![]() |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 11018701)
Is it ? I thought it was about a couple who were unfairly and unlawfully refused accommodation because of their sexual orientation ?
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11018873)
Well, the IRA are, by and large, Catholic. It may not be their Catholicism that motivates their terrorism but I think people like Martin McGuinness and Gerry Adams illustrate that one can be both religious and destructive.
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 11018884)
The hotel policy was to not accommodate all non married couples not just same gender couples.
|
Re: gays not welcomed
How about those two South London young men that murdered Lee Rigby. What was it that warped their mind to the point where they decided to commit a brutal murder. Religion. Islam to be precise. Murder is not permitted under C of E rules (thou shalt not kill, and all that).
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11018936)
How about those two South London young men that murdered Lee Rigby. What was it that warped their mind to the point where they decided to commit a brutal murder. Religion. Islam to precise. Murder is not permitted under C of E rules (thou shalt not kill, and all that).
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 11018906)
And Bin Ladin was undoubtedly a Muslim. In all three cases, if they had been better adherents to their religion they would not have done what they did.
Sticking with Catholicism for a moment, I think we can agree that paedophile priests are destructive, I suspect we can agree that popes who keep such behaviour secret are destructive. All involved are properly, definitively, Catholic. They're not evil because they're Catholic, being good or bad is independent of one's religion. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11018954)
... being good or bad is independent of one's religion.
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 11018949)
How many murders were committed in the UK last year? How many would you likely think had a religious motivation or association?
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11018954)
They're not evil because they're Catholic, being good or bad is independent of one's religion.
Can't recall the source of the quote, but there is some truth in it. For the Catholic pedo's in your example, it's not the Church that has made them pedo, but the Church that has elevated their status and has brainwashed the young boys to respect them that facilitates the abuse. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Religion and religious belief can be a very flexible thing. I remember one guy at work sounding off about gays & lesbians and how they offended his catholic faith.
He then got very stroppy when asked how being an unmarried parent of two meshed with his apparently "devout" faith. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11018992)
Would it matter? Even if the proportion in tiny, even one murder that has been brought about by religious reasons it too many. There are always going to be murders due to human emotions (rage, jealousy, etc) but a murder or child abuse that is motivated by religious belief is a tragedy that could be prevented with enlightenment. We don't burn witches any more, but there was time when religion recommended that we do just that. Christian religion is being watered down to suit the times, my view (since I see it as a big fiction) is that we need to accelerate that process. Are you a believer??
Christian theology and doctrine has always been in a state of evolution. I dealt with my personal opinion at the top of the thread. I am on no crusade to demonise and belittle believers either though. I have in laws who have been in a same gender relationship for nearly 3 decades. They are regular church attenders and have lay positions within the church. They don't find the two aspects to their lives incompatible. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by JGK
(Post 11019035)
Religion and religious belief can be a very flexible thing. I remember one guy at work sounding off about gays & lesbians and how they offended his catholic faith.
He then got very stroppy when asked how being an unmarried parent of two meshed with his apparently "devout" faith. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11017710)
that is a fair question
I have been raised in the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman and at my ripe old age I am not inclined to modernise my views It is not a matter of being against homosexuals as I have said several times I have difficulty in understanding why, to homosexuals, the term 'same-sex civil union' would not suffice, since it does not affect their rights in any way Maybe someone here can explain to me why the term marriage in a same sex situation is so important and worth fighting for? The term marriage, is that exact area , where somegroups want to protect, other groups, believe it is their right in law to aspire towards, others again believe its the only way to show the differences . Personally I have no hard-headed stance on this, but humans no matter, what their preferences, will fight and demonstrate, to gain recognition to have their rights accepted, if not understood. There are here factions who argue to and fro on the Term MARRIAGE/MATRIMONY For many years the church or religious flocks, layed ownership and paths to this Union or contract. Then states with or without pro religious scenarios, made Marriage a right of law. There are are people, and I am sure some on this site, who got married in a church but left any relegious thoughts and beliefs behind well before they gave the yes word. Now I am leaving what I and montreal.mike just mentioned, standing as it is.... I have no self-opionated, or rightious stance on this, I suppose it will run its Course. I dont even think a smiley would help.. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11017710)
that is a fair question
I have been raised in the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman and at my ripe old age I am not inclined to modernise my views It is not a matter of being against homosexuals as I have said several times I have difficulty in understanding why, to homosexuals, the term 'same-sex civil union' would not suffice, since it does not affect their rights in any way Maybe someone here can explain to me why the term marriage in a same sex situation is so important and worth fighting for? The term marriage, is that exact area , where somegroups want to protect, other groups, believe it is their right in law to aspire towards, others again believe its the only way to show the differences . Personally I have no hard-headed stance on this, but humans no matter, what their preferences, will fight and demonstrate, to gain recognition to have their rights accepted, if not understood. There are here factions who argue to and fro on the Term MARRIAGE/MATRIMONY For many years the church or religious flocks, layed ownership and paths to this Union or contract. Then states with or without pro religious scenarios, made Marriage a right of law. There are are people, and I am sure some on this site, who got married in a church but left any relegious thoughts and beliefs behind well before they gave the yes word. Now I am leaving what I and montreal.mike just mentioned, standing as it is.... I have no self-opionated, or rightious stance on this, I suppose it will run its Course. I dont even think a smiley would help.. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by fuchs01
(Post 11019081)
:goodpost:
The term marriage, is that exact area , where somegroups want to protect, other groups, believe it is their right in law to aspire towards, others again believe its the only way to show the differences . Personally I have no hard-headed stance on this, but humans no matter, what their preferences, will fight and demonstrate, to gain recognition to have their rights accepted, if not understood. There are here factions who argue to and fro on the Term MARRIAGE/MATRIMONY For many years the church or religious flocks, layed ownership and paths to this Union or contract. Then states with or without pro religious scenarios, made Marriage a right of law. There are are people, and I am sure some on this site, who got married in a church but left any relegious thoughts and beliefs behind well before they gave the yes word. Now I am leaving what I and montreal.mike just mentioned, standing as it is.... I have no self-opionated, or rightious stance on this, I suppose it will run its Course. I dont even think a smiley would help.. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:28 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.