![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12779860)
It's hilarious as to how bad you are at this. You cite a poll where Mayo Pete, Liz Warren and your boy Bloomberg do terrible against Trump and then concern troll about Sanders. Desperate much? Let's not mention all the other polls where Sanders and Biden (and some others depending on the poll) beat Trump by a large margin.
BTW Sanders is the most popular candidate amongst minorities and beats Trump by the largest margin amongst women. But keep going with this desperate attempt that Sanders would be the worst candidate to face Trump, when there is no data to back it up. Again, my question is do you believe America is more progressive than the UK? Btw, , Sanders has had five years to win over Hispanic and African American and Asian voters yet Joe Biden is winning minority voters by 5 to 1 against Sanders. There is a reason for that. Biden has a long history with those groups that go back decades. Sanders can't catch up now that he wants something from those groups. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779893)
Not with standing me being bad at this, what ever that is, We need to look at what is real and ask questions that get to the heart of these elections. Is America a more liberal or Progressive (better boiler?) country than the UK? I think most Europeans and Americans would say no. In the UK they just rejected progressive change by giving the Conservative option candidate a landslide victory. If huge change by liberals(Corbyn offered everything including a free pony for each household) can't win over the voting public in a country that believe a nanny state is a positive concept, how are you going to convince pick-up truck driving good ole boys in America? If you selected the answer you can't, that would be correct. Far left policies will never be popular enough to win the White House and it's fool hearty to ignore the fact you need moderate voters in order to take back control of the White House there simply aren't enough liberal voters to out number Independent + Republican voters in a contest for power. To stick to your guns and act like moderate voters in America are actually closet Progressives is the same as putting your head in the sand like an ostrich. This election can be won by Democrats but Dogmatic can give Trump four more years in which he will cut social security, Medicaid and Medicare in order to pay for those permanent corporate tax breaks. So instead of gaining this new Healthcare system it is very possible to lose the safety net you already have in place. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Bernie Sanders voters then will get the blame for electing Trump not once but twice.
Again, my question is do you believe America is more progressive than the UK? |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779893)
Not with standing me being bad at this, what ever that is, We need to look at what is real and ask questions that get to the heart of these elections. Is America a more liberal or Progressive (better boiler?) country than the UK? I think most Europeans and Americans would say no. In the UK they just rejected progressive change by giving the Conservative option candidate a landslide victory. If huge change by liberals(Corbyn offered everything including a free pony for each household) can't win over the voting public in a country that believe a nanny state is a positive concept, how are you going to convince pick-up truck driving good ole boys in America? If you selected the answer you can't, that would be correct. Far left policies will never be popular enough to win the White House and it's fool hearty to ignore the fact you need moderate voters in order to take back control of the White House there simply aren't enough liberal voters to out number Independent + Republican voters in a contest for power. To stick to your guns and act like moderate voters in America are actually closet Progressives is the same as putting your head in the sand like an ostrich. This election can be won by Democrats but Dogmatic can give Trump four more years in which he will cut social security, Medicaid and Medicare in order to pay for those permanent corporate tax breaks. So instead of gaining this new Healthcare system it is very possible to lose the safety net you already have in place. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Bernie Sanders voters then will get the blame for electing Trump not once but twice.
Again, my question is do you believe America is more progressive than the UK? You bring up the UK election again, but don't address any of the reasons I already stated about how the comparison is stupid. Do you really think that Sanders' policies are as left wing or even further to the left as Corbyn's? Because that's what your implying. You talk about pickup driving good ole boys not supporting far left policies. Well 1) Sanders doesn't have far left policies. 2) You really think they are the only voting bloc in this country? 3) Have you actually fcking asked them if they would like healthcare and higher wages? The answer might surprise you. Your point about Sanders voters being responsible for electing Trump twice doesn't even make any sense. If they are responsible for Trump in 2020 by nominating him in the primary, then logically Clinton supporters would be responsible in 2016 for nominating her. Likewise if they are responsible for Trump in 2016 by not voting for Clinton (not true btw, but it's not like you actually care about facts), then it would be voters who didn't vote for Sanders in 2020 who were responsible. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12779900)
You started OK but Corbyn has never been a Liberal, even in his younger days. And then you lost it again by saying liberal when I think you meant Progressive.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779893)
Btw, , Sanders has had five years to win over Hispanic and African American and Asian voters yet Joe Biden is winning minority voters by 5 to 1 against Sanders. There is a reason for that. Biden has a long history with those groups that go back decades. Sanders can't catch up now that he wants something from those groups.
