Nanny State - US v UK
#226
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
I went to an extremely boring dinner party once where a number of doctors were complaining their heads off about how tough their lives were - one has a home in France which he went to for a long weekend every fortnight, so we said, "why don't you move to France?" Oh no, that's no good, the doctors only get paid half of their British equivalents. (This guy also only did 2 clinics a week, spending the rest of the time on "research".
Ok, so its hardly a representative sample, but good enough for me.
#230
Account Closed
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 700
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
but in his case, he was able to get his own insurance once he entered the work force. Guess thats why I asked about your son, and your worries about his future insurance.
#231
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
not everyone is lucky enough to either find a proper job straight out of gradution, or if they do, have a place that offers medical to new hires straight off the bat, which often puts you out hippa protection when you do get new medical insurance.
#232
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
Asthma is a condition that many children outgrow completely and for those who do not, often lessens in severity in adulthood. Every chronic condition has its own unique pattern of typical age of onset and typical course(s) of the illness over a lifetime.
#233
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
Thats not completely true it all depends on the triggers for attacks, the place you live all sorts can increase/decrease the severity age doesn't for a chronic asthmatic
#234
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
And some of the factors that trigger attacks can be avoided -- eg allergens, cold air (yes, this induces asthma in me), moving away from pollution if possible. I'm not trying to make light of asthma -- it's horrid and it can kill -- but from an insurer's perspective it isn't going to be nearly as expensive as say, diabetes -- and no one grows out of Type I diabetes.
#235
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
What's the situation with genetic conditions ... can they sting you on family history?
I presume group cover wouldn't matter, but what about individual policies?
I presume group cover wouldn't matter, but what about individual policies?
#237
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 351
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
dont mention it. just tell them you hve no family history of any illnesses nor do you smoke and drink. please tell me you didnt tell them about previous family problems?
#239
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 351
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
i actually told "them" that i have an occasional drink. my wife gave me an earful down the phone! people do not ever tell these insurance people about any health issues that they can not ever possibly know about. they are not your friends they are there to weed sick/unhealthy people/distant relatives out.
#240
Re: Nanny State - US v UK
And, not necessarily easy to pull off .. Oh, I dont know what my parents/brothers/sisters died of. Unless of course you really dont.
Oh, and I don't have to, I don't live in the US.