![]() |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11143109)
It is not only the religious that are anti-gay, some are are simply uncomfortable with the concept.
Whether one thinks religion is all hocus pocus one must recognize that religion can be a powerful force. Not just some aspects of Christianity but other major religions have tended, at best, to frown upon homosexuality or to accept or tolerate it grudgingly. This is not particularly wise since homosexuality is, and has been, an essential component of humanity. Whether it is 5 or 10 percent homosexual any intelligent person would accept it is a fact of life. It has been so throughout history and won't change any time soon So as far I am concerned it boils down to how one balances an individual's disdain for the homosexual with the rights of that homosexual. Both groups have perfectly valid viewpoints and rights whether one agrees with one side or the other. I do not see it as a being clear cut. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11143559)
true
Whether one thinks religion is all hocus pocus one must recognize that religion can be a powerful force. Not just some aspects of Christianity but other major religions have tended, at best, to frown upon homosexuality or to accept or tolerate it grudgingly. This is not particularly wise since homosexuality is and has been an essential component of humanity. Whether it is 5 or 10 percent homosexual any intelligent person would accept it is a fact of life. It has been so throughout history and won't change any time soon so as far I am concerned it boils down to how one balances an individual's disdain for homosexuals with the right of the homosexual. Both groups have perfectly valid viewpoints and rights whether one agrees with one side or the other. I do not see it as a being clear cut. |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11143564)
Most people don't really care about it; those showing disdain are usually the raging closet queens.
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11143559)
true
Whether one thinks religion is all hocus pocus one must recognize that religion can be a powerful force. Not just some aspects of Christianity but other major religions have tended, at best, to frown upon homosexuality or to accept or tolerate it grudgingly. This is not particularly wise since homosexuality is, and has been, an essential component of humanity. Whether it is 5 or 10 percent homosexual any intelligent person would accept it is a fact of life. It has been so throughout history and won't change any time soon So as far I am concerned it boils down to how one balances an individual's disdain for the homosexual with the rights of that homosexual. Both groups have perfectly valid viewpoints and rights whether one agrees with one side or the other. I do not see it as a being clear cut. You pretty much state the argument above. Adherence to a particular religious viewpoint is a choice that people make. In almost all cases, sexual preference is a biological imperative. In nobody's world is it acceptable that the rights of an individual to express a biological fact should be overridden by the rights of an individual to express a choice. It is not OK, ever, anywhere, for an observer of a religion to refuse to do business with somebody because they are gay, or black, or female, or ginger, or left-handed.... all these characteristics are biologically determined, as opposed to the philosophical determination of a religion. It so happens that the cases you persist in highlighting - and if not defending, then at least fudging - are mostly about "Christian" conservatives. (As an aside, most of them do not have a Christian thought in their heads if they think that their behaviour is appropriate to the religious beliefs they lay claim to.) But it could equally apply to the subjugation of women by some Islamic sects, the intolerance of homosexuality by some Hindus (e.g. the BJP's stance on the anti-gay law in India in the run-up to national elections there), and the many other instances of religiously-justified intolerance around the world. Which provokes a thought... Much criticism over the years has been levelled at the Anglican church. But right now I think the diminishing flock of Anglicans can look on at some of the corruption and intolerance demonstrated by both Catholic and Baptist communions and realise that woolly-headed compromises and flabby theology have resulted in a rather delicate middle course being steered over the last couple of decades :) |
Re: gays not welcomed
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-26320102
this is quite an education for those who have just heard of arizona the map is quite startling |
Re: gays not welcomed
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-26320102
food for thought and it sure puts matters in perspective |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 11145606)
Here we go again, Mike. You're either more bigoted than you are prepared to acknowledge, or not a very good troll. It's perfectly clear-cut, and Arizona is wholly wrong.
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11145762)
maybe you should wake up to the fact there are two sides to the story instead of burying your head in the sand
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11145767)
Mike, if the Arizona bill were say aimed at 'blacks' would that make sense to you? If one religion were, for their own reasons, uncomfortable with dealing with people of colour, should they be allowed under the law to discriminate?
same applies to homosexuals all i want to point out is that there are two sides to the story it is up to the state and courts to rule on this but people will still have their opinions, good, bad or indifferent on this thread I have been playing devil's advocate and i hope this will be clear to all readers including oakvillian |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11145798)
of course not
same applies to homosexuals all i want to point out is that there are two sides to the story it is up to the state and courts to rule on this but people will still have their opinions, good, bad or indifferent on this thread I have been playing devil's advocate and i hope this will be clear to all readers including oakvillian |
Re: gays not welcomed
I personally am glad religious people are pushing for all these anti-gay laws, it just underscores how religion = bigotry. keep going, religious nuts!
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11145823)
I think the point being made that the era of state and courts accommodating discriminatory views is now over. If the people have those bad opinions, then they will have to change them. Simple as that. That's why AZ is making a mistake.
that is human nature it boils down to the rights of the collectivity over-riding individual rights, the true hallmark of a democracy |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11145870)
it will probably end up in the supreme court which will ban discrimination but people will not willingly change their opinions
that is human nature it boils down to the rights of the collectivity over-riding individual rights, the true hallmark of a democracy |
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11145946)
Yes. Also the true hallmark of autocracy!
|
Re: gays not welcomed
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11145974)
I tried some sarcasm but forgot it does not work at this site:)
You do confuse us Mike with all your devils advocacy and perceived sarcasm. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:42 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.