"Notably, though, Sanders is the candidate who narrowly leads with nonwhite voters, 29% to 26%, over Biden. This might be because of Sanders' strength with younger voters of color and Latinos. But the margins of error with these subgroups are too high to draw any definitive conclusions." https://www.npr.org/2019/12/16/78823...emocratic-race |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12779918)
Stop fking lying!!!!
"Notably, though, Sanders is the candidate who narrowly leads with nonwhite voters, 29% to 26%, over Biden. This might be because of Sanders' strength with younger voters of color and Latinos. But the margins of error with these subgroups are too high to draw any definitive conclusions." https://www.npr.org/2019/12/16/78823...emocratic-race Do you believe America is more progressive than the UK? Nearly two million African American voters stayed at home in the 2016 election that came out in 2012. If Democrats can motivate those voters in PA. Michigan and Wisconsin then Trump can't win. But to date all I hear is Biden's name with those minority voters. Sanders' name is not popular. And offering free stuff doesn't always work. Just ask Corbyn. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779948)
Do you really believe there are more youth minority voters than minority older over-all?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...s-baby-boomers And because Sanders is overwhelmingly popular with younger voters, he would inspire even more to vote
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779948)
What can we draw from this one poll of Sanders garnering more support among minority groups? Probably nothing because it's the first poll to give Sanders an edge with those voters. But lets see if a one time poll can become a trend.
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779948)
You still didn't respond to my question.
Do you believe America is more progressive than the UK?
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12779948)
Nearly two million African American voters stayed at home in the 2016 election that came out in 2012. If Democrats can motivate those voters in PA. Michigan and Wisconsin then Trump can't win. But to date all I hear is Biden's name with those minority voters. Sanders' name is not popular.
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/7/1821689...2020-president |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12779912)
Oh for pity's sake. Why do just keep repeating the same nonsense over and over again? You never address or refute any the points I make.
. Because he's a passive/aggressive annoyance algorithm? (I stole that from somebody else but it was too good to leave fallow) |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12779956)
I don't have to believe anything, I can just look at the numbers.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...s-baby-boomers It's not a relevant question. Unless you really believe that Sanders is more progressive than Corbyn. Really, then you obviously haven't been listening to many minority voters as Sanders has the most diverse coalition of supporters. https://www.vox.com/2019/3/7/1821689...2020-president |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12779979)
Because he's a passive/aggressive annoyance algorithm?
(I stole that from somebody else but it was too good to leave fallow) |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12780030)
Asking if America is a more progressive country compared to the UK is a very valid question if your dream of turning America's healthcare system into a similar system to that in Europe. Especially since socialism is dying a quick death in the UK and the last election makes that point quite well.
Second, how would implementing universal healthcare make the US *more* progressive than the UK or the rest of Europe? Third, you say socialism is dying in the UK, but try taking away the NHS and see how that goes.
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12780030)
But let us not get ahead of our selves. First we must get past Super Tuesday to know who exactly has the advantage. Right now Biden is far out in front because of his support with older voters and the minority voters. I believe Biden is currently up in the first real test where minority voters are a true reflection in the Democrat party. Biden in South Carolina is up 28% to Sanders 19%. Let's see how this all pans out. But one thing is for sure, Trump believe Biden is his biggest threat which explains why he attempted to use Ukraine to steal the 2020 election by manufacturing fake dirt on Biden. Trump doesn't seem concerned about Sanders. I wonder why.
Biden's main argument is that he is the one who can beat Trump, but if comes in third in IA and NH, then that argument could take a big hit and affect his polling elsewhere. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12780031)
That is still better than being an angry masochistic personality with sadistic leanings. But to each his or her own disorder. And I didn't need to steal my observation from anyone. I just read you like a book. Check Mate!
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12780041)
Tell us again how rich you are. That always makes you happy.
|
Re: 2020 Election
You can be rich in other ways than financial.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by UkWinds5353
(Post 12780074)
Not sure who this post could be referring to because not one time have I commented that I am financially rich. Please always be truthful when mentioning my postings. Using embellishments to argue your view point is a cheap tactic and beneath a person that can do better.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:28 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.