![]() |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12888530)
Someone out here is making masks with Newfie messages on them:
https://www.varagesale.com/regina-sk...-message-masks |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12888367)
Yeah, pretty much this - but Printer is still denying that masks are helpful, while simultaneously pointing out that places where masks are required are not apparently the source of hotspots.
I'm curious, how much evidence he needs to accept that masks are helpful, because at the moment he has stated that places without a mask mandate are generating hotspots, and places with a mask mandate are not generating hotspots. So at the moment all the empirical evidence, that he himself has cited, points to masks being an effective way to limit the spread of the virus. What more does he need? :confused: The trouble is with all the mixed messages we have been receiving in BC. When the top BC Health official say things like this, it's not really helping promote a 'wear a mask' culture is it. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...8909ce5bcb.jpg |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12888775)
I'm on your side regarding masks, I really am.
The trouble is with all the mixed messages we have been receiving in BC. When the top BC Health official say things like this, it's not really helping promote a 'wear a mask' culture is it. ..... All of the above have, at various times, stated that masks are (at least) unnecessary/unhelpful, or may actually be harmful. Thirty seconds reading behind the soundbite headline immediately explains why, with various reasons such as not wanting to divert scarce supplies away from health professionals, that touching or adjusting your mask might lead to contamination, that people wearing a mask might stop bothering to SD, etc. Basically governments are saying that people are too stupid to be trusted to wear and "manage" a mask, and it appears that they are right. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12888793)
I don't take my advice from the provincial government in BC, nor the state government in NC, the federal government in DC, or the British government, or the CDC (US) or WHO and I recommend you don't either.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12888809)
Too right. I get all my scientific data from Facebook :lol:
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12888793)
All of the above have, at various times, stated that masks are (at least) unnecessary/unhelpful, or may actually be harmful. Thirty seconds reading behind the soundbite headline immediately explains why, with various reasons such as not wanting to divert scarce supplies away from health professionals, that touching or adjusting your mask might lead to contamination, that people wearing a mask might stop bothering to SD, etc. Basically governments are saying that people are too stupid to be trusted to wear and "manage" a mask, and it appears that they are right.
It seems to me that by merely encouraging mask wearing but not requiring it, the resistance to it has been allowed to grow and that when it's inevitably made mandatory it's going to be a whole lot more difficult to enforce than had authorities made it mandatory at the earliest practical time. It might also have been useful to have established the wearing of masks and then follow up with wearing properly. |
Re: Masks
I do realise that those of us in more populated areas should wear masks 'properly', but I do think on the bigger picture issue if we just 'required' every Tom, Dick and Harriet to stick one on and just shut up and get on with it, it would be better. Get over yourself and put one on! Personal choices stop, when your choice can impinge on the life of my family and vice versa. At the present, certainly here, the the etiquette of the wearing can be learned...it's the few who won't listen who are the problem.
|
Re: Masks
In Japan they reduced the level of Covid 19 by .............. yes, wearing masks (and social distancing). Unlike the western cultures, they were perhaps more culturally inclined to wear them.. .. early mask wearing appears to have made a difference..... https://globalnews.ca/news/7075024/m...avirus-deaths/. and https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/06/w...rus-masks.html
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12888821)
At various times that etc has also included reducing the hand washing as well as not distancing. But there is already an acceptance (the latest study) that it's not necessarily the case. It was found that hand washing had not reduced.
It seems to me that by merely encouraging mask wearing but not requiring it, the resistance to it has been allowed to grow and that when it's inevitably made mandatory it's going to be a whole lot more difficult to enforce than had authorities made it mandatory at the earliest practical time. It might also have been useful to have established the wearing of masks and then follow up with wearing properly. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by MillieF
(Post 12888835)
I do realise that those of us in more populated areas should wear masks 'properly', but I do think on the bigger picture issue if we just 'required' every Tom, Dick and Harriet to stick one on and just shut up and get on with it, it would be better. Get over yourself and put one on! Personal choices stop, when your choice can impinge on the life of my family and vice versa. At the present, certainly here, the the etiquette of the wearing can be learned...it's the few who won't listen who are the problem.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by MillieF
(Post 12888835)
...it's the few who won't listen who are the problem.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12888480)
There seems to be a basic misunderstanding here.
Grocery stores remained open throughout, as you say, with no (known) spikes. Have you heard that there was thing called social distancing? There was something else too. Limits on numbers in the stores. Also aisles were made one way only. Stuff like that designed to keep people apart making transmission less likely. Have you perhaps considered that pubs, clubs and restaurants all have something in common? Namely the frequent or ongoing need to access one's mouth? Do you not think that makes transmission a bit more likely than the restrictions that are far more practical in grocery stores? Spain is currently considering further strict lockdowns and they put the blame of the recent spikes firmly on the young party crowd who get together at night and drink and party. Clearly masks have had no affect in this scenario because they have a very strict mask mandate. And to add last time i looked we still have social distancing, arrows and lines on floors and plexi screens and signs on doors stating maximum numbers allowed so nothing has changed in that respect. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 12888891)
Yes yes yes. So i ask again, what affect do masks have in places such as pubs, clubs, private functions and restaurants where we have seen the biggest spikes and where they are extremely unlikely to be required? ....
