![]() |
Re: British standards ???
seems a UK taxi can't have a St George's flag stickers on doors as
would leave anyone who is not English at a 'disadvantage in their day to day life' seems there was 1 (yes - one) complaint by unspecified person http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-sticker.html |
Re: British standards ???
The problem with the flag of st George is that it has been chosen by the extreme right parties and groups and is associated in the mind of many with ignorance and rascism.
This is a real pity, the welsh have their Dragon, the Scots the Saltire, the Protestant NI the red hand of Ulster. Why don,t we English have a red Lion on a white background, there is no historical associations with the crusdades , the thicker end of the England football supporters, EDL, EDF etc. Plus all these new flags and banners would bring employment to the poorer areas of China, |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10950176)
seems a UK taxi can't have a St George's flag stickers on doors as
would leave anyone who is not English at a 'disadvantage in their day to day life' seems there was 1 (yes - one) complaint by unspecified person http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-sticker.html People who make the rules or enforce them, really need to man up. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by EMR
(Post 10950675)
The problem with the flag of st George is that it has been chosen by the extreme right parties and groups and is associated in the mind of many with ignorance and rascism.
This is a real pity, the welsh have their Dragon, the Scots the Saltire, the Protestant NI the red hand of Ulster. Why don,t we English have a red Lion on a white background, there is no historical associations with the crusdades , the thicker end of the England football supporters, EDL, EDF etc. Plus all these new flags and banners would bring employment to the poorer areas of China, Its not a pity, its a flag and its acceptable. you say I am narrow minded, well **** you, this is as narrow minded as it gets when you claim our flag has been chosen by far right groups. Its a stupid story that could be shut down by a decent brief in no time. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by EMR
(Post 10950675)
Why don,t we English have a red Lion on a white background, there is no historical associations with the crusdades , the thicker end of the England football supporters, EDL, EDF etc.
Have you never just for once thought about putting your brain into gear before banging away at the keyboard like a complete eejit ? |
Re: British standards ???
Many right-wing groups have tried to wrap themselves in assorted flags, and that includes the English flag and the Union flag.
The trick is to take it back. National symbols do not belong to them any more than the country does - from formal neo-Nazi groups to the ignorant prejudiced and everything in between - and it's the job of the rest of us to behave decently, speak up and act when necessary, and leave those half-wits on the margin, where they belong. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 10951171)
Many right-wing groups have tried to wrap themselves in assorted flags, and that includes the English flag and the Union flag.
The trick is to take it back. National symbols do not belong to them any more than the country does - from formal neo-Nazi groups to the ignorant prejudiced and everything in between - and it's the job of the rest of us to behave decently, speak up and act when necessary, and leave those half-wits on the margin, where they belong. Ooops, sorry, I got caught up in the thread for a second... as you were. |
Re: British standards ???
I want nothing to do with baldie tattooed prats who wrap themselves in the flag of st geaorge and nor do the majority of the UK population.
Sadly the image is tarnished not just in the UK but where ever these morons have been. There is nothng wrong in re branding England. After all the current flag is named after a greek mercenary who may or may not have existed and only came into use general use in the 20th century . Prior to that t was used by the RN because its design identifying UK vessels was easily seen by other ships. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by EMR
(Post 10951284)
I want nothing to do with baldie tattooed prats who wrap themselves in the flag of st geaorge and nor do the majority of the UK population.
Sadly the image is tarnished not just in the UK but where ever these morons have been. There is nothng wrong in re branding England. After all the current flag is named after a greek mercenary who may or may not have existed and only came into use general use in the 20th century . Prior to that t was used by the RN because its design identifying UK vessels was easily seen by other ships. |
Re: British standards ???
...and in the Crusades where it was flown by the English fleet to guarantee safe passage through the Med.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 10951171)
Many right-wing groups have tried to wrap themselves in assorted flags, and that includes the English flag and the Union flag.
