![]() |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10966453)
I agree, and to my mind it is not compatible to defend womens rights and defend Islam in the same breath.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10966453)
I agree, and to my mind it is not compatible to defend womens rights and defend Islam in the same breath.
Those that do are not being honest with themselves or others. And there is no place for such discrimination of women in the UK. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967776)
Women priests are forbidden in Orthodox Christianity.... I expect that's fine though because it's Christian not Muslim.....
To compare the terrible way women are treated under islam with that is just pathetic, and you know if. I am talking about the things that are really important to most women, ie the welfare of their children. To compare the prospect of losing custody of their children is a more pressing worry for women under sharia law, than not being allowed to be a priest is for non muslim women. What´s with you that makes you come out with totally stupid reasoning whenever something negative is said about islam. Are you muslim? I am wondering because you seem defend the religion at every turn, an throw in ludicrous comments, but don´t seem to care about the rights of women in your own country the UK. I can´t think of any other reason why someone would defend the abuse of womens rights, unless islam is very important to them. And while I don´t have strong feelings either way about women priesta, I still feel that islamic sharia law has no place in the UK. The custody laws, inheritance laws are unfair to women, and against uk law. Women are coersed into going to sharia courts, a lot of them don´t know their rights under UK law and are often intimidated by male relatives into seeking a judgment. |
Re: British standards ???
A Christian right wing group sent a letter bomb to Northern Irish councilors.... Not Muslim, not Radical Islamic, right wing Christian.... still, best we focus on the rag heads eh?
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967807)
Trust you to come up with a post about banning women priests, when discussing womens rights.
To compare the terrible way women are treated under islam with that is just pathetic, and you know if. I am talking about the things that are really important to most women, ie the welfare of their children. To compare the prospect of losing custody of their children is a more pressing worry for women under sharia law, than not being allowed to be a priest is for non muslim women. What´s with you that makes you come out with totally stupid reasoning whenever something negative is said about islam. Are you muslim? I am wondering because you seem defend the religion at every turn, an throw in ludicrous comments, but don´t seem to care about the rights of women in your own country the UK. I can´t think of any other reason why someone would defend the abuse of womens rights, unless islam is very important to them. And while I don´t have strong feelings either way about women priesta, I still feel that islamic sharia law has no place in the UK. The custody laws, inheritance laws are unfair to women, and against uk law. Women are coersed into going to sharia courts, a lot of them don´t know their rights under UK law and are often intimidated by male relatives into seeking a judgment. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967807)
Are you muslim?
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967821)
A Christian right wing group sent a letter bomb to Northern Irish councilors.... Not Muslim, not Radical Islamic, right wing Christian.... still, best we focus on the rag heads eh?
What has that got to do with bombing? I won´t hold my breath for an answer, I know you will run true to form, and create another smoke screen before calling for backup. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10967829)
And on it goes.
Maybe you can give me examples where women don´t come off worse under islam. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967830)
I am talking about womens rights, British women who happen to be muslim, but who are not treated in the same way as non muslims as regards their rights under UK law.
What has that got to do with bombing? I won´t hold my breath for an answer, I know you will run true to form, and create another smoke screen before calling for backup. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967834)
Right on cue.
Maybe you can give me examples where women don´t come off worse under islam. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10967829)
And on it goes.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967834)
Right on cue.
Maybe you can give me examples where women don´t come off worse under islam. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967835)
The thread is about a Free School that has over stepped the remit it was given and is being dealt with.... if you want to start a thread about how women are being downtrodden then start one....
However there is a group of women who don´t have equality. those that are under islamic law. So I think that my points are perfectly valid, as I am not discussing how muslim women are treated in Iran only in the UK. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jonboy
(Post 10967756)
You are correct, there is nothing that is compatible with anything else!
These writings appear to be written for men by men. All appear to be anti female. Stoning women appears to be some form of global past-time. Try to look beyond Islam, see the bigger picture. "They, not necessarily Islam" appear to be out to get you and your kind! Then again it is all about interpretation and how people choose to interpret what is before them. that is in the New Testament of the Bible, some 800 years before Mohammed and the start of the Muslim religion - which recognises Jesus as a Prophet. The New Testament also shows in the Acts of the Apostles that women play a key part in religion and what happened in a few short years. ~ |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967841)
Great isn't it? It's almost like an obsession....
When I raised that point before, people were saying they'd never even met a muslim, yet clearly they lie awake fretting about them. If I believed anyone on this thread was actually an activist for women's rights, I might be prepared to listen. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10967851)
I really think it is.
When I raised that point before, people were saying they'd never even met a muslim, yet clearly they lie awake fretting about them. If I believed anyone on this thread was actually an activist for women's rights, I might be prepared to listen. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967844)
The tread is about British standards, and in Britian women have equality under UK law.
