Wikiposts

HOCKEY 2012

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 16th 2012 | 10:59 pm
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,342
From: Durham Region Extension
ultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
Not at the moment, although the UEFA HQ was in Paris until 1996. It's now in Switzerland.
Again.....am talking English League specifically, not a competition that includes winners from various leagues. See the difference there?
 
Old Sep 16th 2012 | 11:40 pm
  #17  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,511
From: Paradise NL
nldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond reputenldfc has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by haggis88
amateur ICE hockey is better anyway
??

Thats like saying Sunday league football is better than EPL / SPL
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 12:43 am
  #18  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,578
From: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by nldfc
??

Thats like saying Sunday league football is better than EPL / SPL
But Sunday league is better than the SPL
Well at least I wont be clearing them coming into Canada this season if it remains locked out.
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 12:51 am
  #19  
Every day's a school day
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,667
From: Was Calgary back in Edmonton again !!
cheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond reputecheeky_monkey has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by nldfc
??

Thats like saying Sunday league football is better than EPL / SPL
For punch ups, leg breaking tackles and half time oranges it is.
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 1:53 am
  #20  
Piff Poff's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 10,630
From: Red Deer, Alberta
Piff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond reputePiff Poff has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by JonboyE
The players are refusing to accept the percentage of revenue the league is offering. The HNL says to the players that they have the option to accept what the NHL is offering or nothing. It they do not accept then the NHL will shut down the league indefinitely. It is the whole league – not just the Canadian teams.
Once again thank you, at least I will understand a little about what my customers will yabba on about in the coming weeks
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 2:07 am
  #21  
iaink's Avatar
Moderαtor Emeritus
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,771
From: Upstate South Carolina
iaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Not that I really care, but my limited understanding is that last time around the players and owners agreed that they were a partnership of sorts, each mutually reliant on the other. They agreed that the salary cap would by x% of revenue. Since then hockey has done OK and the revenue has gone up. The owners now want to reduce that percentage.

There is more money for salaries, but a lower percentage of the revenue.

As others point out, its greed on both sides, and its the little guys, concession holders, sports bar owners etc etc that are going to be the real losers.
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 5:10 am
  #22  
Binned by Muderators
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC
JonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by Piff Poff
Once again thank you, at least I will understand a little about what my customers will yabba on about in the coming weeks
To make the conversations more meaningful, it goes beyond the issue of just wages.

Hockey is a regional sport in North America. The region is the habitable part of Canada and the northern part of the USA. The original six teams in the league were Montreal, Toronto, Boston, New York, Detroit and Chicago. All places where it gets cold in winter.

Back at the end of the 20th Century the NHL decided to try and make hockey a North America wide sport and we ended up with teams in such places as Arizona, Tennessee and Florida. These are places with no tradition of playing hockey and they have struggled to fill their stadiums and to survive financially.

The NHL faces two choices:
1) Allow the loss making teams to move to more traditional hockey markets as the Winnipeg Jets moved from Atlanta last year.
2) Reduce the payroll to such an extent that the southern teams with half full stadiums can still make a profit.

Whether or not the NHL is a truly national league in the USA is the real issue rather than just greedy billionaires arguing with greedy millionaires.
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 10:02 am
  #23  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by ultrarunner
Again.....am talking English League specifically, not a competition that includes winners from various leagues. See the difference there?
No. You suggested that the Canadian iced hockey teams are governed from abroad. In fact they have individually the same voting power in NHL decisions as US based franchises. Canada did not join a foreign league to use your own phrase.

UK football (and all other leagues in other European countries) are subject to EUFA and FIFA rules. Both based abroad. Unless you're Swiss.
 
Old Sep 17th 2012 | 12:28 pm
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,342
From: Durham Region Extension
ultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by nldfc
??

Thats like saying Sunday league football is better than EPL / SPL
But it flippin is....ever played at the Hackney Mashes?

better than the SPL for sure
 
Old Sep 19th 2012 | 1:49 pm
  #25  
London Mike's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,244
From: Toronto, ON
London Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond reputeLondon Mike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by magnumpi
There is none


End of thread




(Maybe the Leafs best season yet then)
Bettman's a cock and a crook and the players' union is totally right to take action here. It's irrelevant how much the players earn, the proposed collective bargaining agreement is grossly one-sided. This is all relative. If your employer turned to you tomorrow and said they were going to take a collective bigger share of your earnings for the next few years, and you had a union that represented you, you can bet that you'd be on strike too.
 
Old Sep 19th 2012 | 2:56 pm
  #26  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,578
From: Somewhere between Vancouver & St Johns
Former Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond reputeFormer Lancastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by London Mike
Bettman's a cock and a crook and the players' union is totally right to take action here. It's irrelevant how much the players earn, the proposed collective bargaining agreement is grossly one-sided. This is all relative. If your employer turned to you tomorrow and said they were going to take a collective bigger share of your earnings for the next few years, and you had a union that represented you, you can bet that you'd be on strike too.
The Canadian Govt are also doing it with their workers except they are not taking any profits from the workers they are just saying we are going to do this and you can tell your union that we wont bargain in good faith and if you threaten to strike you will be legislated back to work.
Oh and BTW here are 19000 plus layoff notices to your workers however no member of Parliament will be receiving one and we are not sure how to deal with MPs pensions you know the ones where they contribute one dollar and the taxpayers put in 24 dollars to it and they can retire on full pension after 6years service at the age of 55.
Do I feel sorry for the NHL players or owners do I ****.
 
Old Sep 20th 2012 | 12:35 am
  #27  
Slob
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,345
From: Ottineau
Souvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond reputeSouvy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by ultrarunner
Sounds like a self-inflict pain to me. Why on earth would you go and do that anyway? The only people I feel for at the workers at the concessions, Zamboni workers, and other minimum wage paid backroom staff, the rest can sod off
Quite a few of them are indeed sodding off. They are going to play for teams in Europe. Spezza is the latest. He's going to Switzerland. Others seem to be heading to (or back to) Russia.
 
Old Sep 20th 2012 | 2:41 am
  #28  
Hawk13's Avatar
Up Your Kilt
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,621
From: 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Mockingbird Heights
Hawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
Canadian iced hockey teams.
Just curious but you do realize it's ice hockey, right? are you trying to make some kind of point? if not, you just look stupid kinda like someone having a conversation with Brits over football and continually calling it soccer.

On the subject, at least junior hockey will thrive and it's a better game to watch anyway.
 
Old Sep 20th 2012 | 2:47 am
  #29  
Hawk13's Avatar
Up Your Kilt
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,621
From: 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Mockingbird Heights
Hawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond reputeHawk13 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by London Mike
Bettman's a cock and a crook
+1 never did like Bettman, he just looks and sounds like a weasel and I would never trust anything he says.

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
Do I feel sorry for the NHL players or owners do I ****.
+1 the rich complaining about the rich. Does anyone care? I don't.
 
Old Sep 20th 2012 | 2:52 am
  #30  
dbd33's Avatar
Assimilated Pauper
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 40,070
From: Ontario
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: HOCKEY 2012

Originally Posted by Hawk13
Just curious but you do realize it's ice hockey, right? are you trying to make some kind of point? if not, you just look stupid kinda like someone having a conversation with Brits over football and continually calling it soccer.

On the subject, at least junior hockey will thrive and it's a better game to watch anyway.
Iced hockey as in iced coffee, curious Canadiana.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.