2016 Election
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,009
Re: 2016 Election
Yes, lots of people.
Aha! Now you get to the root of the matter. "wealthy".
Mere mortals probably pay more tax than they need to, but cannot afford to pay experts to research the appropriate tax reduction mechanisms.
Just because not paying more taxes than you need to sounds a basic, sensible approach to life, doesn't mean that everyone is in that situation. With some professional help I could probably reduce my tax bill for this year, but would I reduce it enough to pay for that help? The richer you are, the more your statement applies.
Aha! Now you get to the root of the matter. "wealthy".
Mere mortals probably pay more tax than they need to, but cannot afford to pay experts to research the appropriate tax reduction mechanisms.
Just because not paying more taxes than you need to sounds a basic, sensible approach to life, doesn't mean that everyone is in that situation. With some professional help I could probably reduce my tax bill for this year, but would I reduce it enough to pay for that help? The richer you are, the more your statement applies.
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,009
Re: 2016 Election
Tax evasion another matter, is there any evidence that Trump has engaged in tax evasion ?
I am still curious- do you voluntarily pay more taxes than you need to by not taking a tax credit or deduction ?
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,009
Re: 2016 Election
Further to that, wealthy people also make "donations" to politicians so that they get favourable tax reductions mechanisms in the first place. Again something mere mortals can't do.
So the controversy isn't that Trump can structure his finances to pay such a small amount of tax. It's that the system is setup to allow him to do so.
So the controversy isn't that Trump can structure his finances to pay such a small amount of tax. It's that the system is setup to allow him to do so.
Though I find it amusing Trump willingly admits to making donations to gain favors, then criticizes others for "pay to play..
Re: 2016 Election
"not paying more than you need to" =/= paying $0
Re: 2016 Election
I think a big difference between Buffet and Trump is that the latter cannot bear to lose. I think it would keep him up at night if he thought he had paid 1c more tax than he needed to, and he would be almost obsessive about getting it back - whatever the cost of doing so! That's a general trait that I do not think would be good to have leading the country.
Re: 2016 Election
This is quite an amusing trip down memory lane. http://http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/10/the-insane-things-youveforgotten-about-trumps-campaign.html
Re: 2016 Election
Exclusive: The Democratic National Committee Has Told the FBI It Found Evidence Its HQ Was Bugged | Mother Jones
something something Watergate
something something Watergate
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,009
Re: 2016 Election
So what should he pay ?
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
Re: 2016 Election
So what should he pay ?
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
I'm not a tax lawyer so I can't say if his actions are legal or just beyond legal. Lots of the commentary I've read suggests he has gone beyond the spirit of the law if not the letter. If a supposed billionaire is paying $0 taxes that's more than just exploiting legal loopholes.
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: 2016 Election
So what should he pay ?
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
Anyway, to me it's the bigger picture that counts. His tax plan would cut taxes for the "rich" significantly and leave us with a gaping budget deficit again. Why should we trust on taxes someone who seems not to pay any income taxes and whose tax plan favours the segment of the population he claims to be a member of?
Last edited by Giantaxe; Nov 4th 2016 at 11:24 pm.
Return of bouncing girl!
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: The Fourth Reich
Posts: 4,931
Re: 2016 Election
So what should he pay ?
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
If you had a choice of paying $0 taxes for whatever reason, would you instead pay $2,000 because you thought it was unfair to pay -0- taxes?
Trump has a lot of negatives one can point out or debate, but let's be serious who would pay taxes if they knew they didn't need to ?
The shame is on Democrat and Republican lawmakers who permit all this.
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,009
Re: 2016 Election
It's called a social contract, you pay your fair share. Trump is going beyond minimizing his taxes by say making more charitable contributions (which apparently no one has found any evidence that he personally has made any of, his foundation apparently makes contributions using other people's money), he is going beyond paying himself a modest salary that is fair and reasonable for the position, etc...
I'm not a tax lawyer so I can't say if his actions are legal or just beyond legal. Lots of the commentary I've read suggests he has gone beyond the spirit of the law if not the letter. If a supposed billionaire is paying $0 taxes that's more than just exploiting legal loopholes.
I'm not a tax lawyer so I can't say if his actions are legal or just beyond legal. Lots of the commentary I've read suggests he has gone beyond the spirit of the law if not the letter. If a supposed billionaire is paying $0 taxes that's more than just exploiting legal loopholes.
I do know wealthy people who have years they pay no taxes especially if they are involved in real estate, so that doesn't completely surprise me.
I am not a tax lawyer either though I have dealt with a lot of tax structuring issues involving businesses. I do agree with you that based on the commentary out there, and his own attitude, I wouldn't be surprised if he pushes the envelope on his deductions and how he runs his foundation. Having a foundation buy a huge portrait of himself as was reported does seems like a potential red flag to me.
While there seems like there are various issues involving the Clinton foundation that one might wonder about, at least the Clinton foundation did do a lot of good work.