![]() |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 12740658)
It's hard to encourage people to vote on cold, emotionless facts, and when most of the popular media is on the opposition's side. Leave had an advantage of having had the near-constant drip-drip of anti-EU stories for at least 20 yrs, creating fear and division, and the EU referendum gave readers of those publications an outlet for their voices. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12740645)
True, that may be a difficult position to take, but the degree to which Brexit allows the UK to "take back conrtol" of immigration (and absolutely, the degree to which that is actually a desirable outcome) is certainly questionable. Much easier, though, to point out the fact that there were (indeed, until Brexit, there still are) already very many tools in the EU toolbox (such as requiring registration, requiring proof of gainful employment within a certain period, etc etc) for EU migrants that the UK chose not to implement. Those tools would have provided significantly greater control over immigration within the context of the EU.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12740651)
.
2. The UK's demand for cheap labour means that there will still be loads of impoverished immigrants, perhaps more Chinese and Indians, perhaps America's rejects, just from different countries. I don't think the average Britain particularly hates his or her house being burgled by Europeans, they just don't want their houses burgled, so it's out-of-the-frying-pan. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12740645)
True, that may be a difficult position to take, but the degree to which Brexit allows the UK to "take back conrtol" of immigration (and absolutely, the degree to which that is actually a desirable outcome) is certainly questionable. Much easier, though, to point out the fact that there were (indeed, until Brexit, there still are) already very many tools in the EU toolbox (such as requiring registration, requiring proof of gainful employment within a certain period, etc etc) for EU migrants that the UK chose not to implement. Those tools would have provided significantly greater control over immigration within the context of the EU.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12740651)
1. The UK could have restricted immigration from within the EU while staying in; there's no requirement that any EU citizen be allowed to live anywhere.
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12740651)
2. The UK's demand for cheap labour means that there will still be loads of impoverished immigrants, perhaps more Chinese and Indians, perhaps America's rejects, just from different countries. I don't think the average Britain particularly hates his or her house being burgled by Europeans, they just don't want their houses burgled, so it's out-of-the-frying-pan.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 12740658)
It's hard to encourage people to vote on cold, emotionless facts, and when most of the popular media is on the opposition's side. Leave had an advantage of having had the near-constant drip-drip of anti-EU stories for at least 20 yrs, creating fear and division, and the EU referendum gave readers of those publications an outlet for their voices.
Yes, Remain could have done better. Any suggestions on what they could/should have done? |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12740670)
I had left almost a decade before the vote so I don't know what arguments, for or against, were put forward but, if the electorate were not persuaded on the arguments, or couldn't be bothered to vote, history shows what can happen.
Cummings is clearly driving Johnson to appeal to the emotive not the cerebral, I can promise you that my Facebook feed is testament to the success of that strategy. But hopefully in the final event, cerebral will win over emotion. What fascinating times we live in. And all the while utterly ignoring the very real climate catastrophe that awaits our grandchildren. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12740633)
Well....I think if the EU had remained as it was initially intended....a simple trading block/agreement between member countries,
From the Schumann Declaration, 1950 - this proposal will lead to the realization of the first concrete foundation of a European federation indispensable to the preservation of peace. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12740668)
True, but Polish plumbers cannot come to Canada and undercut the local workforce as they can throughout the EU. That is not an issue if you want to have your plumbing done cheaply, but is if you are a plumber that loses your livelihood, or has your income reduced, as a result.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12740676)
Because expensive plumbing is the mark of a civilised society right? I had an English plumber come by last month, you have no need to worry about his paycheck !
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12740674)
One needn't consider the electorate as a whole.... the informed on either side will vote according to their considered opinions. It's only the uninformed that you need to win over... to put it crudely, Sun readers, Mail readers, Mirror readers. And emotion trumps over fact with that lot.
Cummings is clearly driving Johnson to appeal to the emotive not the cerebral, I can promise you that my Facebook feed is testament to the success of that strategy. But hopefully in the final event, cerebral will win over emotion. What fascinating times we live in. And all the while utterly ignoring the very real climate catastrophe that awaits our grandchildren. I would have voted to remain, but I wouldn't attempt to argue that those that disagreed with me were uninformed. They simply have different priorities. None of which are any less valid than mine. Many of my relatives live in Cornwall. Post 1992, they had nothing good to say about the EU. Many of my other relatives live in Ireland and, for them, the EU is a wonderful thing. Each equally valid and to dismiss one over the other simply because of how their lives, or yours, is affected is, sorry, bullshit. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12740684)
Polish plumbers cannot legally undercut British plumbers, unless British customers are happy to break the law. And if an electorate is willing to break the law so readily, we may as well all move to Italy.
I appreciate that an employer may not be able to pay their employers differently based upon nationality but, whether the employer gets the work in the first place is simple economics, is it not? |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12740686)
Oh, I see. The argument that those that don't agree with you are "uninformed."
I would have voted to remain, but I wouldn't attempt to argue that those that disagreed with me were uninformed. They simply have different priorities. None of which are any less valid than mine. Many of my relatives live in Cornwall. Post 1992, they had nothing good to say about the EU. Many of my other relatives live in Ireland and, for them, the EU is a wonderful thing. Each equally valid and to dismiss one over the other simply because of how their lives, or yours, is affected is, sorry, bullshit. I'm not saying they were stupid or racist, but - uninformed as to what Brexit entails - absolutely yes. Then and now. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12740670)
I had left almost a decade before the vote so I don't know what arguments, for or against, were put forward but, if the electorate were not persuaded on the arguments, or couldn't be bothered to vote, history shows what can happen.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12740694)
Of course they were uninformed. Even today, 3 and a half years later, they're still uninformed. Why did the government have to be legally forced to reveal certain documents like Operation Yellowhammer?
I'm not saying they were stupid or racist, but - uninformed as to what Brexit entails - absolutely yes. Then and now. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:10 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.