The trick is to take it back. National symbols do not belong to them any more than the country does - from formal neo-Nazi groups to the ignorant prejudiced and everything in between - and it's the job of the rest of us to behave decently, speak up and act when necessary, and leave those half-wits on the margin, where they belong. :( would be interested in reading your treatise on how you plan on "taking the flag back" without upsetting a few fluffy bunnies :confused: |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10951363)
:(
would be interested in reading your treatise on how you plan on "taking the flag back" without upsetting a few fluffy bunnies :confused: 2. Behave decently, so the half-wits remain marginalized. It has worked pretty well in the UK for some time, on the whole. We don't have to follow along. 3.Freedom of expression is one of the things that needs to be upheld against all comers, even if I dislike what they are doing and saying. 4. By that same token, I reserve the right to speak up myself as I see fit, especially when others don't like it. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10951283)
****ing Commie bastard!
. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 10951494)
Still, at least I know a tongue-in-cheek comment when I hear it, eh? Puts me ahead of the game.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 10951492)
1. Use it
2. Behave decently, so the half-wits remain marginalized. It has worked pretty well in the UK for some time, on the whole. We don't have to follow along. 3.Freedom of expression is one of the things that needs to be upheld against all comers, even if I dislike what they are doing and saying. That hasn't removed the stigma that many have attached to it for quite a long time now. Plan B ? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10951585)
Continuing to use it in a responsible manner is what most people seem to have continued to do.
That hasn't removed the stigma that many have attached to it for quite a long time now. Plan B ? |
Re: British standards ???
There is a story here that I noticed on the front page of the sun today I thought its worth showing you guys why we dont want Sharia law to have any part in the UK
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/late...-her-jail-hell Its current |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952679)
There is a story here that I noticed on the front page of the sun today I thought its worth showing you guys why we dont want Sharia law to have any part in the UK
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/late...-her-jail-hell Its current |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952679)
There is a story here that I noticed on the front page of the sun today I thought its worth showing you guys why we dont want Sharia law to have any part in the UK
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/late...-her-jail-hell Its current Andy, you're a grown-up now - time to give up the comics and start reading newspapers. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952679)
There is a story here that I noticed on the front page of the sun today I thought its worth showing you guys why we dont want Sharia law to have any part in the UK
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/late...-her-jail-hell Its current Here's a fairly recent one, though I do recall BBC reports on similar incidents. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/08...n_3721980.html Never mind Andy, there's obviously quite a few BE posters rubbing their hands with glee at the mere thought of Sharia Law, whilst others continue to bury their heads in the sand. Just imagine if it ever applied in a country like Spain. Almost every single man woman and child would be in locked prison in no time at all, if there were enough prisons and guards to go round that is. What's in a kiss, eh ? |
Re: British standards ???
How mant times do we have to say it so that it gets into your thick heads. Sharia law is not legal in the UK and never will be.
Just as its not 100% legal in Egypt, Turkey and most of the North African states where Isalm is the predominant religion. There are parts which are against UK civil and criminal law . Typical right wing ****** stirring. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by EMR
(Post 10952809)
How mant times do we have to say it so that it gets into your thick heads. Sharia law is not legal in the UK and never will be.
Just as its not 100% legal in Egypt, Turkey and most of the North African states where Isalm is the predominant religion. There are parts which are against UK civil and criminal law . Typical right wing ****** stirring. You mean you aren't rubbing your hands in glee and Parliament isn't about to be overthrown by a group of radical imams? Well I never. To be fair, I think DD just wants a fight on BE - I don't think he could quite believe it either.:) |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10952783)
Quite a few similar cases have come to light in recent years.
Here's a fairly recent one, though I do recall BBC reports on similar incidents. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/08...n_3721980.html Never mind Andy, there's obviously quite a few BE posters rubbing their hands with glee at the mere thought of Sharia Law, whilst others continue to bury their heads in the sand. Just imagine if it ever applied in a country like Spain. Almost every single man woman and child would be in locked prison in no time at all, if there were enough prisons and guards to go round that is. What's in a kiss, eh ? What is the UK Government's attitude to this regime? I have not heard anybody voicing objections to the members of their ruling elite who buy expensive properties in London or the English countryside (nor in Marbella, come to think of it) or take over entire floors of luxury hotels with their entourage (including a number of wives - when polygamy is illegal in Britain - who wear the most extreme form of the burqua possible in public). Is it one law for the rich who we want to flog arms and other military hardware to (to the extent that investigations into corrupt business practices are ordered to be dropped by the British Government), and another for the poorer variety of Muslim? If so, perhaps we should consider this a "double standard". |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by EMR
(Post 10952809)
How mant times do we have to say it so that it gets into your thick heads. Sharia law is not legal in the UK and never will be.
