2016 Election
Is it too soon for a presidential election thread?
Ted Cruz is a good stalking horse though, lots of people like him for some reason. Scares me a little. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11600350)
..... Ted Cruz is a good stalking horse though, lots of people like him for some reason. .......
In that respect, both Reagan and Clinton were much more effective presidents than presidents Bush II and Obama. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11600363)
He seems confused about what powers the US president has, ..... like most other candidates from both parties in the recent presidential elections. As the last two presidents have discovered, without the support of congress not much gets done, and what does get done, is flawed.
In that respect, both Reagan and Clinton were much more effective presidents than presidents Bush II and Obama. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11600376)
Seems to be lost on a lot of people these days that congress and the president need to work together, if they don't we get the dysfunction we see all too often.
|
Re: 2016 Election
The same fuss won't be made over Cruz's alleged birthplace as it was over Obama's.
None of the less extreme Republicans have officially entered the race yet. This will be very different race to the last one, which they never stood a chance of winning. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11600376)
Seems to be lost on a lot of people these days that congress and the president need to work together, if they don't we get the dysfunction we see all too often.
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 11600384)
A lot of those people seemed to be in the White House or Congress. :(
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 11600395)
The same fuss won't be made over Cruz's alleged birthplace as it was over Obama's.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11600363)
He seems confused about what powers the US president has, ..... like most other candidates from both parties in the recent presidential elections. As the last two presidents have discovered, without the support of congress not much gets done, and what does get done, is flawed.
In that respect, both Reagan and Clinton were much more effective presidents than presidents Bush II and Obama. However that trend seems to have changed in the republican party. On the state level where republicans have taken over the governorship and both chambers, the first laws to be passed are anti abortion, anti gay, voter suppression laws, and other laws that are desired by the far right base. It seems that the more moderate republicans fear the wrath, money and power of the far right and therefore vote for those laws. We see the same thing in the house of representatives with the minority far right driving the agenda. If someone like Cruz gets into office, I wouldn't be surprised if republicans fell in line and passed radical far right changes. |
Re: 2016 Election
Politics in any democracy suffer the same key flaw: voters too oft willingly dismiss reality in favour of appealing rhetoric: manufacturing beliefs on premises that don't actually exist (or are in reality, insignificant, or merely a side-effect instead of a root cause or issue).
In the UK at the moment, it's "tax avoidance" that's caused the UK's "economic disaster" (neither of which are statistically true, yet are widely held views amongst voters). In film production (and marketing/advertising), one key (and widely employed) method of inducing mass "belief" is referred to as "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief". |
Re: 2016 Election
Tee Hee
Ha Ha Ho Ho::cool: Someone's Trolling the Hell Out of Ted Cruz With TedCruz.com ... best buckle up The bumpy ride has just begun...... :popcorn: |
Re: 2016 Election
Will she...won't she...?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11600399)
It is funny to see the mental contortions they go through to say how obviously Cruz is clearly USC because of his mother while simultaneously trying to continue to dismiss Obama's claim of actually being born in the US.
|
Re: 2016 Election
When I saw the thread title, I assumed it was the UK election, especially after the Ask The Chancellors event this morning. As I'm unable to vote yet, and it'll probably be between a Clinton and a Bush, can't say I care right at this time.
|
Re: 2016 Election
I don't even think he can win the nomination, but who knows.....
Maybe someone better will throw in their hat. If its down to Cruz or Clinton, won't even bother voting, I don't want either of them. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11600539)
I don't even think he can win the nomination, but who knows.....
Maybe someone better will throw in their hat. If its down to Cruz or Clinton, won't even bother voting, I don't want either of them. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 7:34 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.