![]() |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Cape Blue
(Post 11011315)
Of course they're not - God hates poofs.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jQf5jL3a4iU
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11011318)
Apartheid avoided a lot of potential unpleasantness too :)
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11010057)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25119158
interesting situation Is this a case of political correctness gone mad? or do homosexuals automatically have the gawd-given right to be catered to even if the hotel owner thinks different? |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11011314)
i think that is an intelligent approach
every one goes home happy no legal battles to prove a point |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11011286)
They are running a business, you can't turn away customers because you don't like them being gay, or short, or foriegn, or Catholic, or carnivores, or disabled. I wonder if they ran through the 10 Commandments with all guests, or maybe checked compliance with Leviticus?
:goodpost::goodpost::goodpost: |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by paulry
(Post 11011598)
Agreed. It is a middle path that allows the two different lifestyles to co-exist.
|
Re: gays not welcomed
BBC News
The case in the Supreme Court is only the latest by British courts in which Christians have pitted their right to behave in accordance with their religious beliefs against the right of other people not to face discrimination and lost. Defeat in court has been compounded in some cases by the remarks of senior judges, making clear that their job is no longer to enforce morality, and that religious beliefs will not be given more weight than secular values. The Bulls had argued that what they claimed was only indirect discrimination against Mr Hall and Mr Preddy was justified in law by their rights to "manifest their religion" under the European Convention on Human Rights, but the Supreme Court disagreed. It makes their case another milestone in the waning influence of Christian teaching in British society and its laws, although the exact nature of that teaching is increasingly contested as many Christians reinterpret traditional beliefs in the light of contemporary experience. This is from the bbc and is a good summary and it boils down to religious convictions vs discrimination in society I had termed it 'individual vs collective' rights. In other words what the state considers to be 'the greater good'. In this event, predictably, religion lost out My point, playing devil's advocate, has always been that this was not all that clear cut, that it was not about being anti-homosexual, as most posters on this thread would infer, BUT that there are two sides to the story And as has been pointed out, the appeal was doomed from the start. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11011900)
BBC News
The case in the Supreme Court is only the latest by British courts in which Christians have pitted their right to behave in accordance with their religious beliefs against the right of other people not to face discrimination and lost. Defeat in court has been compounded in some cases by the remarks of senior judges, making clear that their job is no longer to enforce morality, and that religious beliefs will not be given more weight than secular values. The Bulls had argued that what they claimed was only indirect discrimination against Mr Hall and Mr Preddy was justified in law by their rights to "manifest their religion" under the European Convention on Human Rights, but the Supreme Court disagreed. It makes their case another milestone in the waning influence of Christian teaching in British society and its laws, although the exact nature of that teaching is increasingly contested as many Christians reinterpret traditional beliefs in the light of contemporary experience. This is from the bbc and is a good summary and it boils down to religious convictions vs discrimination in society I had termed it individual vs collective rights In this event, predictably, religion lost out My point, playing devil's advocate, has always been that this was not all that clear cut, as most posters on this thread would indicate, and that there are two sides to the story And as has been pointed out, the appeal was doomed from the start |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11011919)
Religion should always lose out. A "religious conviction" that requires that anyone other than the person holding the conviction do, or not do, anything is just an excuse for bullying.
I wanted to show on this thread that there are two sides to the story, as opposed to discussing whether it was blatant discrimination which, from society's point of view, it clearly is. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11011938)
That is another opinion, and may be as valid as others, or not.
Gays, bicyclists, women, religions choose their targets whimsically. Their positions can only be justified by reference to non-existent authorities. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11011938)
That is another opinion, and may be as valid as others, or not.
I wanted to show on this thread that there are two sides to the story, as opposed to discussing whether it was blatant discrimination which, from society's point of view, it clearly is. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11011900)
It makes their case another milestone in the waning influence of Christian teaching in British society and its laws, although the exact nature of that teaching is increasingly contested as many Christians reinterpret traditional beliefs in the light of contemporary experience. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Their license can just be revoked, with a caveat put in by the city as to what running that sort of business requires in order to get a license.
See if they still want to run the business then.... It will be akin to having grocery stores have disable parking spots close to the entrance in numbers that don't even get used at any one time...yes we've all seen those. |
Re: gays not welcomed
I think it's worth mentioning that not all Christians think homosexuality is a sin. We have very good friends who are gay, male, married and Christian. They practise the good bits of Christianity, tolerance, understanding, charity, kindness, compassion. How do those practices get overlooked by the Bible thumpers?
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11011977)
I think it's worth mentioning that not all Christians think homosexuality is a sin. We have very good friends who are gay, male, married and Christian. They practise the good bits of Christianity, tolerance, understanding, charity, kindness, compassion. How do those practices get overlooked by the Bible thumpers?
Their books a n d Bibles, do quote, you get there by accepting that certain acts, are not to be tolerated or cordoned...10 commandments for example. So to their credit the so called Bible thumpers do try and keep to "their faith" Something that I find strange...though I am an agnostic, If you are a believer in a particular faith and its teachings, then ...so shouldnt non believers Be able to see that ALL is entwined in politics, land law, and everyday life, there is no Seperation...in fact Christian based countries, their laws are sworn in by... """"In God we trust"""" or swearing on the Bible. As Societies, we still havent got it right....hey before somebody jumps down my throat I aint preaching, just threw some thought into the ring. My faith...is the NATURE, Budhist ways, without bowing to Buddah, Islam ways, without bowing to mohammed, christianity, without bowing to christ, Sikism, without, following a guru, Hinduism without bowing to its deities, And I allow myself in times of stress or frustration to shout out "oh God" In gay relationships we have come far relevant to acceptance tolerance and law, But think this...if we were all homosexual...human life wo u ldnt go on, But I would jump in a trench to fight their rights:rofl: |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by fuchs01
(Post 11012028)
The good bits of christianity, like the good bits of all Beliefs and Religous thoughts,
Their books a n d Bibles, do quote, you get there by accepting that certain acts, are not to be tolerated or cordoned...10 commandments for example. So to their credit the so called Bible thumpers do try and keep to "their faith" Something that I find strange...though I am an agnostic, If you are a believer in a particular faith and its teachings, then ...so shouldnt non believers Be able to see that ALL is entwined in politics, land law, and everyday life, there is no Seperation...in fact Christian based countries, their laws are sworn in by... """"In God we trust"""" or swearing on the Bible. As Societies, we still havent got it right....hey before somebody jumps down my throat I aint preaching, just threw some thought into the ring. My faith...is the NATURE, Budhist ways, without bowing to Buddah, Islam ways, without bowing to mohammed, christianity, without bowing to christ, Sikism, without, following a guru, Hinduism without bowing to its deities, And I allow myself in times of stress or frustration to shout out "oh God" In gay relationships we have come far relevant to acceptance tolerance and law, But think this...if we were all homosexual...human life wo u ldnt go on, But I would jump in a trench to fight their rights:rofl: |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:23 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.