Happy New Year mis esurianos.
My apologies, I am afraid I have so many questions:

1. Who is the President of the Costa Esuri Urbanization? It is Fadesa, isn't it?
2. Who else, along with the Mayor and the owners of individual parcelas, would have been invited to this (Fadesa's) meeting? (I am answering my own question, again.) The Presidents of each CP (Comunidad de propietarios): Las Encinas & Vista Esuri apartments & penthouses (RAGOs I & II), Marina Esuri apartments & duplexes (RMA I), Las Lomas townhouses(RVA4), and Las Jarras townhouses (RVA1?). Have I missed anybody? These are only the Fadesa sites, I believe.
3. What about the Guadiana Golf CP, Los Albatros CP, Ayad Golf CP, Sea & Sun CP, etc? Aren't they all part of the Urbanizacion, and therefore, part of the new EUC?
4. Was there any representation on their behalf? Did the meeting on the 31st December meet quorum?
5. Has a constitution for the EUC been drafted?

That'll do for now.
In case anyone should reply with the questions: "Why don't you know all the answers? You are a property owner, aren't you?" I would just like to say that I have read enough of "ajo y agua".

Carol

Hello Luz,
You are correct, the information has been available.
Since 2005 (earliest I've found) & 2008 (latest I've found):
http://www.derecho.com/l/bop-huelva/...ipal-ayamonte/
http://www.derecho.com/l/bop-huelva/...ipal-ayamonte/

Carol

P.S. The relevant pages are 7583 - 7593 from the first pdf.

Hi Carol & John

In our case I think the information should be available from our administrators.

The Mayor of Ayamonte who is a lawyer by profession and should be a very senior member of the board in any event.

An EUC which is what has just been formed is a quasi - public body that acts as the over - arching community for all of the detached villas and other communities at CE. The authorisation of the Town Hall is required to form the entity that is the EUC. The regulations allow private persons to share administration of the services with the municipal authority.

It seems to me that the Mayor has a right to be on the board and why not make him President since he represents the single most powerful voice.

Can't find any page numbers!

My apologies, John. Looks like I copied twice. Here it is:
http://www.diphuelva.es/asp/BOP/pdf/20051026-1.pdf
Pages are numbered on the top of the page.
Can you open the file? If not, google search using: estatutos entidad urbanistica conservacion esuri fadesa. This pdf is the third on the list. The other link (derecho) is the 7th on the list. This is a modification of the earlier one (26 Oct. 2005).
Carol

I get the point when you say the Mayor has been elected onto the board for the EUC. However, my question remains, who is/was the President of the CE Urb. prior to the formation of the EUC?

Found it. I always expected the EUC to be formed since the Law says it must be but I worry about the undue haste which seemed to have happened just before Christmas and immediately following the announcement by the supervising Judge that Fadesa was solvent and could trade out of Administration.

Fadesa must still own over 1000 properties and a large number of plots so they will have a huge ongoing commitment to pay their share of the EUC costs. Is this €6m that they have put forward in lieu of further payments or is it as it should be to bring the infrastructure up to scratch before adoption by the Ayuntamiento with the normal annual payments to follow. Will the EUC be registered as a creditor to make sure that the payments are made?

Until the formation of the EUC there was no over - arching body to be President of.

Thanks for that info I have been taking a look at the website every now and then and as recent as Wednesday nothing had changed. Just had a looksee and there it is the best info yet on what is going on.

No the €6m is not underhand it is a bond against completion of the infrastructure to the agreed layout and standard. See: -

http://www.theoraclenews.com/index.p...=186&Itemid=26

Ned I could not agree more we should all stand together at Esuri. Things are bad in general and in CE so we must do all we can to improve the situation.

The formation of the EUC was required by Law and Carol has demonstrated that it was first mooted in 2005 so it should not have surprised us that it is taking place now but it did surprise me.

What we must do is ensure that the Board and its members are truly representing the views of the majority of owners and working to improve the situation at the lowest cost.

i agree that if it is a requirement by law then so be it but the problem i see is that i am now paying in to a communnity an inter community a council tax and now this euc on a 2 bedroom house that i am only there maximum 6 weeks per year and i feel many other owners are in the same boat could it not benefit us all if the whole urb came under 1 umbrella and 1 monthly payment instead of all these splinter groups

Read post 4696, I think you are confusing things a bit.
Villa owners pay for everything themselves, ie comunity charge and upkeep of the villa, if you are in a bloque then the running costs, ie pool gardens etc are shared, you are not paying twice.

believe me i pay 1 adminastration company for the community and a differant admin company for the inter community and then i have a yearly council tax bill so with this new euc charge that is 4 differant charges