Just as its not 100% legal in Egypt, Turkey and most of the North African states where Isalm is the predominant religion. There are parts which are against UK civil and criminal law . Typical right wing ****** stirring. Those 40% should accept our law without debate just like we would or rather should accept islamic law in Dubai. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 10952750)
Wow, who knew someone could become addicted to Valium and manage to beat the addiction, all within the space of two weeks - that's some going!
Andy, you're a grown-up now - time to give up the comics and start reading newspapers. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952914)
Yes but 40% according to a telegraph poll want it, so it reason for debate.
Those 40% should accept our law without debate just like we would or rather should accept islamic law in Dubai. Oh and the IRONY of you posting a link about a person who was clearly drinking in a country that clearly forbids it on a thread that suggests that people should live their lives according to the country they have chosen to live in is absolutely hilarious! |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10952932)
Oh and the IRONY of you posting a link about a person who was clearly drinking in a country that clearly forbids it on a thread that suggests that people should live their lives according to the country they have chosen to live in is absolutely hilarious! yes of course 40% of Muslims |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10952932)
40%? You mean 40% of the 1000 or so Muslims they polled in the survey right? I only ask because Islam represents about 4.8% of the British population so if you are suggesting that 40% of Britain want Sharia then there are some seriously messed up Christians, Sikhs, Hinus, Jews and Atheists in this country!
Oh and the IRONY of you posting a link about a person who was clearly drinking in a country that clearly forbids it on a thread that suggests that people should live their lives according to the country they have chosen to live in is absolutely hilarious! |
Re: British standards ???
So if only 4.8% of the UK population is Muslim and 13% of prisoners in the UK are muslim, there must be some real serious baddass gangstas amongst them.
Taking into consideration that out of the 4.8% there are young children, who would not be sent to jail anyway, Why would the number of criminals be so high. According to government figuers. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...E2rqLrXlLM5oYg |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952914)
Yes but 40% according to a telegraph poll want it, so it reason for debate.
Those 40% should accept our law without debate just like we would or rather should accept islamic law in Dubai. In so far as those hearings are extremely conservative, and a place where women are not given the same status as men, and where social pressure is brought to bear, I would join with you in criticizing them, just as I would any practice where people are not treated humanely and equally. The way women in Ireland were treated under Catholicism for a very long time would rank right up there, for example. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952943)
Matt the offence is one thing the punishment is another, if you think stoning women is hilarious then..................
yes of course 40% of Muslims Cheers sweet cheeks. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10952948)
Interesting the 4.8% as a third of youth prisoners are Muslim, and adults 13% of the prison population, if you like stats
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10952955)
So if only 4.8% of the UK population is Muslim and 13% of prisoners in the UK are muslim, there must be some real serious baddass gangstas amongst them.
Taking into consideration that out of the 4.8% there are young children, who would not be sent to jail anyway, Why would the number of criminals be so high. According to government figuers. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...E2rqLrXlLM5oYg One thing to note would be that the Muslim population of the UK is vastly over represented in poorest, most deprived segments of the population. http://www.mcb.org.uk/library/statistics.php#4 That raises crime anywhere and everywhere. In the US, for example, it is popular among the thoughtless and ignorant to say that black people are more prone to crime - and the very same over representation among the poor is true here. To suggest that one is more prone to crime because of one's religion is as nonsensical as saying that one is more prone to crime because of one's skin colour. |
Re: British standards ???
Too simple to point out that if 13% of prisoners are Muslim then that means 87% are NOT MUSLIM!!! Shocking statistics really....
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10952971)
Too simple to point out that if 13% of prisoners are Muslim then that means 87% are NOT MUSLIM!!!.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 10952974)
It's those damn Christians again.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10952971)
Too simple to point out that if 13% of prisoners are Muslim then that means 87% are NOT MUSLIM!!! Shocking statistics really....
I think a lesson in percentages and stats is needed |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10952982)
Or the Jews... they killed Christ you know?
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 10952987)
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10952985)
:rofl::confused::rofl::confused::rofl::confused::o :o
I think a lesson in percentages and stats is needed |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10952993)
Go on then....
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:01 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.