|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 11868587)
Very interesting analysis, especially the 'primary' angle.
To the brain trust - what are the chances of the Dems winning the senate in 2016? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11868588)
I suspect very low. Many Rs in the senate aren't even up for re-election this term.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11868618)
Not exactly accurate. Only 1/3 of the Senate is up for reelection at any one time. This year that includes only 10 Dems and 24 Repubs. 34 Dems and 2 Ind. That caucus with them are not up for reelection. So definitely a chance to retake the Senate.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11868624)
Ah but how many are defending slim majorities?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11868210)
Hookers for Hillary: meet the sex workers caucusing for Clinton in Nevada
Hookers for Hillary: meet the sex workers caucusing for Clinton in Nevada | US news | The Guardian |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11868631)
That just made Hillary go up in my reckoning. :thumbsup:
http://images.politico.com/global/20...batograph2.png |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11868634)
I was expecting that from some on here, but not from you.
http://images.politico.com/global/20...batograph2.png YOU BETTER ANSWER ME. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11868635)
What's that map got to do with it?:confused:
YOU BETTER ANSWER ME. Well it shows the States in play for the Senate race. I did hear that those Hookers had Bill's stamp of approval. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 11868587)
I despise so much about the man, but I can't help but applaud him for 1) Hitting Bush hard on Iraq 2) Hitting Bush hard on 9/11 3) Saying Planned Parenthood does wonderful things for women. Now that Rand Paul is gone, and Ron Paul isn't running, it's great to see Trump up there saying these things on the Republican stage. In the old days (prior elections), Ron Paul was a marginal player so tended to say his piece and get ignored, but now we have the front-runner saying these things - priceless! Hitting Jeb and W with 9/11 is, in my mind, below the belt. I have never believed, nor bought into any of the conspiracy theories regarding the matter. 9/11 wasn't W's fault any more than it was Clinton's fault. It just happened. Anyhoodles, and the reason I thought to respond specifically, Trump has been on TV doubling down on blaming Bush(s) for 9/11. :lol: |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11868644)
Err err err...
Well it shows the States in play for the Senate race. I did hear that those Hookers had Bill's stamp of approval. RE: Bill. Eeewww. Have you seen him lately? :huh: |
Re: 2016 Election
Obama should tell the GOP to go **** themselves and nominate someone to replace Scalia. A lame duck president has done that before and in fact it's happened about six times in history. It's not for the republicans to deny him that right
More than likely the GOP majority will shoot it down but it might be some payback for all the grief the racist, do nothing Congress has been handing him for 7 years |
Re: 2016 Election
He will.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Jeb Bush has brought in Dubya to help bolster his So Carolina campaign :lol:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11868687)
He will.
|
Re: 2016 Election
If nothing else the campaign is entertaining...on both sides.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:20 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.