However there is a group of women who don´t have equality. those that are under islamic law. So I think that my points are perfectly valid, as I am not discussing how muslim women are treated in Iran only in the UK. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967825)
Isn't it better to discuss a topic than to try and twist someone elses viewpoint and comments like some sort of rubbish internet troll? At no point have I "stood up for" an abuse of womens rights or condoned anything of the sort but you keep trying to twist my words that way... it's offensive and the work of a troll. Grow up or **** off.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967858)
So the way women are treated in Hinduism and Sikhism, how orthodox Christian women and Jewish women and how tribal women in Africa is of no consequence to you, you simply don't care... what bothers you is how the filthy dirty Muslims treat their women.... Pretty much tells me all I need to know about you to be honest.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967856)
Do you actually think I lie awake fretting about muslims?:rofl::rofl::rofl:
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967856)
Do you actually think I lie awake fretting about muslims?:rofl::rofl::rofl:
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10967861)
It's the impression I get, yes.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967862)
You do come across that way to be honest.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967866)
I won´t say what you come across as.:rofl:
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967868)
Please do... I mean, so far, the only person who has been personal is you so if you feel the need to be personal rather than discuss the subject then just go for it....
|
Re: British standards ???
See the race equality unit's alert system is working. Let them play amongst themselves, they can't operate without feeding them. Jeezuz they are better than a sleeping pill:scarper:
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967872)
So you can go whinging to the mods?????AGAIN:rofl:
... and back to the subject at hand..... Free schools..... |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967883)
Ok... firstly, don't laugh at your own jokes... Secondly... that wasn't funny... at all... and thirdly, who says I go running to anyone? Just because CERTAIN people can't control themselves and spout all sorts of empty threats and spout abuse like a hormonal teenager and then get themselves banned doesn't mean I run to the Mods... They pretty much see everything that goes on love... everything....
... and back to the subject at hand..... Free schools..... |
Re: British standards ???
:banghead::banghead:
Come on folks, lets not get personal. Thanks :) |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10967776)
Women priests are forbidden in Orthodox Christianity.... I expect that's fine though because it's Christian not Muslim.....
As the Hebrew religion is something like 3761 years older than Christianity and the Muslim religion about 600 years younger than Christianity perhaps it will be a long while before we see any major changes |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10968550)
if it is possible to have a woman Rabbi - the first was ordained in 1935 in Germany, it became a regular thing in the 1970's USA then it is possible to have women priests and imams - eventually
As the Hebrew religion is something like 3761 years older than Christianity and the Muslim religion about 600 years younger than Christianity perhaps it will be a long while before we see any major changes Some religions treat women as less than second class. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10968550)
if it is possible to have a woman Rabbi - the first was ordained in 1935 in Germany, it became a regular thing in the 1970's USA then it is possible to have women priests and imams - eventually
As the Hebrew religion is something like 3761 years older than Christianity and the Muslim religion about 600 years younger than Christianity perhaps it will be a long while before we see any major changes |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10967844)
The tread is about British standards, and in Britian women have equality under UK law.
However there is a group of women who don´t have equality. those that are under islamic law. So I think that my points are perfectly valid, as I am not discussing how muslim women are treated in Iran only in the UK. All that some people are objecting to is your sweeping generalizations about "Muslims". Clearly not all "Muslims" practice the faith to the letter and certainly only some are brutal, just as not all Christians force their wives to obey them and beat them as the Bible indicates. Equally, there is a vast amount of oppression and violence inflicted on women daily all over the world by those who claim no religion at all, so it is not a valid argument to simply draw a line around oppression afflicted by "Muslims" and then say "Muslims oppress women", and does a disservice to the rights of women as a whole. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10968625)
I am just unsure as to why it's just Islam that is being targeted by a handful of posters on here... as it always is.
|
Re: British standards ???
The thread is " Titled " British standards, NOT, what do you thnk about the scholol in question.
As such it covers a myriad of subjects. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10967847)
ISTR that Jesus said "let ye who is without fault cast the first stone" (IIRC)
that is in the New Testament of the Bible, some 800 years before Mohammed and the start of the Muslim religion - which recognises Jesus as a Prophet. The New Testament also shows in the Acts of the Apostles that women play a key part in religion and what happened in a few short years. ~ It sort of puts a damper on my theories:( Good post though:thumbup: |
Re: British standards ???
:confused: Have I been reading this correctly?
Is someone actually trying to compare the womans rights in Islam to that of Christian countries???? I would suggest it´s a theory so genious that it´s beyond the grasp of most :blink: |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by IamStu
(Post 10968933)
:confused: Have I been reading this correctly?
Is someone actually trying to compare the womans rights in Islam to that of Christian countries???? I would suggest it´s a theory so genious that it´s beyond the grasp of most :blink: |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 10968945)
That's because you are a normal person:D
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by IamStu
(Post 10968933)
:confused: Have I been reading this correctly?
Is someone actually trying to compare the womans rights in Islam to that of Christian countries???? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:54 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.