![]() |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7457947)
I don't think this is a bad thing.
Surely it gives the other team a better chance of winning. It gives the 2nd string players a chance of playing alongside 1st team regulars, gaining valuable experience to allow them to progress to the 1st team if they do well.
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7457947)
Arsenal usually do well in cup competions with the youngsters. This would imply to me that our 'kids' are better than a lot of our opponent's 1st teams!
Isn't that sad though, the top 4's reserves are better than other teams 1st teams.
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7457947)
Should we just make the 2nd team players play reserve games and not give them a chance to develop further. A number of former Arsenal 2nd team players are now regular 1st team players at other Premier League clubs. Are these clubs settling for 2nd rate players, or were they good players who were unlucky not to get 1st team games.
Lucky other teams, grasping at straws. Of course players should get a chance, players have always been given a chance, the odd one may get a game here and there as part of their development. But to play a team of reserves in what is supposed to be the world's premier cup competition, says it all really. Swansea are currently blooding a young player called Joe Allen, he will be a star one day, we don't have two teams we can put out and expect a win though. the loan market is another indicator, teams can no longer carry enough of a squad to carry them through, instead they 'borrow' players when they need them and the Premier teams have so many players they can't possibly play them all. The loss of the TV money has caused problems all the way down the football ladder, including grass roots level. Of course Rio Ferdinand needs that third Porche and Christian Ronaldo he second Ferrari.. why not? Its only money! I know I sound a depressive, I'm not really, I enjoy supporting my team and hope we get success, whatever that means these days, I just look up at the thieves at the top and shake my head in disbelief in what they have got away with. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 7460157)
No, no, that was me. ;) Although I was in the stand for the home legs of all the UEFA Cup (oh, allright, Fairs Cup) matches in the '69 winning season. (Apart from that whatsit called the Intertoto or summat, that was the last time they actually won anything).
<I think you meant Wyn Davies>. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by PeterF
(Post 7460205)
BUT it waters down and de-values the competition. Which is where we are, Portsmouth v Cardiff final FFS!!
Originally Posted by PeterF
(Post 7460205)
I assume here your an Arsenal fan, as your reference to 'ours' cannot really imply that you are of French/African decent, which is where most of Arsenal kids come from.
Originally Posted by PeterF
(Post 7460205)
Isn't that sad though, the top 4's reserves are better than other teams 1st teams.
Originally Posted by PeterF
(Post 7460205)
Of course players should get a chance, players have always been given a chance, the odd one may get a game here and there as part of their development. But to play a team of reserves in what is supposed to be the world's premier cup competition, says it all really.
I know I sound a depressive, I'm not really, I enjoy supporting my team and hope we get success, whatever that means these days, I just look up at the thieves at the top and shake my head in disbelief in what they have got away with. No-one's 'got away' with anything. Unless you have proof of otherwise. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7460679)
Yes, I'm an Arsenal fan. Most of our reserve tam players are European, from the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and from Scandinavia. I'm not a fan of FIFA's proposed idea of making teams play a minimum of 5 English players in any starting XI as I feel that if these players are good enough they'd be playing anyway. If they aren't, how would these players feel to know they're just making up a quota? I'd call that reserve discrimination.
Second: I'm old school on this. I'd prefer to have a rule that only a minority (the smaller the better) of players in a club can represent a team other than the nearest geographically to where they were born. Impractical for sure, but it would give at least a little meaning to the sense of "we" for supporters. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 7460937)
Two points; the big clubs (and here I'm not just talking about the top four) buy talent in rather than develop homegrown. Works for them, but not for the national side.
Second: I'm old school on this. I'd prefer to have a rule that only a minority (the smaller the better) of players in a club can represent a team other than the nearest geographically to where they were born. Impractical for sure, but it would give at least a little meaning to the sense of "we" for supporters. Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England? |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7461020)
Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England?
Kids don't play out any more. Parents are afraid to let them out to play in the street as we did as kids. Or they don't want to play out anyway they would rather sit in front of telly or computer playing games. Very little talent is being developed at the grass roots level according to them. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7461020)
Your first point is a very good one, but I personally am not interested in what helps the England national team, nor any other.
Would forcing clubs to play a minimum number of "home-grown" players improve the national team, or even improve the league clubs? The only team I'm aware of in the Premier League who field a large number of players born locally are Middlesbrough, and how many of those players except Downing play regularly for England? Edit:On re-reading your post, you're conflating my two points in your 2nd paragraph. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
I do agree more needs to kids kids involved in the game, and they are the ones who'll become future players at the various levels. Until those numbers get much higher, there isn't going to be any improvement in the status quo.
Another reason teams buy players from abroad is the cost. Look at any transfer window and compare the cost of British players against foreign ones. If the prices were similar then I think clubs would buy more home-grown players. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7461057)
I do agree more needs to kids kids involved in the game, and they are the ones who'll become future players at the various levels. Until those numbers get much higher, there isn't going to be any improvement in the status quo.
Another reason teams buy players from abroad is the cost. Look at any transfer window and compare the cost of British players against foreign ones. If the prices were similar then I think clubs would buy more home-grown players. Two Brits in the top 12 record transfer fees. Rank Player From To Transfer Fee (£m) Year 1 Zinedine Zidane Juventus Real Madrid 46.0[1] 2001 2 LuÃs Figo Barcelona Real Madrid 38.7[2] 2000 3 Hernán Crespo Parma Lazio 35.5[3] 2000 4 Gianluigi Buffon Parma Juventus 32.6[4] 2001 5 Christian Vieri Lazio Internazionale 32.0[5] 1999 6 Andriy Shevchenk Milan Chelsea 30.8[6] 2006 7 Pavel NedvÄ›d Lazio Juventus 30.6[7] 2001 8 Wayne Rooney Everton Manchester Utd 30.0[8] 2004 9 Rio Ferdinand Leeds Utd Manchester Utd 29.5[9] 2002 10 Gaizka Mendieta Valencia Lazio 29.0[10] 2001 11 Ronaldo Internazionale Real Madrid 28.49[11] 2002 12 Juan Sebastián Verón Lazio Manchester Utd 28.1[12] 2001 |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 7461083)
Two Brits in the top 12 record transfer fees.
Steven Gerrard Wayne Rooney Rio Ferdinand Frank Lampard John Terry |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
The barcodes looked pretty sorry against the Spurs this afternoon. Bringing on unfit and injured strikers was desperation to say the least.
I'm sorry but I think one more loss and the team is going to be enjoying life in the Championship. Hopefully they won't do a Leeds and will be back up soon as we'll miss their quaint and jolly fans. :) |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 7494082)
The barcodes looked pretty sorry against the Spurs this afternoon. Bringing on unfit and injured strikers was desperation to say the least.
I'm sorry but I think one more loss and the team is going to be enjoying life in the Championship. Hopefully they won't do a Leeds and will be back up soon as we'll miss their quaint and jolly fans. :) There's no way a point would have been deserved overall, but the lads aren't having any lucky breaks right now. Meanwhile, I'll do my best to continue to be quaint and jolly. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Its tough one when you handle the ball in the box and where that also gives you the opportunity to shoot.
What's Shearer thinking? "It's still tha best cloob in tha woooooould man!" :rofl: http://www.sportbox.tv/images/action...wcastle_47.jpg |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 7494128)
Its tough one when you handle the ball in the box and where that also gives you the opportunity to shoot.
What's Shearer thinking? "It's still tha best cloob in tha woooooould man!" :rofl: http://www.sportbox.tv/images/action...wcastle_47.jpg Shearer's from Yorkshire? Who knew? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:43 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.