![]() |
Re: British standards ???
[QUOTE=andyrich666
There is no parallel court system in this country, and we have no intention of changing the position in any part of England and Wales [/QUOTE] Well, as a matter of fact, there is:- http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...s-1765888.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...al-ruling.html Read the second link in particular, because this acceptance by the British High Court of a decision of a rabbinical court is thought to bring the eventual acceptance of sharia law (at least in part) becoming recognised in Britain somewhat closer. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10941617)
Do you actually know what "Sharia law" means Mr Griffin?
lovely people |
Re: British standards ???
Question:
Why are rape victims often punished by Islamic courts as adulterers? Summary Answer: Under Islamic law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience are actually confessing to having sex. If they or the accused happens to be married, then it is considered to be adultery. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 10941627)
Well, as a matter of fact, there is:-
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...s-1765888.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...al-ruling.html Read the second link in particular, because this acceptance by the British High Court of a decision of a rabbinical court is thought to bring the eventual acceptance of sharia law (at least in part) becoming recognised in Britain somewhat closer. |
Re: British standards ???
I have a flat in East London which I bought donks ago. It is now in an almost totally Muslim area, and they have, understandably, brought their culture with them, and have built mosques for places to worship and schools for their children and everything else to make them feel at home.
The original British population have mostly moved out when their lives became too uncomfortable for them. What sensible comment can you make? I couldn't move back there and if I returned to the UK would sell my place to live somewhere else, because I would feel too uncomfortable to live there now. That's the reality and that's how it is - my former local pub is now a very nice looking mosque. I believe Sharia law is administered from a house a hundred yards or so from where my flat is situated. I believe in live and let live and I have no problem with the Muslim population who live there, but I couldn't live that way because I'm not a Muslim. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10941634)
Question:
Why are rape victims often punished by Islamic courts as adulterers? Summary Answer: Under Islamic law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience are actually confessing to having sex. If they or the accused happens to be married, then it is considered to be adultery. It is difficult enough under British law to get a conviction for rape, (that is why so many do not bother to prosecute) and usually it is the word of one man against of one woman. If there has to be 4 male witnesses then there is no chance for justice for the woman. If find the whole thing disgusting.:thumbdown::thumbdown: A rapist would not have to be a genius to work out that you can get off scott free if you only rape infront of 3 witnesses. (sick) |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10941689)
All this crap has no place in the UK.
It is difficult enough under British law to get a conviction for rape, (that is why so many do not bother to prosecute) and usually it is the word of one man against of one woman. If there has to be 4 male witnesses then there is no chance for justice for the woman. If find the whole thing disgusting.:thumbdown::thumbdown: A rapist would not have to be a genius to work out that you can get off scott free if you only rape infront of 3 witnesses. (sick) By the way what does "YKWYA" mean? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jonboy
(Post 10941707)
So all men are complicit in the rape of women? That is what you appear to be saying.
By the way what does "YKWYA" mean? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jonboy
(Post 10941707)
So all men are complicit in the rape of women? That is what you appear to be saying.
By the way what does "YKWYA" mean? Rosemary |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by andyrich666
(Post 10941709)
No wonder they gang rape, they have all the witnesses
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Rosemary
(Post 10941718)
You Know Who You Are.
Rosemary |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 10941627)
Well, as a matter of fact, there is:-
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...s-1765888.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...al-ruling.html Read the second link in particular, because this acceptance by the British High Court of a decision of a rabbinical court is thought to bring the eventual acceptance of sharia law (at least in part) becoming recognised in Britain somewhat closer. The criminal matters is much different and warrant no place in our society |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 10941689)
All this crap has no place in the UK.
It is difficult enough under British law to get a conviction for rape, (that is why so many do not bother to prosecute) and usually it is the word of one man against of one woman. If there has to be 4 male witnesses then there is no chance for justice for the woman. If find the whole thing disgusting.:thumbdown::thumbdown: A rapist would not have to be a genius to work out that you can get off scott free if you only rape infront of 3 witnesses. (sick) |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jonboy
(Post 10941707)
So all men are complicit in the rape of women? That is what you appear to be saying.
By the way what does "YKWYA" mean? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10941773)
I agree, disgusting in the extreme, as to my mind are any apologists who try to feebly excuse such obscenities occuring in what should by now be an equal rights civilised society.
And TKWTA. :thumbdown::thumbdown: Because no matter what islam is not an equal rights for both sexes religion, and it is always the woman that gets the mucky end of the stick. It may be a good idea for those apologists to read the followin article about sharia in the UK, it makes grim reading. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ia-courts.html There is no place for any of this, if people want to live by sharia law, they should go to a country where it is the norm. Nobody should have any law above the law of the land, if not is a bad road to go down. The UK has enough problems without the extra ones that sharia brings. It comes to something when the tails wags the dog, manda huevos!!! |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:37 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.