Lockdown
#151
Re: Lockdown
Let's ask csfd
Realistically, yes they have, but no one in charge can listen or acknowledge this type of analysis if they ever want to stay in power again. It's just politically not acceptable to say that some loss of life is acceptable. Remember, the curve is only being flattened, not eradicated - the area under it is expected to be the same.
Realistically, yes they have, but no one in charge can listen or acknowledge this type of analysis if they ever want to stay in power again. It's just politically not acceptable to say that some loss of life is acceptable. Remember, the curve is only being flattened, not eradicated - the area under it is expected to be the same.
#152
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
#153
Re: Lockdown
2008-2009 and the government manipulation of money supply; rates, austerity and inflation.
general expansion of state is what happened... then populism creeps in, which is a disaster.
#154
Re: Lockdown
I'm sure they have but my point is more directed at you than them. If you think this is an overreaction what are you comparing it against on the other side of the coin? This is the current scenario and this the possible scenario if we don't have a lock down. Surely that's the choice we are making - not what we did during the Spanish flu or last outbreak of winter flu.
#155
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Lockdown
Guess you could say I'm arguing your point but I'm sure we could find good arguments both ways on all of these events to be fair.
I don't think the UK will turn into North Korea after this though.
#158
Re: Lockdown
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
#159
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,520
Re: Lockdown
World GDP is around $85,000 billion
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
This notion that some people have that we're at war with a virus is silly. The virus cannot be vanquished. It's not an enemy that can be humbled and reformed into obedience. It's here. We have to deal with it. A vaccine in due time (if one is found) will help, but it won't end the virus no more than the regular flu vaccine defeated the flu. Herd immunity is the most likely long term outlook. The one size fits all mass shutdown was an attempt to declare war on the virus and we have seen the obscene economic toll paid so far, and when all's said and done, didn't really save lives. This one size fits all mass shutdown did have the advantage of buying some time but that time has also showed us the virus is far less deadly for the larger population than earlier believed. It has always been obvious to me from the early days the pragmatic approach was to quarantine the care homes and identified high-risk people still living in their own homes. Instead of devoting so much resources to mass testing of general populations, test everyone who works for a care home, and test them daily to prevent asymptomatic people from transferring the virus to the care homes or hospitals. And let everyone else get on with life.
#160
Just Joined
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 12
Re: Lockdown
IC, Satwa and Al Quoz is at the top of my list for the next wave of total shutdown and cleaning. Then, if there is a God, it will be the ***** at the marina, just because.
What I hear coming out of some of the labour camps at Al Quoz isn't so great. What you have to remember is that this is where your supermarket assistant and security guard lives.
What I hear coming out of some of the labour camps at Al Quoz isn't so great. What you have to remember is that this is where your supermarket assistant and security guard lives.
Genuinely would rather be in prison here in the UK, than a labour camp during Covid.
#161
Re: Lockdown
World GDP is around $85,000 billion
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
Last edited by csdf; Apr 23rd 2020 at 4:59 am.
#163
#164
Re: Lockdown
World GDP is around $85,000 billion
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
World population is around 8 billion
GDP/ person = $10,000
Cost of COVID - estimated between 2,000 and 4,000 billion
Worst case number of estimated deaths is between 2 and 50 million
2,000-4000 billion cost / 2-50 million = between 40,000 - 2,000,000 per life saved
So somewhere between 4 and 200 times the GDP per person.
Now if it's mostly the old and ill dying, then maybe we should have used a lower GDP/person as these people could be economically inactive.
Worth it? That's the political decision that no one wants to make.
What we do know is that the economic destruction we are doing will drive millions into poverty and expose them to all sorts of illnesses and premature deaths that won't get accounted for.
Lets take worst case of 50 million deaths times your GDP per person of 10,000USD that's 500 Billion per year. Conservatively giving them 6 years life expectancy we reach the equivalent 3,000 Billion spread over 6 years. I guess this is the flattening of the financial curve.
#165
Re: Lockdown
Understood, but that stimulus package isn't disappearing into thin air, it's being spent and injected into the economy and ultimately into people's hands. Whether it's the right people is another matter.