![]() |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 11846895)
I don't find the word terribly pleasing myself, but I was told by someone that it is actually grammatically correct ...
It doesn't make sense though, in the way it's applied. They'd call a meal 'healthful' for example, when it isn't really full of health. It's healty, thus making the person who eats it 'full of health'. That being said, I don't hear that one as much as I hear irregardless, so it flies below the radar. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847532)
That's another Mirriam Webster word ;)
Usage: That is "Healthful" Definition: Punch me in the throat for trying to be clever with made up words. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Nutek
(Post 11847544)
Word: "Healthful"
Usage: That is "Healthful" Definition: Punch me in the throat for trying to be clever with made up words. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847532)
..... It doesn't make sense though, in the way it's applied. They'd call a meal 'healthful' for example, when it isn't really full of health. It's healty, thus making the person who eats it 'full of health'.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11847550)
FIFY :scarper:
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847555)
Very funny.
:frown: |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847532)
That's another Mirriam Webster word ;)
It doesn't make sense though, in the way it's applied. They'd call a meal 'healthful' for example, when it isn't really full of health. It's healty, thus making the person who eats it 'full of health'. That being said, I don't hear that one as much as I hear irregardless, so it flies below the radar. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847555)
Very funny.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11847587)
You know healthful has been around for centuries right?
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11847587)
You know healthful has been around for centuries right?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847613)
That doesn't make it any less stupid of a word, though.
I was told yesterday I had nice pants on, but I let it pass. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 11847659)
It probably wasn't stupid in its time, but the issue is making (or reinstating) a word where a fully-functioning one is already established, for no particular reason. The leads to ambiguity. Similarly, using only one variant where both have specific meanings, eg program and programme. "Alien" is another example: it was perfectly correct and unambiguous when it used to be displayed at airports in place of "foreigner", but the dumbing-down of the language by, largely, Americans forced a change. It's the cult of dumb-down and make unnecessary change rather than educate and retain what is clear.
.... Regarding Programme/Program; surely, it's a matter of UK vs US spelling, plain and simple. Here in the US, 'program' is used exclusively, and in UK, 'programme' is used exclusively, at least in my experience. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 11847659)
I was told yesterday I had nice pants on, but I let it pass.
|
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11847613)
That doesn't make it any less stupid of a word, though.
Usage: People using words like "healthful" are completely shitful. |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Nutek
(Post 11847998)
How about shitful?
Usage: People using words like "healthful" are completely shitful. /respectful :sneaky: |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11848000)
Where's the "/helpful" sign-off that you often add to your posts?
/respectful :sneaky: |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:28 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.