The question I think you're trying to ask is "Why do we allow places where wearing a mask is impractical, to remain open?" And that is, indeed, a damn good question! :frown: |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 12888891)
So i ask again, what affect do masks have in places such as pubs, clubs, private functions and restaurants where we have seen the biggest spikes and where they are extremely unlikely to be required? If the facts are that these places will always be considered worse for transmission then surely any mandate for masks in stores and public buildings will have very little effect on the numbers..
If they wear a mask and follow the other rules when doing so, then it's far less likely that they will infect other shoppers. That's a good thing isn't it? You may argue it won't change the numbers but it changes what the numbers would become if masks were not mandated in the grocery stores. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12888893)
Is this like a trick question or something? :confused: ...... The answer to the question as you wrote it is surely "if you're not wearing a mask it won't be effective." :unsure:
The question I think you're trying to ask is "Why do we allow places where wearing a mask is impractical, to remain open?" And that is, indeed, a damn good question! :frown: Clubs in UK are still closed as far as i know because of this very threat, however illegal street raves and the like are obviously harder to control. We just seem to see this current spate of people demanding masks be made mandatory in shops when shops don't appear to be the bigger issue. Naked dancing ladies however might be a problem and sadly i will admit i haven't frequented this one as yet. https://cfjctoday.com/2020/07/28/cov...na-strip-club/ |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12888901)
You appear to be saying that with bars and restaurants open and where mask wearing isn't practical that there's not much point in wearing masks in, say, grocery stores. Well what about those people that do get exposed to the virus in those places and may or may not develop the illness but may still be infectious and then want to go to the grocery store?
If they wear a mask and follow the other rules when doing so, then it's far less likely that they will infect other shoppers. That's a good thing isn't it? You may argue it won't change the numbers but it changes what the numbers would become if masks were not mandated in the grocery stores. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12888845)
I was in a local pharmacy yesterday, and one of the pharmancy assistants - behind the pharmacy counter, handing over prescriptions, was wearing a mask that didn't cover her nose! :frown:
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 12888906)
No i'm simply saying grocery stores are not the problem. Young party crowds are the problem. We need to address the cause of the spikes to reduce the transmission and masking up in grocery stores whilst allowing a basic free for all in the pub, club, party scene is NOT addressing the problem its putting a band aid on a surgical wound
So, if you had a surgical wound, and a band aid, you wouldn't apply it because it's not a proper bandage? If you had a Hummer and needed dinner you wouldn't take it to the shops because it's not a proper truck? That's called making perfect the enemy of good. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by abner
(Post 12888987)
Was she wearing glasses? ...
I wear glasses, and don't have the fogging problem, but I wear a tight-fitting mask, where the air I breath goes through the filter, not around the edges. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12889069)
No she wasn't.
I wear glasses, and don't have the fogging problem, but I wear a tight-fitting mask, where the air I breath goes through the filter, not around the edges. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12889154)
i wear glasses and mostly don't have the fogging problem. Sometimes when I start wearing it but then it goes away. I put the top of the mask under my specs.
They fog up the minute I get into a taxi or when in small rooms but not big shops. I've decided I can just remove my glasses in the taxi. It's not me driving and I know where I'm going. ;) |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12889211)
Me too. Makes no difference though. My glasses fog up outside if I look down while breathing. Don't look down. ....
They fog up the minute I get into a taxi or when in small rooms but not big shops. .... |
Re: Masks
I wonder if those who choose to wear burqas are also wearing a mask??????
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12889218)
Are your lenses glass or plastic? :unsure:
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12889242)
I haven't a clue.
A plastic lens is not cold to the touch, lighter in weight, and is used for premium insurance or for an upcharge. It used to be that NHS lens were glass, and plastic lens were an extra, and not insignificant, cost. I haven't had an NHS prescrition for many years, so I don't know what the current situation is. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 12888369)
You can wear masks everywhere if you like but will it stop the spikes we are seeing? Not unless you wear one in the places i listed. So how do you suggest that these spikes that have been troubling us are managed? Remember we weren't wearing them last month in stores, nothing much has changed, in fact grocery stores have been open this entire pandemic with few wearing masks and i don't remember any stats that show we had spikes in any grocery stores to be concerned about. To put it another way how do you get masks to be worn where there is obviously a risk, as in a pub for example?
