|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 11182489)
Why would anyone be sympathetic and defend a religion that is so harsh to half of those born into it, unless they agree that women should be oppressed?
and why do you think that it makes you a better person by condoning their poison? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by IamStu
(Post 11182531)
My error...thought it was MeMe.
The biggest problem with this thread is people talking about different things. Some are talking about supression within the mulsim ranks whilst others, believing they´re in a conversation, are talking about equality within different muslim ranks. From what I see, MeMe is talking about group A, and Bipat and your goodself are talking about group B!!! ... no wonder it is what it is :blink: |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by me me
(Post 11182489)
Why would anyone be sympathetic and defend a religion that is so harsh to half of those born into it, unless they agree that women should be oppressed?
and why do you think that it makes you a better person by condoning their poison? |
Re: British standards ???
At last the voice of reason. !!
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 11182564)
I think you have a point. I'm no lover of Islam or any other religion and I freely admit that radical and extreme Islam is a real problem in more ways than one. If me me were to address her comments to Radical Islam and Muslim extremists instead of just to Islam and Muslims I suspect there would be considerably more agreement.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by IamStu
(Post 11182531)
My error...thought it was MeMe.
You have never won an election in your life; indeed, the Party’s share of the vote has fallen wherever you’ve stood. You are a Cameroon creation, elevated solely because you are female, Muslim and Asian. The ‘greasy pole’ was obligingly degreased especially for you: high-profile roles were created and ladders were made abundant while the snakes of political reality were de-fanged and un-venomed. All because you embody the Cameroon ‘modernisation’ strategy and ‘decontamination’ agenda. You are indeed a symbol – a ‘tokenistic appointment’ – as some of your co-religionists observe. |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by IamStu
(Post 11182488)
Are we reading the same posts?
As your reply was to MeMe, you do realise she fully supports Muslim woman in their plight for equal rights? What´s with your "victim" stance? Amazing how ones own thoughts are projected onto others! Further posts have made me think it not actually so far from the truth. So best not to mention any other Muslim women in public life:ohmy: What do you mean by "victim stance"? I am not a victim of anything except an 'addiction' to joining in lengthy discussions about Muslims, etc.:( |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by Bipat
(Post 11182588)
My remark about "A Muslim woman being put down on this Forum", was meant as a joke!!!
Further posts have made me think it not actually so far from the truth. So best not to mention any other Muslim women in public life:ohmy: What do you mean by "victim stance"? I am not a victim of anything except an 'addiction' to joining in lengthy discussions about Muslims, etc.:( |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by agoreira
(Post 11182582)
No, twas I! Someone said Warsi was unforgettable, I disagreed, I said I thought she was a political lightweight whose meteoric rise to the top was due in a large part to the fact she was Asian and a Muslim. Even after she was kicked out, they invented a new position for her. Someone more eloquent than me said this of her,
Whatever reason Sayeeda Warsi was originally chosen I admire her intelligence and sense. So there we can agree to disagree. She was "kicked out" because of a 'little expenses problem' (that makes her a real politician!!!!!!) PS Any Muslim women that you do admire?? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by IamStu
(Post 11182595)
Making cutting remarks in a "debate" of high feelings will seldom be seen as funny by the person the joke is directed at. But no doubt you would be fully aware of that hence your little jab poorly disguised as such.
I suppose the debate would only have really high feelings if a British expat of the Muslim religion joined in. Would they dare?? |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by agoreira
(Post 11182582)
No, twas I! Someone said Warsi was unforgettable, I disagreed, I said I thought she was a political lightweight whose meteoric rise to the top was due in a large part to the fact she was Asian and a Muslim. Even after she was kicked out, they invented a new position for her. Someone more eloquent than me said this of her,
and don't forget our own Baroness Warsi I dislike this sort of thing In November 2013, Lady Warsi, told an audience at the University of Cambridge, that Faith was being put back at the “heart of government,†as it was under Sir Winston Churchill and Baroness Thatcher. The Coalition she argued, is one of the “most pro-faith governments in the West,â€. “More often than not, people who do God do good. |
Re: British standards ???
Am I in la la land or what:blink: just been reading about this white woman, married to a non Muslim Indian who fanaticises about her close contacts with Muslim Indians.....tell it to the marines chuck:lol:
|
Re: British standards ???
With you 99% comment , you definetly are in La La land.
|
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by EMR
(Post 11182705)
With you 99% comment , you definetly are in La La land.
Is there anyway to put a whole thread on ignore, it is total tripe, flicking crap:thumbdown::thumbdown: |
Re: British standards ???
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 11182700)
Am I in la la land or what:blink: just been reading about this white woman, married to a non Muslim Indian who fanaticises about her close contacts with Muslim Indians.....tell it to the marines chuck:lol:
Why always this emphasis on "white"???? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:27 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.