![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12837786)
You guys seem to be making this much more difficult than it really is. It seems obvious to me. More democrats voted for Biden in the primaries than voted for Sanders, and by a fairly decent margin. That's why Biden was the choice.
Now ... why is that? I think there's two fairly obvious reasons. 1) The democrats are not ready for the brand of 'socialism' (or call it what you like, doesn't matter) that Sanders was pushing - medicare for all, free education, etc etc. I mean - he made it real clear what he was pushing for, and they didn't vote for him, so it's hard to argue that one. 2) They might be willing to accept the path Sanders was proposing, but they felt that strategically, it was better to vote for Biden because they felt that Sanders would get creamed by Trump and the Republicans in the general. Regarding #2, yes, current polls show Sanders beating Trump but ... Trump has not yet turned up his big war machine to try to discredit his opponent. It won't take much talk of higher taxes, government takeover, government waste, government ... blah blah blah to scare a whole bunch of independents away from Sanders. Biden, being more moderate, is less of a target here. I voted for Biden in the primary mainly due to #2. In the event Biden steps down, presumably Bernie will be the Dem candidate, unless the DNC pull some one else out of the hat. I personally think Bernie could handle Trump much better than Biden could. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12838006)
Coronavirus: At least two NHS hospitals trialling anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine hailed by Trumphttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/h...-a9461671.htmlThis amused me, especially as it was in the Indy where TDS is supreme. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news...ovid-19-begins |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12838006)
Coronavirus: At least two NHS hospitals trialling anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine hailed by Trumphttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/h...-a9461671.htmlThis amused me, especially as it was in the Indy where TDS is supreme. I don't think they are doing in hospital here in Vancouver, but one of the long term care homes they were testing this drug on patients who consented to trying it as part of a larger world trial. Haven't heard much since though, so no idea if they had any success with it. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12835528)
A lot is said about the popular vote but I think it is over-estimated. Both sides understand the ways of the electoral college and thus, campaign appropriately. I doubt Trump spent a penny campaigning in CA or NY for example, because he knew he wouldn't win those populous states, and as a result, he probably got fewer votes in those states than he would have had he (wasted his time and money) campaigned there. Similarly, No democrat is going to spend money campaigning in Utah. Further - if you are a Republican voter in CA or NY, you may very well not bother to vote because you know your vote isn't going to 'mean anything'. So placing a lot of emphasis on who won the 'popular vote' is simply wrong. IF the popular vote were to matter, campaigns would be run differently.
It was strange in moving the primary back to March we actually had TV ads. Not that it helped Michael Bloomberg. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12838006)
Coronavirus: At least two NHS hospitals trialling anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine hailed by Trumphttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/h...-a9461671.htmlThis amused me, especially as it was in the Indy where TDS is supreme. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12838254)
And this is in the 2020 Election thread because ... ?
If you ask me, it is deeply unfortunate that medical treatments have become politicized. You'd think it would be obvious to everyone that scientific data should lead the way. |
Re: 2020 Election
The Biden vs Trump debates should be fun. :lol:
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by johnwoo
(Post 12838186)
If Biden is forced to step down over sexual assault accusations, all of the above is purely academic, and personal opinion anyway.
In the event Biden steps down, presumably Bernie will be the Dem candidate, unless the DNC pull some one else out of the hat. I personally think Bernie could handle Trump much better than Biden could.
Originally Posted by HDWill
(Post 12838256)
Well, since Trump championed hydroxychloroquine based on his "gut," if it turned out to be highly effective, it would be a real feather in his cap for the election.
If you ask me, it is deeply unfortunate that medical treatments have become politicized. You'd think it would be obvious to everyone that scientific data should lead the way. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 12836783)
Sanders has evidently decided that a senile Biden is better than Trump. I don’t think the electorate will be agreeing with him.
Too bad Bernie didn't win, that whole scary socialist thing would have been a lot easier to sell, huh? But, wait a minute, aren't you the one that said Trump was guaranteed to win UNLESS there was a financial crisis? Now we have a financial crisis and you're saying we have to keep Trump because Biden is senile? How convenient. Convenient and very familiar sounding. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...-senile-124797 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020...can-party-line |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12838274)
Considering the fact that everybody has been talking about the severity of Trump's dementia for the past three years (I don't remember you mentioning that but maybe I missed it) it sounds like "the electorate" will have to judge which one is more senile.
Too bad Bernie didn't win, that whole scary socialist thing would have been a lot easier to sell, huh? But, wait a minute, aren't you the one that said Trump was guaranteed to win UNLESS there was a financial crisis? Now we have a financial crisis and you're saying we have to keep Trump because Biden is senile? How convenient. Convenient and very familiar sounding. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...-senile-124797 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020...can-party-line |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by johnwoo
(Post 12838186)
In the event Biden steps down, presumably Bernie will be the Dem candidate, unless the DNC pull some one else out of the hat.
The delegates themselves, and the party at large, are highly unlikely to coalesce around Sanders. The most likely scenarios would be, in this order: (1) Biden's VP pick becomes the nominee; (2) a brokered convention - which definitely does not benefit Sanders. I don't doubt in such a scenario that Sanders and his supporters will issue a bunch of demands and threats, and let them. He is the exemplar of the law of diminishing returns. |
Re: 2020 Election
The DNC must have a back up plan for a Biden drop out, whatever that reason could be. There is after all quite a few possible causes. If you were the VP pick would that not be something you would mention, do I get the nod?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Nominee has to be approved by the delegates. Nobody has the power at the DNC to just step in and say "Boiler, I choose you as the nominee." So, a VP pick can't be promised that. If it's after the convention, something akin to an emergency convention gets convened and operates kind of akin to how a brokered convention would function.
However, a VP pick is highly likely to be next-in-line for a lot of reasons, including continuity of the campaign, familiarity with the public, consistent messaging and platforms, the most obvious person for everyone to coalesce around, etc. Imagine for instance if you had a Biden-Klobuchar ticket that had been campaigning for months on a particular platform etc, and then suddenly at the end of September Biden has to withdraw and Sanders gets parachuted in with a completely different agenda. That's then highly confusing messaging and a highly dissonant platform for voters, so that's a problem. Also, the VP pick gets confirmed separately. If Biden withdraws, that doesn't mean his VP pick also withdraws (if this is after the convention). The VP pick has already been formally nominated. So that would mean whomever gets nominated in place, if not the VP, has to keep the VP pick. They don't get to bring in their own person as part of the deal. There is also the problem of the entire campaign machinery, where all the key staff etc have been hand-picked by the nominee. That all gets swept away and rebuilt from zero by Bernie (or whomever), on the fly, in September? Or he keeps staff he doesn't want and who don't want to work for him, and who all have different ideas of the platform? Whereas if the delegates just choose the VP pick instead it's a much easier transition. |
Re: 2020 Election
I was thinking more of what happened in 2016.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12838328)
I was thinking more of what happened in 2016.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:27 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.