![]() |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7497682)
Actually no. 1st, 2nd and 3rd gets automatic CL this season, 4th gets pre-qualification against another European team in the same position (loser goes into UEFA Cup (Europa League as it's going to be named from next season, and involving Far East teams), and 5th gets automatic into the UEFA Cup as well.
Liverpool only got into CL in 5th place as UEFA didn't like the bad publicity of the CL holders failing to qualify for the following season. In terms qualifying I would prefer Liverpool to always go through this process as although it has the feel of a friendly match you don't know the opposition and therefore you need to approach the game with real caution, in that sense it is a great way to prepare for a season. I will be disappointed next year as Liverpool will actually have no competition until match day 1 of the premier league next year. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by livermanl
(Post 7497693)
I know but I said in Jest.
In terms qualifying I would prefer Liverpool to always go through this process as although it has the feel of a friendly match you don't know the opposition and therefore you need to approach the game with real caution, in that sense it is a great way to prepare for a season. I will be disappointed next year as Liverpool will actually have no competition until match day 1 of the premier league next year. At least the Liverpool players will be well rested as there aren't any international competitions at the end of the season, though we are finishing later. It'll give the new manager time to get to know the players, who'll also need to get to know their new team-mates should the new owners splash the cash. :p:p |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7497715)
Apologies. I had my sarcasm detector switched off as we were discussing Scousers. :p It interferes with my anti-shellsuit defence system, and I've never needed both at the same time. ;)
At least the Liverpool players will be well rested as there aren't any international competitions at the end of the season, though we are finishing later. It'll give the new manager time to get to know the players, who'll also need to get to know their new team-mates should the new owners splash the cash. :p:p I agree that it could be a good thing giving certain players time to recover A.K.A. Gerrard and Torres cause it seems they are played whether injured or not nowadays. But I find Liverpool at the start of the season quite devoid of teamwork so the less they play the more prone to errors we seem to be. Since Rafa has taken over we always seem to be in the best form at the end of the season, i'm pretty sure this can be attributed to confusing tactics for the players gelling in the latter stages. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by livermanl
(Post 7497739)
Do you know of a certain manager getting the boot?
I agree that it could be a good thing giving certain players time to recover A.K.A. Gerrard and Torres cause it seems they are played whether injured or not nowadays. But I find Liverpool at the start of the season quite devoid of teamwork so the less they play the more prone to errors we seem to be. Since Rafa has taken over we always seem to be in the best form at the end of the season, i'm pretty sure this can be attributed to confusing tactics for the players gelling in the latter stages. I have heard that Hicks and Gillette are trying to sell out, and I've heard the Gillette is also trying to sell the Montreal Canadians hockey team as well. Any new owner is going to want to bring their own manager in 99% of the time. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Greenhill
(Post 7497928)
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Greenhill
(Post 7497928)
His accent reminds me of the geordie guy on Alan Partridge who Steve Coogan found incomprehensible. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
its coooming, its coooming, I can feel it in the water. :rofl:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/...id=20156276001 |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 7498683)
its coooming, its coooming, I can feel it in the water. :rofl:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/...id=20156276001 |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7497747)
EWven though I understand he's just signed a new contract, all that does really is increase how much compensation he'd get if he was fired.
I have heard that Hicks and Gillette are trying to sell out, and I've heard the Gillette is also trying to sell the Montreal Canadians hockey team as well. Any new owner is going to want to bring their own manager in 99% of the time. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7497747)
EWven though I understand he's just signed a new contract, all that does really is increase how much compensation he'd get if he was fired.
I have heard that Hicks and Gillette are trying to sell out, and I've heard the Gillette is also trying to sell the Montreal Canadians hockey team as well. Any new owner is going to want to bring their own manager in 99% of the time. I'm not sure how often new ownership brings a change of manager? Man City and Man U didnt... I suppose it depends on who the incumbent is and how good a job they are doing. Personally I cant see liverpool bringing in a new manager with new ownership...just as the Glazers knew a good thing when they saw it with Man U, I dont think any new owners would dream of ditching Raffa, and why rile up the (majority) of supporters who are behind him. It is a bit odd though that after Liverpools best playing season in years, there is the distinct possibility that the third best team in the city is better placed to bring home a trophy than the reds:unsure: |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 7499775)
The main thing it did is give him the control over transfers that he thinks he needs to bridge the gap to the top of the table.
I'm not sure how often new ownership brings a change of manager? Man City and Man U didnt... I suppose it depends on who the incumbent is and how good a job they are doing. Personally I cant see liverpool bringing in a new manager with new ownership...just as the Glazers knew a good thing when they saw it with Man U, I dont think any new owners would dream of ditching Raffa, and why rile up the (majority) of supporters who are behind him. I guess the change depends on whether the new owners (if any) think Rafa's done enough to stay, or whether they see another possibly under-achieving season as the future under Rafa. I hope he stays.
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 7499775)
It is a bit odd though that after Liverpools best playing season in years, there is the distinct possibility that the third best team in the city is better placed to bring home a trophy than the reds:unsure:
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 7499775)
It is a bit odd though that after Liverpools best playing season in years, there is the distinct possibility that the third best team in the city is better placed to bring home a trophy than the reds:unsure:
I heard a story from the weekend that Mark Lawrenson was being pursued by a bunch of little scallies down wembley way and nearly getting hit by a bus...who says the friendly derby has gone! |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by andrewrb143
(Post 7501307)
Remember the good old days...Everton and Liverpool at Wembley chanting Merseyside...fans travelling together...
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Good result for ManUre there.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:29 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.