![]() |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544155)
Plus where would they find a sponsor who would support both Blue and Red halfs of the city... incurring the never ending wrath of both!
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
The Liverpool Echo would do. Hang on, change that name!
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by expatasia
(Post 8544195)
The Liverpool Echo would do. Hang on, change that name!
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544220)
Or The Sun? Sure the Everton fans wouldnt care, but some of the Liverpool ones might have a problem with that!....
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544076)
I dont have any problem with a Liverpool groundshare, It works in Turin, It works in Rome, It makes a hell of a lot more sense than both teams spending £500+m on their own ground, you could have integrated public transport to a single ground, I just dont get why its so impossible for people to consider.
Getting back to footie, I think that either Torres or Benitez will go over the summer and that Gerrard may be tempted as well. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544220)
Or The Sun? Sure the Everton fans wouldnt care, but some of the Liverpool ones might have a problem with that!.... groundshare, bound to cut down sponsorship opportunities. I suppose it could have different names depending who the home team is on any given day...
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8544392)
The problem for Liverpool is the same one Leeds have faced. Unless its a flukey cup tie they'll never be able to fill the ground once they're in division one or two.
Newcastle did the same. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544076)
I dont have any problem with a Liverpool groundshare, It works in Turin, It works in Rome...I just dont get why its so impossible for people to consider.
Bristol Rovers had a temporary share with City. It wasn't liked but had circumstances meant it had to go for longer, people might have become accustomed to it. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544412)
Smartass:p. While Leeds may not fill Elland Road I think you will find that they have managed to retain reasonable attendaces (20-30k) in the lower leagues, far in advance of what most teams in those leagues have to operate on.
Newcastle did the same. *After Manure, Arsenal and Man City. Ahead of Liverpool & Chelsea and the rest of the rabble. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8544443)
Or rather better. Average home crowd this year was 43,400 at St. James's, the fourth highest in the country.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8544450)
Because, apart from smoking tabs and drinking brown ale there's nought ought to do pet.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8544449)
I don't believe Liverpool's problems this season are solely down to Benitez. Yes, he picked the teams, but he (hopefully picked those who did the best in training and those players did not do the business when it mattered. I'll admit I know very little about managing a football team, but I'd have lost patience with most of them long before now and would have fielded the reserve team for one match, just to show the regulars that they aren't beyond dropping. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8544449)
I think he, like rafa, will wait a while and see what happens with the ownership. The difference is that the new ownership would clearly want him to be there this time next year. If you were the ownership would you sell him now, or wait till after the world cup when he may be worth even more (or perhaps less) depending on how things go... Would Gerrard leave after all the chelsea related soul searching? Or would they give him a push to free up some wages? Interesting summer ahead... |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8544472)
I don't believe Liverpool's problems this season are solely down to Benitez. Yes, he picked the teams, but he (hopefully picked those who did the best in training and those players did not do the business when it mattered. I'll admit I know very little about managing a football team, but I'd have lost patience with most of them long before now and would have fielded the reserve team for one match, just to show the regulars that they aren't beyond dropping.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:46 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.