![]() |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8540219)
So IainK - was Gerrard paid?:sneaky:
I wonder how many backpasses he makes over the course of a season? Im thinking its not that many...conspiracy theorists of the world unite... |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8541790)
No, (well, no more than his customary £100k+ a week anyway) but like every right thinking scouser he wont be weeping into his pillow about what was a shocker of a backpass.:D
I wonder how many backpasses he makes over the course of a season? Im thinking its not that many...conspiracy theorists of the world unite... Let's hope he has a better season next year! This year wasn't his best. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8541822)
Of course I wasn't suggesting there were any kickbacks for kick backs!:p
Let's hope he has a better season next year! This year wasn't his best. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
So is Rafa staying? There's conflicting reports.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8541923)
So is Rafa staying? There's conflicting reports.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8541923)
So is Rafa staying? There's conflicting reports.
With no funds from ownership he probably doesnt want to stay, but they cant afford to fire him. With new ownership and funds he would probably want to stay, but they would probably take the loss and bring a new man in... Right now I think he doesnt know! Id say with the amount the ownership want, hes staying, but only cos Juve cant afford to buy out his contract either... I have mixed feelings about the whole thing, there are probably not that many managers out there better tactically, but his buying record sucks, and we clearly need to buy! |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Juventus balk at €30m fee for Liverpool boss Benitez; Roberto Mancini linked
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8541987)
[snip]... but only cos Juve cant afford to buy out his contract either...
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
I wonder if having Rafa in place is seen as an asset in terms of attracting new ownership, or whether they would be more likely to attract a buyer without him.
A year ago he was (I think) clearly an asset, but his stock has fallen a long way over one poor season. Do managers have a "best by" date and expire? SAF would appear to be an exception to that idea, but then few others ever get the opportunity to be in place for a long time (Wenger and ?????). Liverpools glory years seem to coincide with managerial continuity... but is that chicken or egg I wonder. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8541749)
Oi - less of the "manure" - which references the deaths of players.
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8541790)
No, (well, no more than his customary £100k+ a week anyway) but like every right thinking scouser he wont be weeping into his pillow about what was a shocker of a backpass.:D
I wonder how many backpasses he makes over the course of a season? Im thinking its not that many...conspiracy theorists of the world unite... I was at Highbury when Gerrard gave the ball to Henry. Alledgedly, he's also done exactly the same for Henry in an England v France match. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8541749)
Oi - less of the "manure" - which references the deaths of players. :frown: If you want to be disrespectful join the forum of your own team and rant and rave there. But since this thread is for forum members who support all teams I would ask that insulting terms not be used.
Utter crap. Not all Man u, Manure remarks are Munich based, as you well know. You won't catch me ranting about football, as I don't believe My team has a god given right to win everything, so its a bonus when we can pick up a trophy.. Also If we fail to win at the weekend, I probably won't post sniveling comments about how nasty it is to label us Chel$ki. And the "comprehensively beaten" remark - did you watch the games - lots of very iffy reffing totally changed the results. Eg. Drogba's offside goal. Remark above is in regards to Drogba's offside, Before you resume whining. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
That was quite a title challenging season for Liverpool. I wonder how many of the decent players will abandon the sinking ship?
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8542806)
That was quite a title challenging season for Liverpool. I wonder how many of the decent players will abandon the sinking ship?
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 8542830)
Hopefully they will have exactly the same team next year
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8542837)
At least keep that tender hot foot Carragher in their defense. He was remarkable to watch this season, he actually looked like he was going backwards some times.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8542196)
Less of the Manure fans singing 'Arsene Wenger's a paedo', and other disgusting songs, and maybe other team's fans would stop singing about Munich.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8541749)
Oi - less of the "manure" - which references the deaths of players. :frown: If you want to be disrespectful join the forum of your own team and rant and rave there. But since this thread is for forum members who support all teams I would ask that insulting terms not be used.
And the "comprehensively beaten" remark - did you watch the games - lots of very iffy reffing totally changed the results. Eg. Drogba's offside goal. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
And Flogger: No whining here m8! Just a request for a less derogatory tone. The Manure remarks SPECIFICALLY reference back to Munich and the death of Duncan Edwards.
And er.. what is your team? |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 8542913)
Big loss to England since he retired from International football:rolleyes:
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8542981)
I don't sing them, and I don't repeat such remarks here. These are not the terraces. And I think they've been singing about Munich a lot longer than Wenger has been around!
I don't agree with any so-called fan from any team singing songs deriding Munich, Hillsborough, paedophilia or other tasteless subjects. Respect is something sadly lacking from the stands these days. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8543323)
I don't agree with any so-called fan from any team singing songs deriding Munich, Hillsborough, paedophilia or other tasteless subjects. Respect is something sadly lacking from the stands these days. What did that respect last exist? I used to go to Goodison & elsewhere in 70s & early 80s, admittedly on the terraces though. Plenty of tasteless stuff bouncing around then. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by expatasia
(Post 8543408)
What did that respect last exist?