We have a population of 63,343 with a COVID count of 911 and a death count of 9. Tell me that wearing a mask hasn't worked. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12889211)
Me too. Makes no difference though. My glasses fog up outside if I look down while breathing. Don't look down. :lol:
They fog up the minute I get into a taxi or when in small rooms but not big shops. I've decided I can just remove my glasses in the taxi. It's not me driving and I know where I'm going. ;) |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12889245)
A glass lens feels cold to the touch (like a drinking glass), is relatively heavy, and is cheaper - so is typically used for a "free"/ low cost prescriptions.
A plastic lens is not cold to the touch, lighter in weight, and is used for premium insurance or for an upcharge. It used to be that NHS lens were glass, and plastic lens were an extra, and not insignificant, cost. I haven't had an NHS prescrition for many years, so I don't know what the current situation is. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12889211)
Me too. Makes no difference though. My glasses fog up outside if I look down while breathing. Don't look down. :lol:
They fog up the minute I get into a taxi or when in small rooms but not big shops. I've decided I can just remove my glasses in the taxi. It's not me driving and I know where I'm going. ;) |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
(Post 12889232)
I wonder if those who choose to wear burqas are also wearing a mask??????
There would be no need. If you choose to wear a burqa instead of another form of mask, good luck to you. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Rete
(Post 12889260)
I am fully aware that you are talking about Canada, however, here in my county in southern Mississippi US we have had a mandate from mid-April that everyone needs to wear a mask in a store or public area. All venues serving food and drink and venues of public entertainment, i.e. concerts, plays, movies, etc. were closed. Some restaurants are slowly opening at 50% of capacity as are bars. Still no movies, concerts, plays, etc.
We have a population of 63,343 with a COVID count of 911 and a death count of 9. Tell me that wearing a mask hasn't worked. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 12889436)
We have a population in Kelowna twice that and up until recently had nothing. Of course there may well have been infections and there were the usual rumours that a friend said a friend had COVID. I believe there was one case in hospital a while back and a handful of cases originating from workers associated with a local garden centre. There have also been the odd case where a worker tested positive and is isolating but no further spread to note. No local deaths at all. All of this was achieved WITHOUT wearing masks and pretty much stayed that way until the recent spike in cases due to out of town party people who went to private gatherings, and then spread it around a few pubs. There were at last count up to 90 people infected due to that group and allegedly up to 1000 isolating, however today we had zero cases reported in the Interior Health region which we are part of. There are around 750,000 in the interior and total cases to date 356. We still haven't mandated masks and i would be more concerned from your numbers since you have mandated them.
|
Re: Masks
I see we are supposed to wear googles as well, is anybody on here doing that?
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12889451)
I see we are supposed to wear googles as well, is anybody on here doing that?
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12889451)
I see we are supposed to wear googles as well, is anybody on here doing that?
That said, I am still doing little other than go for groceries once a week and to Lowe's once a month, and am mostly aiming for "extreme SD" ...... shopping at a time when the shops are very quiet (groceries early, and Lowe's, late) and not willingly getting closer than 15-20ft if I can avoid it.
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12889685)
When operating a chain saw, yes.
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12889697)
I wear glasses, which I assume gives me some protection. :unsure:
That said, I am still doing little other than go for groceries once a week and to Lowe's once a month, and am mostly aiming for "extreme SD" ...... shopping at a time when the shops are very quiet (groceries early, and Lowe's, late) and not willingly getting closer than 15-20ft if I can avoid it. There's an idea - carrying one, engine running, might help with social distancing! :lol: |
Re: Masks
https://www.chainsawsdirect.com/prod...6655_1000.jpeg
Mine, except needs a good clean and a service. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12889723)
https://www.chainsawsdirect.com/prod...6655_1000.jpeg
Mine, except needs a good clean and a service. |
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12889728)
Mine's orange too. And I have a matching weed whacker!
|
Re: Masks
Originally Posted by printer
(Post 12889436)
today we had zero cases reported in the Interior Health region which we are part of. There are around 750,000 in the interior and total cases to date 356. We still haven't mandated masks.
State of emergency was declared here on March 19th, closing almost everything except grocery stores, pharmacies and other food places. Restaurants limited to take-out and delivery. No schools, no sports no leisure clubs, no barbers, nothing. Borders to neighbouring provinces "closed" soon after. Those measures led to a total number of cases of only 170, recoveries 166, 2 died and 2 current. At least 30 cases and the 2 deaths were linked to a sole traveller who broke the rules, didn't self isolate and went off to work. 99% of cases have been travel related so while it's almost non existent here, we've had numerous periods of a week or more without cases and then we get one or two - travel related again. You never know if you're with someone who travelled or a close contact of such a person. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:31 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.