![]() |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
(Post 12085935)
Nope it is one man one vote = 15 mil beats 13 mil. Surely even you can understand that basic fact???
The EU has a democracy deficit for sure. EU: 1 nation, 1 vote. UK: England should be able to force brexit even if everyone in Scotland, NI and Wales voted remain simply because England is BIGGER. Surely you can see the difference, right? :unsure:
Originally Posted by Bermudashorts
(Post 12085181)
We were voting on leaving the EU. We were not voting on trade deals, spending policy or anything else.
If I agree to a surgical procedure that will improve things, then let's go through with it. But if the doctor later discovers that this will in fact make things WORSE, then he or she has an obligation to present this information to me and ask me again. That's their frigging job for crying out loud. Of course the quitters were all preparing a referendum 2.0 even before the result was known, but now they're $h!t scared the result of a second referendum will go against them because all their lies have been unmasked and won't work the next time around. Oh the hypocrisy... |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12085971)
And the UK doesn't?
EU: 1 nation, 1 vote. UK: England should be able to force brexit even if everyone in Scotland, NI and Wales voted remain simply because England is BIGGER. Surely you can see the difference, right? :unsure: Are you perhaps confusing the UK constitutional model with Belgium's? We had a referendum and everybody who could be bothered to vote voted - this concept was invented by Greek philosophers and is called democracy. Just because you don't like the result doesn't mean you can unilaterally redesign the constitutional model to get the result you want. The UK voted to leave - if Scotland wants to separate in due course it can and it can then decide to join the EU once it becomes a nation state in it's own right. Slow me down if I'm moving too quickly for you........ |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
(Post 12085175)
Sturgeon's constant posturing and bluffing, whilst irritating, is entirely understandable from a party political stand point.
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
(Post 12085175)
I did not vote in the BREXIT/BREMAIN debate as both sides were clearly lying through their teeth and I could not vote for either Project FEAR or Project XENOPHOBIA as I wanted them both to lose.......
|
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12085984)
I don't think it's even fair to compare the two as you're making it appear that both sides were dispersing lies equally, which was definitely not the case. One side played on the lowest of emotions and instilled hate in people, at the same time promising them la-la-land the riches beyond belief. The other simply focused on the bleak outlook of such a decision and what consequences it entails. If you want to jump off a roof and someone tells you that you are likely to break some bones, possibly end up an invalid, and it will definitely be a big mistake and it will HURT... is that lying and worthy of labeling it 'project fear'? Or maybe we ought to replace the word "fear" simply with "reality?"
|
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
(Post 12085979)
Astera, Astera, Astera, you do realize that the UK is a nation state not a federation of 4 countries don't you?
Are you perhaps confusing the UK constitutional model with Belgium's? Are you saying Scotland's vote should count less than England's or that England's vote should be more important than the rest of the UK combined simply because it's more populous? Not exactly very united or very democratic even... If you want to look at the legal side only then we can always revert to the referendum being non-binding in a legal sense - but I take it that doesn't suit your agenda. The government doesn't HAVE to make a decision according to the referendum. It CAN take it into account, but it doesn't need to. Are you confusing both terms perhaps? Because if a referendum was supposed to be legally-binding then it would have been construed that way. Let me ask you ONE question: should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences? P.S. On a side note, whereas all Belgium would be supporting their team, Wales were celebrating beyond belief when England got knocked out by footballing superpower Iceland at the Euros. So yeah... nation state... but still very separate indeed. :) |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Scotland was a country that was occupied by force, not very democratic.
