:56 am
  #83  
Australia's Doorman
 
Hutch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: The Shoalhaven, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 11,056
Hutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Damn those scientists and their scientific ways. Damn electricity, damn medicines, damn doctors too while we're at it. Freaks in white coats mumbling hocus-pocus about 'elements' and 'atoms'. Damn all those odd-balls in white tunics, like Aristotle, who lived before the sandal wearer from Nazareth and introduced such bizarre freaky concepts as biology and medicine, instead of doing parlour tricks. Burn them all and burn their heathen books too.

I am the way, the truth and the shite.
Hutch is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:01 am
  #84  
Ex BE ***** Addict
Thread Starter
 
arkon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,770
arkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by Hutch
Damn those scientists and their scientific ways. Damn electricity, damn medicines, damn doctors too while we're at it. Freaks in white coats mumbling hocus-pocus about 'elements' and 'atoms'. Damn all those odd-balls in white tunics, like Aristotle, who lived before the sandal wearer from Nazareth and introduced such bizarre freaky concepts as biology and medicine, instead of doing parlour tricks. Burn them all and burn their heathen books too.

I am the way, the truth and the shite.
No, The big J wins against Harris Tottle any day, He made wine out of water FFS. I mean just what kind of science can do that?
arkon is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:07 am
  #85  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,455
Sally is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by northerner

Anyway, I'm off.

Graham
Thank god for that.
Sally is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:15 am
  #86  
BE Forum Addict
 
esperanza's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: 'stralia
Posts: 2,383
esperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by northerner

I'm not going to harp on about the AD/BC thing - but it's not just a date in time where someone decided to call it year zero. It marks the time when a guy called Jesus was on this earth (BC - Before Christ / AD - Anno Dominai, Year of our Lord) and was killed. People of the time obviously thought it an important enough event to base time on the event.
Well, some people did. Not everyone. Plenty of people today don't consider us to be in the year 2007.
And most of the people who do use the date 2007 probably do not believe that it marks 2007 years since the son of God walked the earth.
esperanza is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:39 am
  #87  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,533
TraceyW is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by northerner

I'm not going to harp on about the AD/BC thing - but it's not just a date in time where someone decided to call it year zero. It marks the time when a guy called Jesus was on this earth (BC - Before Christ / AD - Anno Dominai, Year of our Lord) and was killed. People of the time obviously thought it an important enough event to base time on the event. Read into that what you will.


Graham
I have to say, in fear of getting stoned and whipped, but I agree with this point here. If nothing important happened at that time, why was the event marked in such a significant way?

I also agree with the other posters who say that the majority of the Bible is a load of old tosh, but....I do believe there was a preacher called Jesus. I don't know what he did, I seriously doubt he performed miracles and the like, and I absolutely don't believe his mother was a virgin, but I do like to believe he tried to encourage other human beings to be better people. I like to think that was a good thing.
TraceyW is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:40 am
  #88  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,455
Sally is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by TraceyW
I have to say, in fear of getting stoned and whipped, but I agree with this point here. If nothing important happened at that time, why was the event marked in such a significant way?

I also agree with the other posters who say that the majority of the Bible is a load of old tosh, but....I do believe there was a preacher called Jesus. I don't know what he did, I seriously doubt he performed miracles and the like, and I absolutely don't believe his mother was a virgin, but I do like to believe he tried to encourage other human beings to be better people. I like to think that was a good thing.
Having AD proves the bible is right?

Now I've heard everything.
Sally is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:41 am
  #89  
Suncream, I need suncream
 
northerner's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,316
northerner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by Sally
Thank god for that.
Thanks Sally. Carry on 'Thinking less, breathing more' - that's a great philosophy. Just trying to play devils advocate ('scuse the pun).

Sorry if I've offended anyone for having a slightly different opinion to the masses. It's also interesting to note that whilst people here say they can't stand God botherers because they alway think they're right and you can't win an arguement with them no matter what you say - well what is everyone doing on this thread?? Exactly that I'd suggest - 'we're right, you're wrong, you're stupid for thinking any differently to us'. Brilliant.

Graham

PS For the record I'm not a practising Christian or anything else.
northerner is offline  
Old Jun 23rd 2007, 4:43 am
  #90  
Suncream, I need suncream
 
northerner's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,316
northerner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by Sally
Having AD proves the bible is right?

Now I've heard everything.
That's not what she said at all.
northerner is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.