![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11718057)
The thing is I'm never quite sure if the right wing actually believe the nonsense the spout.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11718061)
These same people invariably can't figure out that George Orwell was a socialist. Their Google must be broken.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11717770)
I'm sort of with you on that. I'd get rid of MSNBC and a bunch of other stations I never watch, in exchange for discounted HBO and Game of Thrones. But that won't happen with DirecTV.
I like FNC because they have the blondest news anchorettes with the greatest legs and shortest skirts in the news business. Best eye candy on the air. Also, Megyn Kelly is without question the smartest female interviewer on any of the news channels - even though she's also blonde with great legs. She doesn't ask stupid questions like that ditz who was the only one who interviewed Hillary, and who used that opportunity to breathlessly ask her to tell the world her favorite flavour of ice cream. In Scottsdale, they have this 'Barbie Doll' lookalike anchor who looks so 'fake' that I can't take anything she says seriously ... Stephanie Hockridge Stephanie Hockridge - ABC15 Arizona . She's a shoe-in for Fox News at some point in the future ... |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11717833)
Yes, the Fox News anchor who goes out of her way to argue that Jesus was a white guy is a real genius.
I further understand that the caucasoid peoples can range from blonde, blue-eyed, pale-skinned surfer-dudes in Scandinavia, to olive-skinned Mediterraneans, to very dark-skinned people in southern Egypt and points south and east, back to pale-faces in Iran. Of course the answer to that question - if they are - doesn't tell us what colour Jesus' skin was, and neither does any book in the New Testament. Megyn was careless, forgot to be PC for a moment, and, I understand, was trying to reassure kids (whose parents were presumably all Fox News viewers) about that mythical figure Santa; and somehow He got dragged into the discussion by her. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11718125)
I'm not taking a side here, but do have an anthropological question: if anyone knows, are semitic peoples currently considered part of the caucasoid branch of the human race by anthropologists? I understand that in the 19th century they classified humans as belonging to the caucasoid, negroid and mongoloid branches, with a possible fourth being australoid.
Either way, Jesus (if he even existed, which is doubtful as it is) may have been 'caucasoid' and he almost certainly wouldn't have been black, not even the Egyptians were, but he certainly would be a lot more swarthy than the pale, Italian looking bloke who is normally depicted in religious art. He, if he was around now, would probably be able to get a decent gig playing bad guys in 24 or Homeland type shows. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 11718090)
Brianna Keilar [url=http://www.cnn.com/profiles/brianna-keilar-profile]But by far the best 'serious' anchor is Christiane Amanpour CNN Profiles - Christiane Amanpour - Anchor and Chief International Correspondent - CNN.com ... she and Fareed Zakaria are the two I always sit up and listen to.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11718138)
Agreed. I've followed Christiane since the first Gulf War. I think Fox's stable of blonde, leggy, fit-looking Aryan-type girls is essential to their brand and probably the result of some sort of GMO experiment. It spells success.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11718141)
I'm not sure it does. Given Fox News' audience consists mainly of men over the age of 70, don't they run the risk of killing them all off by getting their hearts racing too much. Plus the fact that old people use most of the healthcare in this country, killing them off will reduce healthcare costs and make it look like Obamacare is working. A double whammy.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 11718068)
The "commentator" types on tv generally don't, Glenn Beck has pretty much admitted it. They know there is a market for what they say and they are happy to make a pretty penny from it while it gives an advantage to their political side. Bill O'Reilly calmed down remarkably when the Republicans started screwing up the economy - it may have been coincidence but I suspect that he couldn't wholehearted support them when he knew they were making it all go wrong.
I was looking at a Forbes list of the, as we say in America, earningest, celebrities. Limbaugh, Hannity make quite a lot of money out of peddling their hate, better than being a preacher. And so many of them move from entertainment to pseudo-politics. #11 Rush Limbaugh $79 M #89 Sean Hannity $29 M The World's Highest-Paid Celebrities List - Forbes |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11718141)
I'm not sure it does. Given Fox News' audience consists mainly of men over the age of 70, don't they run the risk of killing them all off by getting their hearts racing too much. Plus the fact that old people use most of the healthcare in this country, killing them off will reduce healthcare costs and make it look like Obamacare is working. A double whammy.
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 11718159)
A veritable "Fox News Death Panel"...
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 11718068)
The "commentator" types on tv generally don't, Glenn Beck has pretty much admitted it. They know there is a market for what they say and they are happy to make a pretty penny from it while it gives an advantage to their political side.
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11718164)
Any links to Beck admitting it?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11718125)
Megyn was careless, forgot to be PC for a moment, and, I understand, was trying to reassure WHITE kids (whose parents were presumably all Fox News viewers) about that mythical figure Santa; and somehow He got dragged into the discussion by her. No need to care about the kids who aren't white, as their concerns aren't relevant.
|
Re: 2016 Election
How to watch debate without cable? Any one got a dodgy link?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 11718217)
How to watch debate without cable? Any one got a dodgy link?
http://www.livenewschat.eu/the-repub...s-live-stream/ |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11718241)
I think they made a big mistake by not having relegation/promotion in these debates. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:57 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.