I used to go to Goodison & elsewhere in 70s & early 80s, admittedly on the terraces though. Plenty of tasteless stuff bouncing around then. Goodison? One ground I've never been to, yet. One day maybe. :thumbup: |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8543514)
I think in those days it was tolerated more.
Goodison? One ground I've never been to, yet. One day maybe. :thumbup: I'll never ever go to any future super dooper groundshare bowl in the city! |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8542992)
And Flogger: No whining here m8! Just a request for a less derogatory tone. The Manure remarks SPECIFICALLY reference back to Munich and the death of Duncan Edwards.
And er.. what is your team? You might be taking it all a bit too seriously. I dont think anyone should be taking the piss out of Munich, Heysel, Hillsborough or any other footy related tragedy. Too many people take Shanklys infamous "more important than life or death" at face value. But there is nothing new about abusive and tasteless songs is there:) |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by expatasia
(Post 8543597)
Hurry. it's one of the few old style non-plasticky grounds still going in the top flight!
I'll never ever go to any future super dooper groundshare bowl in the city! I dont have any problem with a Liverpool groundshare, It works in Turin, It works in Rome, It makes a hell of a lot more sense than both teams spending £500+m on their own ground, you could have integrated public transport to a single ground, I just dont get why its so impossible for people to consider. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544076)
Its a long treck from Tokyo anyway;)
I dont have any problem with a Liverpool groundshare, It works in Turin, It works in Rome, It makes a hell of a lot more sense than both teams spending £500+m on their own ground, you could have integrated public transport to a single ground, I just dont get why its so impossible for people to consider. I can't explain why I'm so anti-groundshare, just doesn't feel right. Even from here. Football is not meant to be solely about $s. Go on, shoot me down. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
The real reason it wont fly is how would you decide on who gets what from the ground naming rights financial windfall;)
Liverpool would hold out for more than 50% as the more storied and world famous team, and Everton would never accept any less than 50:50 Plus where would they find a sponsor who would support both Blue and Red halfs of the city... incurring the never ending wrath of both! |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544155)
Plus where would they find a sponsor who would support both Blue and Red halfs of the city... incurring the never ending wrath of both!
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
The Liverpool Echo would do. Hang on, change that name!
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by expatasia
(Post 8544195)
The Liverpool Echo would do. Hang on, change that name!
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544220)
Or The Sun? Sure the Everton fans wouldnt care, but some of the Liverpool ones might have a problem with that!....
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544076)
I dont have any problem with a Liverpool groundshare, It works in Turin, It works in Rome, It makes a hell of a lot more sense than both teams spending £500+m on their own ground, you could have integrated public transport to a single ground, I just dont get why its so impossible for people to consider.
Getting back to footie, I think that either Torres or Benitez will go over the summer and that Gerrard may be tempted as well. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544220)
Or The Sun? Sure the Everton fans wouldnt care, but some of the Liverpool ones might have a problem with that!.... groundshare, bound to cut down sponsorship opportunities. I suppose it could have different names depending who the home team is on any given day...
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8544392)
The problem for Liverpool is the same one Leeds have faced. Unless its a flukey cup tie they'll never be able to fill the ground once they're in division one or two.
Newcastle did the same. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544076)
I dont have any problem with a Liverpool groundshare, It works in Turin, It works in Rome...I just dont get why its so impossible for people to consider.
Bristol Rovers had a temporary share with City. It wasn't liked but had circumstances meant it had to go for longer, people might have become accustomed to it. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8544412)
Smartass:p. While Leeds may not fill Elland Road I think you will find that they have managed to retain reasonable attendaces (20-30k) in the lower leagues, far in advance of what most teams in those leagues have to operate on.
Newcastle did the same. *After Manure, Arsenal and Man City. Ahead of Liverpool & Chelsea and the rest of the rabble. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8544443)
Or rather better. Average home crowd this year was 43,400 at St. James's, the fourth highest in the country.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8544450)
Because, apart from smoking tabs and drinking brown ale there's nought ought to do pet.
|
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8544449)
I don't believe Liverpool's problems this season are solely down to Benitez. Yes, he picked the teams, but he (hopefully picked those who did the best in training and those players did not do the business when it mattered. I'll admit I know very little about managing a football team, but I'd have lost patience with most of them long before now and would have fielded the reserve team for one match, just to show the regulars that they aren't beyond dropping. |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8544449)
I think he, like rafa, will wait a while and see what happens with the ownership. The difference is that the new ownership would clearly want him to be there this time next year. If you were the ownership would you sell him now, or wait till after the world cup when he may be worth even more (or perhaps less) depending on how things go... Would Gerrard leave after all the chelsea related soul searching? Or would they give him a push to free up some wages? Interesting summer ahead... |
Re: The Toon Army / EPL thread
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8544472)
I don't believe Liverpool's problems this season are solely down to Benitez. Yes, he picked the teams, but he (hopefully picked those who did the best in training and those players did not do the business when it mattered. I'll admit I know very little about managing a football team, but I'd have lost patience with most of them long before now and would have fielded the reserve team for one match, just to show the regulars that they aren't beyond dropping.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:42 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.