|
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12086003)
Scotland is a country that is part of the UK, even if the UK is treated as a sovereign entity/state. Heck, it even has its own football team (unlike Belgium :) ) - though admittedly not as good as the UK's finest by a lightyear: Wales. :cool:
Are you saying Scotland's vote should count less than England's or that England's vote should be more important than the rest of the UK combined simply because it's more populous? Not exactly very united or very democratic even... If you want to look at the legal side only then we can always revert to the referendum being non-binding in a legal sense - but I take it that doesn't suit your agenda. The government doesn't HAVE to make a decision according to the referendum. It CAN take it into account, but it doesn't need to. Are you confusing both terms perhaps? Because if a referendum was supposed to be legally-binding then it would have been construed that way. Let me ask you ONE question: should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences? P.S. On a side note, whereas all Belgium would be supporting their team, Wales were celebrating beyond belief when England got knocked out by footballing superpower Iceland at the Euros. So yeah... nation state... but still very separate indeed. :) Football is actually the tiniest bit different from the constitutional bit we were debating and that's a bit of a rabbit hole. What agenda am I supposed to have? One of us is confused for sure and it may be the one who thinks only 4 of the 45 million voters get a vote in the referendum...... |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
(Post 12086044)
One of us is confused for sure and it may be the one who thinks only 4 of the 45 million voters get a vote in the referendum......
1. Should Scotland's vote should count less than England's or that England's vote should be more important than the rest of the UK combined simply because it's more populous? In other words, if all of England votes a certain way then that automatically has to happen (even if all of Scotland/Wales/NI disagree) and that's the way it should be? 2. Should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences? |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12086080)
You seem to be deflecting the issue and steering clear of anything inconvenient to you. So without further ado:
1. Should Scotland's vote should count less than England's or that England's vote should be more important than the rest of the UK combined simply because it's more populous? In other words, if all of England votes a certain way then that automatically has to happen (even if all of Scotland/Wales/NI disagree) and that's the way it should be? 2. Should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences? Your 2nd question is hypothetical and if it becomes a real situation I would judge it on its merits at the time but it is hypothetical... |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12086003)
Let me ask you ONE question: should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences?
|
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by paulry
(Post 12086093)
That would be reasonable only if it is clear that people voted "Leave" in order to secure a better financial future. But we all know they didn't. They voted for home rule and the ability to control all immigration.
|
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
As I suspected you're simply skating around the issue and offering non-answers.
I provided a very simple question: whether any vote in the UK should allow England to have a deciding share of votes over everyone else simply because it is BIGGER. So if all of England decides on something then the rest of the votes in the UK become irrelevant under this system. So just provide an answer, plain and simple: is this how democracy should work in the UK? That if all of England votes a certain way then all votes in Scotland/Wales/NI are then meaningless? As for #2, once again it was the simplest of questions: should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences? Don't deflect the issue with yet another meaningless non-response (like ooooh... I'll think about it if it happens) but just give a plain and simple answer. |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12086099)
As I suspected you're simply skating around the issue and offering non-answers.
I provided a very simple question: whether any vote in the UK should allow England to have a deciding share of votes over everyone else simply because it is BIGGER. So if all of England decides on something then the rest of the votes in the UK become irrelevant under this system. So just provide an answer, plain and simple: is this how democracy should work in the UK? That if all of England votes a certain way then all votes in Scotland/Wales/NI are then meaningless? As for #2, once again it was the simplest of questions: should the gov't enact a second referendum if Teresa May and her government are presented with (current) information that leaving the EU will have negative economic consequences? Don't deflect the issue with yet another meaningless non-response (like ooooh... I'll think about it if it happens) but just give a plain and simple answer. question 2 is hypothetical can you provide some detail of your new evidence to inform my deliberations - I can't just guess based on the information you have not provided. Simples really |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by paulry
(Post 12086093)
That would be reasonable only if it is clear that people voted "Leave" in order to secure a better financial future. But we all know they didn't. They voted for home rule and the ability to control all immigration.
Immigration was just a handy subject, like a side-dish to accompany economic prosperity. Like a win-win situation for the sheep to believe in. The UK already controls most immigration which still comes in from outside the EU year in, year out. And EU immigration happens to be the most beneficial to the country, so it's not exactly a logical area to focus on. Which brings up the notion that brexit was a complete load of bull. Zero logic, all bs... |
Re: Did the UK do the right thing in voting to leave the E.U.
Originally Posted by astera
(Post 12086110)
They were all promised greater prosperity, golden times ahead, and great money to be freed and spent on the NHS for instance. N
Immigration was just a handy subject, like a side-dish to accompany economic prosperity. Like a win-win situation for the sheep to believe in. Lots of lies from both sides though surely you don't agree that one side told only lies and the other only the truth? That's EMIR logic and you must be smarter than him? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:52 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.