The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
#151
Not from my point of view. 
Perhaps for the benefit of How long, I should be clearer. He is on my ignore list, this means I can't read his posts (unless someone quotes him).
BTW, I've no idea why he appears to be angry with me. I honestly can't remember ever even reading one of his posts before. Of course I can't swear to that, but I'm too uninterested to check.
There's probably a doctor in Keswick if it's just that he's low on his meds.

Perhaps for the benefit of How long, I should be clearer. He is on my ignore list, this means I can't read his posts (unless someone quotes him).
BTW, I've no idea why he appears to be angry with me. I honestly can't remember ever even reading one of his posts before. Of course I can't swear to that, but I'm too uninterested to check.
There's probably a doctor in Keswick if it's just that he's low on his meds.
#152
Banned



Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 237
From: Keswick, ON









[QUOTE=Novocastrian;9853086]Not from my point of view. 
Perhaps for the benefit of How long, I should be clearer. He is on my ignore list, this means I can't read his posts (unless someone quotes him).
A teacher with an open mind, thats the spirit.

Perhaps for the benefit of How long, I should be clearer. He is on my ignore list, this means I can't read his posts (unless someone quotes him).
A teacher with an open mind, thats the spirit.
#153










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











He did claim that nobody had upset him, but he's since clarified that he's actually upset and offended on the behalf of all the celebrities and is simply defending them. Understandable really; some people identify with celebrities like this even though they've only ever seen them on TV.
#155
He did claim that nobody had upset him, but he's since clarified that he's actually upset and offended on the behalf of all the celebrities and is simply defending them. Understandable really; some people identify with celebrities like this even though they've only ever seen them on TV.
At the last count we have roughly 30 bona fide entries in the game. But only one conscientious objector. For all I know there are many others, but they (if they exist) have simply decided not to contribute.
I hereby invite anyone who agrees with him that the thread is in unacceptably bad taste to say so. I however like bad taste when done tastefully.
#156
Not a good week for American musicians.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/jan/19/johnny-otis
How Long
- I take no pleasure in anyones death but suggest that if you find the thread in bad taste, you can choose not to read.
ah well, just noticed Novo's post & could have just +1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/jan/19/johnny-otis
How Long
- I take no pleasure in anyones death but suggest that if you find the thread in bad taste, you can choose not to read.
ah well, just noticed Novo's post & could have just +1
#157
#159
Yorkshire meets Vegas






Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,354
From: T. ON (so there!)











My List
Prince Phillip
Margaret Thatcher
Lindsay Lohan (joker)
Sinead O'Connor
Boy George
Prince Phillip
Margaret Thatcher
Lindsay Lohan (joker)
Sinead O'Connor
Boy George
#164
It might the anonymity of it but it seems that computer and communications technology has turned all of us into sick ****s. They say the 1970s was bad but the stuff that gets sent around these days is unbelievable. My nan sent me a picture of a donkey shagging a dwarf and she'd cc'd it to all the people in her address book.
#165
It might the anonymity of it but it seems that computer and communications technology has turned all of us into sick ****s. They say the 1970s was bad but the stuff that gets sent around these days is unbelievable. My nan sent me a picture of a donkey shagging a dwarf and she'd CC'd it to all the people in her address book. 




