Re: 2016 Election
 

sigh

Re: 2016 Election
 

You orthodox super liberal you!

Re: 2016 Election
 

I honestly have no idea what just happened. :blink:

As long as Flavius doesn't do a flounce, I'm good. He's actually a complete blast to spar with.

Re: 2016 Election
 

If I heard the tease correctly, Hillary is going to be on the Rachel Maddow show in about 20 minutes. Is she going to actually start doing some real interviews?

Re: 2016 Election
 

Yeh, lol at Flavius' post over there... "they unload bile and call anyone who expresses a viewpoint different from the super-liberal orthodoxy that rules in the Park, an idiot, or worse."

http://britishexpats.com/forum/maple.../#post11776001

Re: 2016 Election
 

Whoopsie ... looks like I overestimated his ability to wear big boy pants. :rofl:

Re: 2016 Election
 

Getting her retaliation in first, perhaps?

Re: 2016 Election
 

If that's what she's doing ... good for her.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Okay, so Hillary is going to be on the Rachel Maddow show this Friday... not tonight. Sorry. :huh:

Re: 2016 Election
 

Thanks Leslie! I'm not outta here.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Jesus ...

Re: 2016 Election
 

Ooh you dragon!

Re: 2016 Election
 

So. I have no idea who that person is. :confused:

I do love it when all one can do is go after your post count ... while they themselves are actually posting. Hey ho, make love not war. The Canadian brain trust is rocking the internet.

Re: 2016 Election
 

I never understood that one. From either way - having a go at someone because they have posted a lot is pointless, just like having a go at someone who only has a couple of hundred posts. Go after the content of their argument, not peripherals.

I just don't get the butthurt, either. I'm observing from outside but all I saw was a disagreement. Makes no bloody sense.

Re: 2016 Election
 

Yeah, it's a made up drama. FWIW, I was the one who was attacked first. I was called lazy and then when I responded, I was called a lazy whiner. All this by somebody who was completely missing the point of my post and going down rabbit holes about people not wanting get ID ... which did not apply. Giantaxe pointed out some home truths and holes in his argument and got accused of triggering some sort of mental health episode. Then Smith goes on another forum and slags us off, claiming damages against us. Now over there in Canada, they're hurling insults about people who aren't bothering them in any way whatsoever. This is typical of people who pick fights over matters of which they are ill informed and then play the victim when they get their feet held to the fire. Whatever the "trigger" may have been ... he brought it in with him -- he didn't get it here.