British Expats - 2016 Election

I did the quiz out of interest . I did not check the public opinion data for each question but simply answered each question according to my opinions and thoughts . Those thoughts and opinions have little to do with the USA as I don't live/vote there & much more to do with my view of our present day world globally.

I came out equal 89% Clinton and Stein.

SultanOfSwing

Aug 17th 2016 4:49 pm

Re: 2016 Election

Quote:

Originally Posted by anotherlimey (Post 12029149)

Mine says 65% Jill Stein. Who the hell is she?! Lol

Green Party. Quite anti-science though, a medical doctor who has appeared to be anti-vaccination.

Why, then, did I get 84% Jill Stein when the last time I did this test I was 90+% Clinton :confused:

scrubbedexpat091

Aug 17th 2016 8:26 pm

Re: 2016 Election

80% Jill Stein

77% Clinton

44% Gary Johnson

35% Castle

23% Trump

amideislas

Aug 17th 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2016 Election

This is precious - From Michael Moore (thanks to ingles for this).

Trump Is Self-Sabotaging His Campaign Because He Never Really Wanted The Job In The First Place

Quote:

Donald Trump never actually wanted to be president of the United States. I know this for a fact. Iâ€™m not going to say how I know it. Iâ€™m not saying that Trump and I shared the same agent or lawyer or stylist or, if we did, that that would have anything to do with anything. And Iâ€™m certainly not saying that I ever overheard anything at those agencies or in the hallways of NBC or anywhere else. But there are certain people reading this right now, they know who they are, and they know that every word in the following paragraphs actually happened.

moneypenny20

Aug 17th 2016 10:56 pm

Re: 2016 Election

Quote:

Originally Posted by BEVS (Post 12029168)

I got 89% Clinton, Stein 62% and the rest were in the 40s. Glad I don't live there. :lol:

Philk

Aug 18th 2016 12:45 am

Re: 2016 Election

Trump just tweeted that people will soon be calling him Mr Brexit - seems he's bought into the falsehood that the polls didn't predict Brexit

( so all his policies will not take place until many years in the future, the dollar will fall and Boris becomes his Foreign secretary?)

robin1234

Aug 18th 2016 12:57 am

Re: 2016 Election

Jill Stein, 99%.

Since I live in New York, I guess I could vote for her with no adverse consequences.

zargof

Aug 18th 2016 1:33 am

Re: 2016 Election

Quote:

Originally Posted by robin1234 (Post 12029388)

Jill Stein, 99%.

Since I live in New York, I guess I could vote for her with no adverse consequences.

98% Stein
94% Clinton.

I do wonder how they determine what Trump's positions are though; considering they change every day.

zargof

Aug 18th 2016 1:39 am

Re: 2016 Election

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 12029178)

Green Party. Quite anti-science though, a medical doctor who has appeared to be anti-vaccination.

Why, then, did I get 84% Jill Stein when the last time I did this test I was 90+% Clinton :confused:

It's a little more complex than that, more against "Big Pharma" than anti vaccine. Whether that's better or not is a different debate.

Is Green Party Candidate Jill Stein 'Anti-Vaccine'? : snopes.com

I do wonder about some of the information on that test. For example, it says that Clinton is anti fracking. Last time I checked she was pro fracking, has that changed?

Philk

Aug 18th 2016 1:56 am

Re: 2016 Election

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqJIwvrWYAEcU-J.jpg

Anian

Aug 18th 2016 2:10 am

Re: 2016 Election

Quote:

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 12029407)

98% Stein
94% Clinton.

I do wonder how they determine what Trump's positions are though; considering they change every day.

Same as mine. As for Trump, I got 2%. I thought I might get more since he has been for and against pretty much everything at some stage in the race.

All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:50 pm.