![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Oh snap!
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778814)
My hero? When have I ever said that?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12778816)
Wait for it ... now comes the part where he says he's not a Trump supporter and he's completely neutral and unbiased. It's so cute when he does that.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12778826)
The fact that you twist yourself into a pretzel with this perverse defense of Trump's bullying of a teenager says it all. Regardless of any of her "issues", as you call them, and regardless of what Time Magazine may or may not have done .... your pip didn't give a squeak about Trump hate-tweeting her from the biggest megaphone on the planet. This is your pattern. I have to ask (again because I've said this to you before) what is it like to support somebody that you're embarrassed to admit you support? Good enough to **** but not good enough to marry?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778812)
From what her parents have said she has multiple issues, why focus on one?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778829)
You are the one who brought up Trump, I was commenting on the Time cover.
Go see your chiropractor you've twisted yourself into something unrecognizable. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 12778807)
https://fairfight.com/fair-fight-2020/ Fair Fight 2020. Stacey Abrams established this organisation, and they are involved in Wisconsin as well as other states. If you are going to give money in the 2020 election, this is a very deserving and effective organization to support. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778799)
I doubt anybody on here is qualified to discuss the medical implications, I wonder if anybody at Time looked into this.
I stand to be corrected if they did, currently it comes across as child abuse. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12778841)
I don't recall your posts pointing out Trump's "child abuse" towards her, including before this cover. Makes me "wonder" why that your opprobrium is so selective.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 12778843)
Certainly “begs the question†doesn’t it. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778795)
Begs the question what Time was doing putting a child with medical issues on their cover.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778804)
So it is an honour?
You might want to look at who else they have honoured. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 12778709)
One of which was bullying a 16 year old girl with Aspergers simply because she got Time's Person of the Year and no one on any side rebukes him. His wife's anti bullying program is going well.
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12778799)
...currently it comes across as child abuse.
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12778802)
Yeah because giving people honors is abuse. Do you realize how crazy you sound?
I suppose I should have known better. Un-bleeping-believable. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...6267a4bc1c.png |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12778740)
You are so right and there is no reason why as a country we can't restart the initiative of lifting people up with retraining. But we need leaders that have commanding communication skills like Obama that can get people united and enthused about citizenship and caring about a neighbor. That requires serious marketing ability and there are only a few candidates out there who can fit that role. Several of those companies you mentioned do have similar programs but their entry level requirements are much higher today and that barrier doesn't help to accomplish the desired goal of retraining out of work or under-skilled individuals. But right now we need to get through this election cycle successfully. Just like there was an Obama, Kennedy, Clinton and Reagan there will be other very charismatic leaders in the future who can start a movement.
It is what it is, can't really change how things are evolving. It's pretty much the same with disabled folks, the government rather disabled be it mental or physical to just collect a meager gov't disability payment rather than providing healthcare and supports folks need so they can be productive, lots of mentally ill are capable of working, the reason the unemployment rate for mentally ill is so high is few places will accommodate their needs, and limited supports people need. There is little public support for these sorts of programs for less fortunate/disabled etc and so politicians ignore it, it's not of enough importance to enough people to make politicians listen. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12778740)
You are so right and there is no reason why as a country we can't restart the initiative of lifting people up with retraining. But we need leaders that have commanding communication skills like Obama that can get people united and enthused about citizenship and caring about a neighbor. That requires serious marketing ability and there are only a few candidates out there who can fit that role. Several of those companies you mentioned do have similar programs but their entry level requirements are much higher today and that barrier doesn't help to accomplish the desired goal of retraining out of work or under-skilled individuals. But right now we need to get through this election cycle successfully. Just like there was an Obama, Kennedy, Clinton and Reagan there will be other very charismatic leaders in the future who can start a movement.
https://www.findcourses.co.uk/inspir...xplained-13914 One example: https://www.mercedes-benztraining.co...z-academy.aspx |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:26 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.