![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Reports are that Perry has run out of cash already and can't pay his staff.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11721447)
Reports are that Perry has run out of cash already and can't pay his staff.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Like any reasonable person, my top three were Democrats - but surprised to see a 60% for Huckabee! I must have really hit the nail on a couple of topics for him. I really don't like him though, sleazy politician. I think it's the first time that a survey like this has put a Republican above 50% for me. Must be going senile.
I wonder how the "Yes, but..." votes are tabulated compared to the plain "Yes". Some of them started with "Yes, but..." and ended up sounding far more like "No, although..." and vice versa. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11721352)
Anyway, it looks like if the people of BE were the only ones who got to vote for President, then we would be feeling the Bern.
|
Re: 2016 Election
I'm surprised that Teflon Don's lead in the polls is still increasing. I thought he'd blown it during last week's debate. Perhaps people are sick and tired of the old way of politics and want someone who says what they think...not say what people want to hear. He's certainly spiced things up.:blink::unsure:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11721517)
Just what I've been thinking. Does she feel the heat? How's it gonna influence her policy positions?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11721538)
I'm surprised that Teflon Don's lead in the polls is still increasing. I thought he'd blown it during last week's debate. Perhaps people are sick and tired of the old way of politics and want someone who says what they think...not say what people want to hear. He's certainly spiced things up.:blink::unsure:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11721447)
Reports are that Perry has run out of cash already and can't pay his staff.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11721538)
I'm surprised that Teflon Don's lead in the polls is still increasing. Perhaps people are sick and tired of the old way of politics and want someone who says what they think...not say what people want to hear.:blink::unsure:
He doesn't say what he thinks - because he doesn't think: Mr. Trump strikes me as an entirely un-thoughtful, reactive individual, temperamentally incapable of reflection. He spouts, rarely listens - or if he does- only hears praise (often non-existent or else ego gratifying Facebook affirmation). Or imagined slights if deserved criticism is offered. So to those who seek a "tell it like it is" candidate who expresses his thoughts about matters of policy - they would be sorely disappointed if (:eek:) he ever were to govern. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11721542)
When Bernie Sanders drops out and supports Clinton, that will be a help to her and the Democratic party.
.....so, having learned yesterday, after taking the terrific quiz Leslie posted here (see above), that Bernie reflects my position on issues substantially more than Hillary (well...5% more) I took note when I just heard that 25,000 attended his rally last night at the LA Sports Arena. Amazing. Wish I'd been there to hear him speak. Can't help but smile when thinking about who the 2 crowd-grabbers are right now in the 2 parties. I want to hear Trump label Bernie..... "A LOSER....A TOTAL LOSER...I'M TELLING YOU HE'S A LOSER" (btw.....anyone else notice how he seems prone to ad-hominem insult in triplicate)? |
Re: 2016 Election
Poor Jim Gilmore... like the fat kid who doesn't get picked for sports.
CNN invites all but one Republican presidential candidate to next debates | US news | The Guardian |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11721651)
Poor Jim Gilmore... like the fat kid who doesn't get picked for sports.
CNN invites all but one Republican presidential candidate to next debates | US news | The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...es-politically so....what's your position on "book-burning" :eek::eek::eek: ? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11721593)
Regarding what I've put in bold (above)...
He doesn't say what he thinks - because he doesn't think: Mr. Trump strikes me as an entirely un-thoughtful, reactive individual, temperamentally incapable of reflection. He spouts, rarely listens - or if he does- only hears praise (often non-existent or else ego gratifying Facebook affirmation). Or imagined slights if deserved criticism is offered. So to those who seek a "tell it like it is" candidate who expresses his thoughts about matters of policy - they would be sorely disappointed if (:eek:) he ever were to govern. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 11721581)
"Oops".
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11721662)
Gilmore...Giless....was gonna comment....when my eye caught a headline link on the Guardian page, which then revealed this :blink: truly terrifying news......
Scott Walker wants to fire academics with whom he disagrees politically | Michael Mann and Randi Weingarten | Comment is free | The Guardian so....what's your position on "book-burning" :eek::eek::eek: ? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:07 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.