Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 11527515)

So you wish to reverse the burden of proof. How does one prove a trip to a location was for non terrorist purposes? Mr. PI, how could you justify hanging around locations with recording equipment is for non terrorist reasons?

Saying you are a PI does not cut it, the same excuse could be used by muslims too.

What crimes have those that are "having an eye kept on them", committed? If they have committed a crime, why have they not been arrested and prosecuted for it already?

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527520)

Wow you really don't get this do u? This is a war on the west, except you of course no reason for u to be bothered by it

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527520)

I was thinking of sending all the bad ones to the Falkland Islands until proven inicent.

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527520)

The two brothers in France busy shooting evyone in their way we're known to have trained with terrorists, WTF were they able to walk free on their return I ask !!

Originally Posted by Tirytory (Post 11527535)

Oh why let a little thing like the law stop you? Or individual rights to freedom. We could start applying it to other parts of human behaviour we don't like either, and really who needs to decide anyway... The unthinking masses seem good enough apparently..until of course it starts to have an impact on the way they live their life which is the inevitable conclusion.

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527552)

Now don't be silly TT, if the police have 90+ possible terror suspects in Canada under a "carefull watch" which they have, then why not ? If this saves life's is it not worth a try?

Or do moral rights of terrorists come first. Before the life's of their next victims. They may have killed people, but they were just showing their fredom and right to do so Yeh?

Originally Posted by Tirytory (Post 11527561)

I'm not being silly- you're the one proposing actions which affects everyone's civil liberties in the end.

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527552)

Now don't be silly TT, if the police have 90+ possible terror suspects in Canada under a "carefull watch" which they have, then why not ? If this saves life's is it not worth a try?

Or do moral rights of terrorists come first. Before the life's of their next victims. They may have killed people, but they were just showing their fredom and right to do so Yeh?

Originally Posted by Alan2005 (Post 11527565)

You do know how democracy works right? If you don't like it, why not move to Russia?

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527567)

you have your "let the terror people keep killing in the name of fredom" views and I have my don't close the door "after" the horse has gone views. Ok

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527589)

The tone of other posters indicate this

Like you all think I want to lock every one up and crate Russianada, I dont, where have I said that every one should be locked up? Same shit pal !!

Originally Posted by caretaker (Post 11527417)

The Muslim officer killed was the one shot in the head while he lay wounded on the sidewalk at Charlie Hebdo.

Originally Posted by Alan2005 (Post 11527573)

...you keep inventing points of view to argue with.

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 11527589)

...you all think I want to lock every one up