![]() |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11529948)
I don't really understand why people should have to apologize for things they didn't do. Both sides try to make people feel this way: from your tumblrina sjw to your fox news pundit. I must admit that I'm supprised to see shard doing it here.
|
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 11530041)
I missed that one, I may have condemned the rape but as I said I missed it so can't comment.
I did add that we should make it difficult to obtain guns when the last US shooting took place. But that won't happen. If you take time to read the name of THIS thread, you will notice it's a hint as to what it's about, it is a thread on what to do about "Islamic" fundamentalists. Hence why some have mentioned that scenario more than the Christians or rapes or world wars or pollution in China. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11530027)
Eh? Everyone can see what is happening, does it really matter how they characterize it?
I dislike religion as much as the next atheist, but it seems to me that you are letting rhetoric cloud your judgement a little. As Novo says you appear to be holding this ideology to a different standard to others. Did you demand any kind of demonstrations (let alone "million man" ones) when the Catholics were busy diddling kids? One of the problems with Islam, especially radical Islam, is that it actively seeks to convert people. And in the radical faction, once it does, it's not an easy exit. Of course Christianity does this too, but it is so benign in comparison. Though not during the Spanish inquisition, which so many apologists gleefully point out, while neglecting to notice the number of centuries progress in between. So it's not rhetoric which makes me differentiate between religions, it's an understanding of some of the differences. Catholic diddling. There is no need to demand demonstrations as the Catholic hierarchy (arguably an extremist element) was aware of the crimes and sought to resolve them. If the Vatican was recruiting young people to become an army of pedophiles and randomly making attacks, and capturing schoolchildren or villagers and killing or raping them, I would be inclined to call for a demonstration by moderate Catholics. Presumably you and others on here wouldn't? Anyway, I'll toss this into the irrelevant example bin along with Novo's one. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11530043)
Doesn't this ideology (the extreme part) hold itself to a different standard?
Their actions - 10 year old suicide bombers, gun attacks on offices and supermarkets, hacking people to death, beheading, flying jets into skyscrapers etc - are somewhat more extreme than what we see from the lunatic christian right I reckon. I, personally, do not. Abdul down the street is no more compelled to do anything that I am. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11530040)
Why must they? Why must people who have done nothing wrong do anything?
|
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11530057)
To prevent or lessen the chance of wrong being done. When there is a threat, everyone must play a part, and those most capable, must play the biggest part. Is that crazy?
|
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11530057)
To prevent or lessen the chance of wrong being done. When there is a threat, everyone must play a part, and those most capable, must play the biggest part. Is that crazy?
|
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11530015)
What is a jihad denier?
Edit: lesson to self: bats is always quicker than you. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11530040)
Why must they? Why must people who have done nothing wrong do anything?
|
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11530053)
...do you hold people accountable for the actions of others or not. By demanding that people act you are saying that you do..
If you become aware that your next door neighbour has some mates around and you see them tooled up planning some kind of heist, aren't you supposed to report it? If you don't and a bunch of people get killed while they carry out the crime, you are not accountable but do you share some responsibility for it? For some years now it's been reported that a lot of rabble rousing/recruitment has been taking place in mosques. It's probably true since I recall reading that many arrests and successful convictions have taken place because Imams and others using mosques have reported such things. It's not unreasonable to think that in other mosques some have been turning a blind eye when, perhaps, it might have been nipped in the bud. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11530084)
I think it's a nylon stocking worn under the whats-its-name.
Edit: lesson to self: bats is always quicker than you. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11530110)
I'm not sure that's quite the right way to describe it.
If you become aware that your next door neighbour has some mates around and you see them tooled up planning some kind of heist, aren't you supposed to report it? If you don't and a bunch of people get killed while they carry out the crime, you are not accountable but do you share some responsibility for it? . |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11530141)
It is not quite the same. I haven't seen anyone saying that muslims who know about specific terrorist plots should report them. I only see demands that Muslims in general must do something.
|
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
The only progress that Islam has made as a religion is the use of bomb vests,and firearms,otherwise it is a religion which has not adapted to the times.
Yes other religions have had violent bloody pasts,the keyword being 'past',Islam needs to change in order to fit into a modern world,sadly the people who follow Islam seem unwilling to bring their backward religion into modern times,instead wishing to live in the past,which is where the problems are seeded. I agree that if Muslims come to western countries that they should abide by western laws,not backward medieval religious views and followings that so obviously separate them from the rest of the modern world. I noticed some people saying that Muslims should be allowed halal meat in the western countries,yet I have noticed some of those people bitch about people who hunt,why is that? A hunter tries his/her best to dispatch an animal quickly and humanely,halal prepared meat is the opposite,a Muslim has no idea if their meat has been slowly bled to death or instantly ended,yet they demand their food to suffer. Not all Muslims are bad people,but the majority of them feel that Shariah law supersedes the laws of any other,again this is a major problem and until Islamic attitudes change we are going to continue to have problems. Other than Muslims bringing their religion into the 21st century willingly,and adapting to the countries in which they choose to live I don't really see anything changing in their attitudes. Western governments have been too fast to bend to Islamic demands which in turn has caused more problems as well. |
Re: Fundamentalism - What to do about Islamic....
^ Dear me. Another fundamentalist whacko.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:59 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.