Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver of Ineligibility Application
#5806
Forum Regular


Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 97

I contacted ARO, and they are referring me back to the embassy. However, the embassy stated that they don't have any updates or control over how long ARO takes to process requests. I even had a local congressman's office reach out to them, but they received the same response.
#5807
Forum Regular

Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 39

I’m hoping for some updates soon. The last executive order, "One Voice," signed on Feb 12, 2025 aimed to ensure strict adherence by officers and diplomats to the Trump Administration’s foreign policy vision. After taking office, Trump signed numerous executive orders, and this particular order sought to enforce compliance across the Department of State and other relevant agencies.
Additionally, the order called for revisions or a possible replacement of the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM), which governs all aspects of U.S. foreign affairs, including visa policies and ineligibility waivers. According to the FAM website, a revision was made on February 26, 2025, under 9 FAM 305.4, regarding waiver processing. The updated clause states that all waiver applications will now follow the same evaluation procedures, and prior approvals will not influence future waiver recommendations or decisions.
"9 FAM 305.4-3(D): Each recommendation for a waiver must be made anew and independently, after considering all of the facts. You should not give undue deference or rely solely on a previous officer's decision to request a waiver. All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Prior approval of a waiver does not guarantee that ARO will approve any subsequent waivers."
The summary of this revision explicitly mentions that the change aligns with executive orders issued by President Trump. This could imply two key changes:
Additionally, the order called for revisions or a possible replacement of the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM), which governs all aspects of U.S. foreign affairs, including visa policies and ineligibility waivers. According to the FAM website, a revision was made on February 26, 2025, under 9 FAM 305.4, regarding waiver processing. The updated clause states that all waiver applications will now follow the same evaluation procedures, and prior approvals will not influence future waiver recommendations or decisions.
"9 FAM 305.4-3(D): Each recommendation for a waiver must be made anew and independently, after considering all of the facts. You should not give undue deference or rely solely on a previous officer's decision to request a waiver. All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Prior approval of a waiver does not guarantee that ARO will approve any subsequent waivers."
The summary of this revision explicitly mentions that the change aligns with executive orders issued by President Trump. This could imply two key changes:
- Similar processing times for both first-time and repeat waiver applicants. All waiver cases will now be treated as entirely new applications.
- Potential delays. The last known waiver approval in the dataset was recorded on February 6, 2025. Given that the revision took effect on February 26, there is a possibility of a 2-3 week delay beyond the typical 280-300 day processing timeline as we have seen from the spreadsheet.
#5809
Forum Regular


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 81

9 FAM 305.4-3(D) (U) Prior Waivers and Weighing the Decision to Request a Waiver
(CT:VISA-2129; 02-26-2025)
(U) Each recommendation for a waiver must be made anew and independently, after considering all of the facts. You should not give undue deference or rely solely on a previous officer's decision to request a waiver. All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Prior approval of a waiver does not guarantee that ARO will approve any subsequent waivers.
This is for the officers at the embassy. So those who had their interview BEFORE Feb 26 and have already been approved for a waiver should not be affected. Those after, then yes I see a further delay. Am I reading this wrong?
(CT:VISA-2129; 02-26-2025)
(U) Each recommendation for a waiver must be made anew and independently, after considering all of the facts. You should not give undue deference or rely solely on a previous officer's decision to request a waiver. All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Prior approval of a waiver does not guarantee that ARO will approve any subsequent waivers.
This is for the officers at the embassy. So those who had their interview BEFORE Feb 26 and have already been approved for a waiver should not be affected. Those after, then yes I see a further delay. Am I reading this wrong?
#5810
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 427











9 FAM 305.4-3(D) (U) Prior Waivers and Weighing the Decision to Request a Waiver
(CT:VISA-2129; 02-26-2025)
(U) Each recommendation for a waiver must be made anew and independently, after considering all of the facts. You should not give undue deference or rely solely on a previous officer's decision to request a waiver. All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Prior approval of a waiver does not guarantee that ARO will approve any subsequent waivers.
This is for the officers at the embassy. So those who had their interview BEFORE Feb 26 and have already been approved for a waiver should not be affected. Those after, then yes I see a further delay. Am I reading this wrong?
(CT:VISA-2129; 02-26-2025)
(U) Each recommendation for a waiver must be made anew and independently, after considering all of the facts. You should not give undue deference or rely solely on a previous officer's decision to request a waiver. All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Prior approval of a waiver does not guarantee that ARO will approve any subsequent waivers.
This is for the officers at the embassy. So those who had their interview BEFORE Feb 26 and have already been approved for a waiver should not be affected. Those after, then yes I see a further delay. Am I reading this wrong?
9 FAM 305.4-3(D) (U) Consistency in Requesting a Waiver
(CT:VISA-1982; 05-06-2024)
(U) You should be consistent in waiver recommendations. If another consular officer requested a waiver for an applicant in the past, you should do so for future applications, unless there is new derogatory information, a material change in the purpose of their trip, or some other change in circumstances to be considered under INA 212(a). All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Consistency in recommendations does not guarantee that the ARO will approve subsequent waivers.
#5811
Forum Regular

Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 39

The change only impacts the consular official who decides whether or not to submit a waiver request on your behalf to the ARO, and it's really just a change in emphasis. It doesn't change what the ARO does, which is to treat every request as new. Here is the same section from the previous week:
9 FAM 305.4-3(D) (U) Consistency in Requesting a Waiver
(CT:VISA-1982; 05-06-2024)
(U) You should be consistent in waiver recommendations. If another consular officer requested a waiver for an applicant in the past, you should do so for future applications, unless there is new derogatory information, a material change in the purpose of their trip, or some other change in circumstances to be considered under INA 212(a). All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Consistency in recommendations does not guarantee that the ARO will approve subsequent waivers.
9 FAM 305.4-3(D) (U) Consistency in Requesting a Waiver
(CT:VISA-1982; 05-06-2024)
(U) You should be consistent in waiver recommendations. If another consular officer requested a waiver for an applicant in the past, you should do so for future applications, unless there is new derogatory information, a material change in the purpose of their trip, or some other change in circumstances to be considered under INA 212(a). All requests must be accompanied by a supporting justification from you as the requesting official. Consistency in recommendations does not guarantee that the ARO will approve subsequent waivers.
#5812
Forum Regular


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 81

Sorry, that is what I meant. I paid for the express courier service.
#5814
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 427











#5817
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 427











#5818
Forum Regular

Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 39

Congratulations! Seems like you received the email right on cue. Good thing is that we know the ARO is active. Bad thing is that my wait is heading towards unexplored territories…
#5819
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 1975
Posts: 0

#5820
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 427












Emails from [email protected]
The "follow up" and "additional documents" are basically the same message - please send your passport, following the instructions in the 3rd "courier-in instructions" email. It was not a request for any other documents other than the passport.
Last edited by joolsjools; Mar 5th 2025 at 3:58 am.



