![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11718907)
Megyn Kelly could ask the candidates whether Jesus was white.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11718907)
Megyn Kelly could ask the candidates whether Jesus was white.
Though, ironically, the depictions of Yeshua (a semitic Palestinean, still technically caucasian, but definitely not 'white') as a bit of a pasty Gabriel Batistuta are probably closer to what your average Jesús on the street might look like. Are we all suitably confused yet? Good. |
Re: 2016 Election
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11718908)
Got anything else on her?
GOP Debate Moderator Megyn Kelly Has Long History Of Offensive, Out-Of-Touch Comments About Minorities | Research | Media Matters for America Of course, one must remember that you thought it was insightful to refer to Bernie Sanders as a Nazi. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11718976)
Apparently, she thinks that Ann Coulter is some sort of authority on immigration:
GOP Debate Moderator Megyn Kelly Has Long History Of Offensive, Out-Of-Touch Comments About Minorities | Research | Media Matters for America Of course, one must remember that you thought it was insightful to refer to Bernie Sanders as a Nazi. |
Re: 2016 Election
So apparently wife-rapist Donald Trump has decided it's a good idea to talk about Megyn Kelly's period. :blink:
Does he actually think she wrote her own questions? Or that they, at the very least, weren't vetted through the Fox higher ups? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11719315)
So apparently wife-rapist Donald Trump has decided it's a good idea to talk about Megyn Kelly's period. :blink:
Does he actually think she wrote her own questions? Or that they, at the very least, weren't vetted through the Fox higher ups? I do believe the questions were the result of intensive discussion amongst the moderators, the researchers and a review by higher-ups. The moderators then decided who would ask what, and Kelly was designated to ask the questions about Trump's prior misogynistic comments. Of course, if she hadn't asked him, someone else - Rachel Maddow or equivalent - would have grilled him on them at a later date. I see this egomaniac as poison for the Party if he's nominated (in 2010 we lost Senate seats for less), and poison if he isn't, when he runs his vengeful 3rd party campaign. |
Re: 2016 Election
Megyn Kelly doesn't understand voting, either.
The lack of basic research skills must be an indication of that magical genius at work. |
Re: 2016 Election
Spoiler:
|
Re: 2016 Election
For me - big surprise of the Fox Presidential Debate was the penetrating nature of the questions from the 3 moderators.
Have never before watched Fox News. The incisiveness was quite unexpected. OTOH - Fact that in so many instances the candidates chose to skirt/ignore what was being asked and pivot, instead, to a non-sequitor reply - was predictably true-to-form. Donald Trump's continued ascendency has begun to scare me: "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" cartoon above encapsulates it |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11719452)
OTOH - Fact that in so many instances the candidates chose to skirt/ignore what was being asked and pivot, instead, to a non-sequitor reply - was predictably true-to-form. cartoon above encapsulates it *holds finger up and purses lips* They were all so rehearsed. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11719452)
For me - big surprise of the Fox Presidential Debate was the penetrating nature of the questions from the 3 moderators.
Have never before watched Fox News. The incisiveness was quite unexpected. I enjoyed the Fox debate. The 2 hours flew by! I have sometimes dozed off through parts of previous debates, but I had no problem staying awake (and laughing out loud) for this one.... :) |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by WEBlue
(Post 11719591)
I vehemently dislike Fox (Faux) News, but I have been watching Megyn Kelly in recent months. It's not that I like her particularly (her politics stink) but she does ask the tough questions, and never panders...and I do like that.
I detest the comments that have been made purely because of her gender, her age or the the color of her hair. Totally irrelevant. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by WEBlue
(Post 11719591)
I enjoyed the Fox debate. I had no problem staying awake (and laughing out loud) for this one.... :)
Theatre of the Absurd: 1st post debate poll results - from NBC - just in....... Which of the 10 big boys "won" their debate-that-wasn't? None of them! .......The "winner" was..... Carly Fiorina :nod::nod::nod: (She who wasn't even there) Theatre of the Absurder: Despite all - Trump continues to maintain his lead over the pack :blink: Fiorina the Fierce has poll-vaulted from Nowheresville to #4 ps: http://www.pdf.investintech.com/prev...986/index.html This link is less down-in-the weedsy....http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-pres...l-lead-n406766 |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 11720092)
Keep laughing and welcome to the.....
Theatre of the Absurd: Fiorina the Fierce has poll-vaulted from Nowheresville to #4 [/url] A debate/cat fight between Fiorina the Fierce and The Hildebeest would be hugely entertaining, if nothing else. :nod: Could be like the Gypsy women fighting to the death in "From Russia With Love." Ticket scalpers to that event would make a fortune. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:17 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.